1 / 4

IPv6 Initial Allocation Size Assessment Criteria - Policy Change Proposal

Learn about the proposed changes to the IPv6 addressing policy, aimed at providing large organizations with tailored allocation sizes based on specific requirements and logical structures. This policy modification seeks to address the limitations of the current provider-oriented approach and ensure efficient usage of the IPv6 address space.

dfootman
Download Presentation

IPv6 Initial Allocation Size Assessment Criteria - Policy Change Proposal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Assessment Criteria for IPv6 Initial Allocation Size Date: 13.05.2015 Alexander Brinkmann, Kaufland Informationssysteme GmbH & Co. KG Co-AuthorofPolicyProposal2015-03

  2. Motivation • Current IPv6 AddressingPolicyprovider-oriented • RIPE-246 fromyear 2002 • Qualificationforallocations larger than /29 not possiblefororganziations/companies • Requirementsof private organisationsdiffer • Internal (routing) structure • Segmentation in geography, locationtype, function,… • Nibble boundaries • Logical structuremoreimportantthanefficientusageofaddressspace

  3. Large public IPv6 addressspace • ULA areno alternative • Avoidanceof NAT • /48 prefixforeverylocation • Requiredforindividual publicrouting • RIPE NCC: Documentationandproofofusage • Not toshareinternalstructurestothecommunity • Onlysmallpartsof IPv6 range will bepublic • Largestpart in private use (like 10.0.0.0/8 in IPv4)

  4. Goal forpolicychange • ModificationofIPv6 addressingpolicy vs. • Exceptionfor large organizations • Small numberofcompaniesandorganizationswithrequirementsfor /28 andlarger • Reasonableargumentstobedefined • Examples: • Numberof /48 locations • Hierarchylevel

More Related