1 / 21

NA4 Progress

NA4 Progress. PSC06 Istanbul, 7-8 December 2009. Cevat Sener Dept. of Computer Engineering METU, Ankara sener@ceng.metu.edu.tr. The SEE-GRID-SCI initiative is co-funded by the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures contract no. 211338. Activities.

dexter-neal
Download Presentation

NA4 Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NA4 Progress PSC06Istanbul, 7-8 December 2009 Cevat Sener Dept. of Computer Engineering METU, Ankara sener@ceng.metu.edu.tr The SEE-GRID-SCI initiative is co-funded by the European Commission under the FP7 Research Infrastructures contract no. 211338

  2. Activities • NA4.1 Study the Grid applications • NA4.2 Adapt Grid applications • NA4.3 Support the deployed applications • NA4.4 Assess applications Grid usage and take-up

  3. Deliverables • DNA4.1 Target applications analysis • DNA4.2 Application deployment and support • DNA4.3 Porting guidelines for target scientific fields • DNA4.4 User community engagement and applications assessment

  4. Gridification Status • Some more deployed in the last quarter – But not all! • Applications generally going well. • Some problems with CHERS • Its ASG team: Florin Pop and Emanouil Atanassov, in addition to Neki Frasheri • RO team is also ready for the support • Details shall be covered within the VO sessions.

  5. Web Pages / Wiki • All applications are supposed to have a web page or a wiki section with • Scientific model implemented • User documentation • Application Service usage – In case of a separate web page, there should be a link from the wiki • Many applications has improved their page/wiki section • However, some tend to postpone improving the content on the web till when their applications become fully-ready.

  6. Web Pages / Wiki • Especially, MCSAES, CHERS, MSACM, MSERRHSA, CCIAQ, WRF-ARW and MDSSP-WA should improve asap. – But, all need to check considering the given list on the previous slide • ROMS has a web page, but no link from its wiki section

  7. Application Dissemination • Submissions to UF by most of the applications – except MSERRHSA and ROMS ? • Contributions to the VO training sessions • Applications prefer not to submit to iSGTW before their applications are fully-developed. • List of scientific events & journals to be announced (kept updated) by the VO Leaders & Scientific Representatives • Only by Seismo VO, so far, at http://erciyes.cmpe.boun.edu.tr/seegridsci/scipub • Number of publications from all three VOs

  8. Application Accounting VOMS Groups • Seismology VO → OK • Meteorology VO → OK • Environmental VO • No VOMS group for CHERS • GreenView has only HU/App/Greenview but no RO/App/Greenview group – Instead there exist RO/App/ESIP?

  9. Application Accounting Number of Jobs

  10. Application Accounting Elapsed Time

  11. Application Accounting • Other applications not seen on the output • Their developers not using the VOMS properly on submissions? • Not yet implemented on the accounting portal? • Or ? • Any problem? • Total of applications << VO figures • Only in November there are 498 recorded submissions with VOMS role, but overall total for SRA jobs is only 17 according to portal (927 jobs from TR-03-METU listed in Seismo VO – almost all should belong to SRA). • Portal claims that there are 12 submissions from AM and 3 from RO, but they are collaborating to SRA. – Need to be figured out.

  12. GENESI-DR Interaction • At EGEE'09 Dorian Gorgan participated to a meeting with GENESI-DR representative Roberto Cossu. • Proposed the setting up of a pilot data repository for the development tasks of the related international projects • He was to attend the GENESI-DR Workshop on "Earth observation data policy" at Villafranca on 04.12.09 • To present the position and requirements • To iterate the proposal for the pilot data repository

  13. DNA4.3 • Leading partner: RBI • Date of the deliverable: M20 (this December)‏ • The goal of this deliverable: • Report the experience gained in the project by applications developers • Should be used to accelerate the migration of new applications to the grid • Focus will be on categorisation of porting issues for specific scientific fields

  14. DNA4.3 – Plan • Collect contributions from the partners through SEEGRID wiki pages – till 10th December • Develop new/upgrade wiki pages for Gridification Guide http://wiki.egee-see.org/index.php/SG_Gridification_Guide • Two types of contributions: • Update and correct old wiki sections (1. - 5. section)‏ • Fill-in new sections (6. - 8.)‏ • From wiki pages extract contribution for the final deliverable • New wiki sections – the core of the DNA4.3 → main contributions are expected from this sections

  15. DNA4.3 – Old Sections • Old wiki gridification guide sections should be updated • Job management • File Management and Access • Inter-job communication • Information service • Development Environments and Portals • Does not require lot of effort • Should be checked and if some changes occurred updated by contributors from SEE-GRID2

  16. DNA4.3 – New Sections • New wiki gridification guide sections • Operational tools • Application Level Services • Targeted Scientific Fields • Environmental VO • Meteo VO • Seismology VO • Contributions are expected from the application developers • Detailed description of porting techniques, used tools and services, implementation details • Should be described job mgt, data mgt. Information service used, etc.. • Describe using of existing JRA1 AS/OT

  17. DNA4.3 - Status • ToC finished - 22nd October 2009 • Wiki pages structure created - 1st December 2009 • Start collecting contributions - 1st December 2009 • Some partners has already sent their contributions: • IPB (WatG Browser)‏ • SZTAKI (Workflows, CWRE, GSSVA, USGIME, NMMC3D)‏

  18. Task NA4.4 Started in November • NA4.4 Assess applications Grid usage and take-up • Assesses and quantifies the applications usage of the infrastructure, and application take-up in the community [M19-M24] • Leader: RBI • Deliverable: DNA4.4 User community engagement and applications assessment [M24] • Lead beneficiary: RBI

  19. Action • VOMS roles should be used properly when submitting jobs onto the eInfrastructure • List of scientific events and journals should be maintained by the Vos to guide the members. • Applications should be deployed in production as soon as possible, and they should be made available to the scientific community to attract potential users. • Web pages / Wiki sections should be completed.

  20. New APs • Immediate: Contributions to DNA4.3 by 10.12.09 & Wiki updates by 31.12.09. • Work on REFS to increase success rate. • Investigate on getting seismic data from GE. • Seismo VO will complete development of EMSC interface. • CHERS should make use the of mechanisms/support offered like ASG team and RO team. • Revision/Improvement of UF papers by all application developers for submission to Earth Science Informatics special issue.

  21. New APs • VO Leaders and all, especially deployed, applications should seriously work on • User community enlargement • Collaborations with other researchers, projects, applications • Scientific (most preferably,refereed) publications • Not only per-VO, but also per-application accounting figures need to be monitored and checked; any discrepancy should be reported. • The possibility of making use of RAS JRA1 AS within NA4 will be iterated; developers of RAS can provide a sample case to demonstrate its capabilities.

More Related