1 / 10

Breakout session 1

Breakout session 1. The FAIR and DARE Experience a summary Cleo van Nispen tot Sevenaer Marlon Domingus. FAIR and DARE presentations of (local) IR implementations. Chair: Chris Awre [FAIR] Lilian van der Vaart [DARE] IR UVA - Renze Brandsma IR Wageningen - Peter van Boheemen

dex
Download Presentation

Breakout session 1

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Breakout session 1 The FAIR and DARE Experience a summary Cleo van Nispen tot Sevenaer Marlon Domingus

  2. FAIR and DARE presentations of (local) IR implementations Chair: Chris Awre [FAIR] Lilian van der Vaart [DARE] • IR UVA - Renze Brandsma • IR Wageningen - Peter van Boheemen • DAEDALUS project – Morag Mackie • SHERPA project- Bill Hubbard OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  3. Trends and issues • Amsterdam:Strategies to attract scientists to the IRby presenting value added services:• the ‘document of the day’• the Faculties’ publication lists• (soon:) set of full text publications of the top 100 scientists in Amsterdam (UVA)see: http://dare.uva.nl/en OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  4. Trends and issues • Wageningen:Technique for advanced searching: fingerprinting software by CollexisThe result is threefold: •found research groups •found researchers •found publications see: http://library.wur.nl/way/ OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  5. Trends and issues • Glasgow:•No single solution – a range of strategies necessary(short as well as long term) to attract scientists to contribute to an IR• Different IR systems used for different types of contentsee: http://agenda.cern.ch/askArchive.php?base=agenda&categ=a035925&id=a035925s19t4/transparencies OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  6. Trends and issues • Nottingham:• Rather different (quality) expectations of an IR depending on the given scientific field (for example: pre prints)• List of 5 recommendations for a full text article to be preserved (also: the right to not preserve) see: http://agenda.cern.ch/askArchive.php?base=agenda&categ=a035925&id=a035925s19t4/transparencies OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  7. Questions raised • How to persuade scientists that already contribute to Los Alamos to contribute to the local IR?Not?Harvest Los Alamos?[Renze Brandsma] OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  8. Questions raised • IR content: how to deal with data sets?How to deal with version control? • Preservation: who (decides who) is responsible for storage / long term preservation issues? • Metadata: who delivers ‘the’ metadata? OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  9. Questions raised • Future: publishers and libraries;two dogs fighting for the same bone?Possible scenario: the role of libraries may shift from archiving /preservation to publishing / education, where the published content complements the publisher’s content. OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

  10. Questions raised • What is needed for the IR to be used as a tool for research? Suggestion: to be more - rather than less - integrated into the core activities of a university: teaching, learning and researching. • Let’s list the different strategies to convince scientists to contribute to the local IRs so we can locally implement them. OAI3 - CERN, 2004-02-14

More Related