1 / 34

International Trade Theories Why do we need to trade? What is the logic / rationale for trading?

Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB. International Trade Theories Why do we need to trade? What is the logic / rationale for trading? How can we explain the phenomenon of international trade? Where is International Business?. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB.

dexter-bennett
Download Presentation

International Trade Theories Why do we need to trade? What is the logic / rationale for trading?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB International Trade Theories Why do we need to trade? What is the logic / rationale for trading? How can we explain the phenomenon of international trade? Where is International Business?

  2. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Any experiences / comments on international trade from any of you! International Trade the beginning of Multinational activity!!! Trade Flows among Triad Nations

  3. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Absolute Advantage Adam Smith Assuming that Labor is the only scare factor for production, countries can increase their well being by producing only those goods that they are able to produce at least cost.

  4. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Labor cost (Hours) of Production for one unit Mutton Beer A 20 40 B 40 20

  5. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Comparative Advantage David Ricardo Assumptions There are two countries A and B, both of which produce mutton and beer Returns to scale are constant

  6. Mutton Bear A 50 KG or 25 bottles B 60 KG or 150 bottles

  7. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Factors of production used in producing these two goods (say land) can be transformed without cost from producing mutton to producing beer and vice versa B has an absolute advantage in the production of both goods Specifically, if A used all its factors of production (say land),

  8. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB A could 50 kg or 25 bottles produce of mutton of bear Similarly, B 60 kg or 150 bottles could produce of muttonof bear For A, beer / mutton = 25 / 50 = 0.5 For B, beer / mutton = 150 / 60 = 2.5 Therefore, Mutton is more expensive in B than in A

  9. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Pre-trade production -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mutton (Kg) Beer (bottle) A 40 5 B 20 100 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 60 105 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 

  10. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Let, both countries agree to trade one bottle of beer per one kg of mutton and let country ‘A’ produce only mutton and both trade 10 kg of mutton and 10 bottles of beer

  11. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Post-trade Economy ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MuttonBeer Domestic Imports Domestic Imports- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- A 40 0 0 10 B 16 10 100 0 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Total 56 + 10 100 + 10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 66 110 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  12. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Intuitive understanding A person, good as a CEO and as a typist Where will he/ she invest time?

  13. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • Key Assumptions in • Ricardo’s Model • Production technologies – constant returns to scale • Perfectly Competitive market structure • No Technological Innovations and spillovers

  14. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • Hecksher–Ohlin Theory • Factor endowments and comparative advantage: • A country exports those goods that use intensively its relatively abundant factor of production.

  15. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • Assumptions • Different goods have different factors intensities. Textiles -> labor intensive, Semiconductors -> capital intensive • Countries differ with respect to their factor endowment. • India – natural resources(1900s) • Britain – capital and technology  • Markets are perfectly competitive and factors • are perfectly mobile • Decreasing return to scale (instead of constant return to scale)

  16. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Weaknesses of H-O Model Endowments are supposed to be given (but they can be created through innovation)  Endowments are static in nature.

  17. Leontief Paradox U.S. exports were less capital intensive than U.S. imports.

  18. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB GATT/WTO Promotes growth and enhances economic welfare by:

  19. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • Simulating more efficient utilization of factor endowments of different regions • Greater specialization of economy • Break domestic monopolies • Free & fair competition • Enable people to obtain goods from efficient sources of supply at cheaper prices • Making available more variety of goods and services

  20. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Wait a Minute In which global framework will all these work?

  21. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • Barriers to trade • ·Encourage local production • ·Protect local jobs • ·Protect infant industries • Encourage local and foreign direct investment • ·Reduce balance of payment problem • ·Promote export activity • ·Prevent dumping from other countries • ·Promote political objective

  22. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • Commonly used barriers • ·Price-based barriers (high tariffs) • ·Quantity limits (Examples – Steel? Textiles?) • ·International price fixing (OPEC – cartel) • Non-tariff barrier (Bureaucratic red tape, slow processing of import permits) • ·Financial limits (Exchange control on amount, limit on amount carried by travelers, Fixed rates of exchange, currency appreciation) • ·Foreign investment control ·

  23. Robust Theoretical Explanations Transaction Cost Theory Internalization Theory IPLC OLI Eclectic Paradigm Strategic Framework

  24. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Transaction Cost Theory Ronald Coase 1. The transaction costs of the market include the cost of discovering relevant prices and arranging contracts for each market transaction.

  25. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB 2.The existence of such costs means that whenever transactions can be organized and carried at a lower cost within the firm than through the market, they will be internalized and undertaken by the firm itself. 3.Firms will internalize transactions until the marginal cost of doing so exceeds the marginal revenue.

  26. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB 4.This theory originally focused on multi-plant domestic firm rather than the international operations of firms. 5.It suggests that the market is costly and inefficient for undertaking certain types of transactions.

  27. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB 6. It assumes that firms and markets represent alternate methods of organizing production. 7.Ignores the strategic aspect of in-house production of certain items even if the market can produce at lower cost.

  28. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Transaction Cost Theory Oliver Williamson (1975, 1981, 1985) Extended and refined this theory by relating transaction cost to three factors:

  29. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB Bounded rationality: refers to the impossibility of accessing to full information and the decisions are made at incomplete information Opportunism: It refers to the tendency of some people to cheat or misrepresent Asset specificity: It reflects the extent to which types of transaction, in order to be carried out, necessitate investment in material and intangible assets (such as knowledge)

  30. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • Internalization Theory • Internalization is concerned with imperfections in the intermediate product markets • 2.Market imperfections generate transaction costs for the firm • 3. By bringing interdependent activities under common ownership and control, a firm reduces the transaction costs in its business

  31. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB 4. It proposes that firms expand across borders because the transaction costs incurred in international intermediate product markets can be reduced by internalizing these markets within the firm 5.It can be used to explain the patterns of both vertical integration (Production, Marketing, R&D) and horizontal integration across borders

  32. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB When applied to International business Vertical Integration: Export, Overseas Production, Overseas Distribution Horizontal Integration: Selling through Exclusive and Non Exclusive Retail outlets

  33. Amar KJR Nayak/IB/XIMB • What’s Missing? • A theory of market failure rather than of firm success (Growth of Firm) • It is preoccupied with the cost of organizing transactions in the markets and it does not consider the organizing or the management costs incurred by firms (Demsetz 1988) • Collusion & Market Power – Asymmetry in entrepreneurship, capital, information, …

  34. Robust Theoretical Explanations Transaction Cost Theory Internalization Theory IPLC OLI Eclectic Paradigm Strategic Framework

More Related