1 / 22

Group 14

Murder most foul?. Group 14. Kwa Jie Hui Jerrick Lim Xu Run Huai Wang Zhi Jian. Section 1 – Solving the crime. Most difficult task. The questions sessions Many varied questions (useful, useless, sidetrack) Many people have different POVs Noisy, excited. Most easiest task.

dewei
Download Presentation

Group 14

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Murder most foul? Group 14 KwaJieHui Jerrick Lim Xu Run Huai Wang ZhiJian

  2. Section 1 – Solving the crime

  3. Most difficult task • The questions sessions • Many varied questions (useful, useless, sidetrack) • Many people have different POVs • Noisy, excited

  4. Most easiest task • Problem solving sessions • Fun though challenging • Look unsolvable but simple • Leisure

  5. What worked, what didn’t? • Worked: • Evidences done at the laboratory • Quite accurate • Rather a step-by-step session • Teachers to guide us • Learnt many forensic methods there

  6. What worked, what didn’t? • Didn’t worked: • Questions & Hypothesis • Asked the wrong questions • Misled by the suspects • Thought that only Jane Liu, Peter Hamilton and Robyn Jones were the only possible ones involved with the crime

  7. Media • Not helpful • May misled police and public • Cause confusion, panic • Article was made to seek attention and finish up the job • Facts were wrong and not supported

  8. Evidence

  9. Crime solving • Harder than it looks • Requires more than evidence • Things do not go as well as you think • Requires quick thinking(Think out of the box)

  10. Evidence • Locard’s principle • Might not be enough • Must be very careful • Slightest detail must be noticed • Does not equal to everything

  11. CSI • Different view. Why? • Knowledge of forensics from CSI • More than what is in a television series • What different view?

  12. Examples • Finalizing results • More than what actual crime scene investigators do

  13. Fingerprints • Fingerprints are unique, however….. • Results not correct • Many fingerprints at the crime scene

  14. Lip prints

  15. Section 3 – The verdict

  16. Peter Hamilton • Verdict : Imprisonment for life • Reasons : • Planned the whole murder • 1st degree murder • Drug Trafficking • Repeat offender

  17. Jack Smith • Verdict : Life imprisonment • Reasons : • Murder • Illegal possession and use of firearms

  18. Everyone at party • Knows about the drug dealings, but did not report to police about it • Use of drugs ( Jane Liu, Robyn Jones etc. )

  19. Section 4 - Reflections

  20. Group Reflection • Very beneficial • A new insight to forensic science • Teamwork • Learnt: • It is not easy to solve a crime • Think out of the box • Developed critical thinking skills • Learn to be focused • Vital questions are needed • The crime may not always seem as easy as it is • Forensic methods • Footprints • Fingerprints • Blood tests • Lip prints

More Related