1 / 1

IP: Scientific Evidence in Patent Litigation Winter 2012 Prof. Morris 1/20/12 rev 0

IP: Scientific Evidence in Patent Litigation Winter 2012 Prof. Morris 1/20/12 rev 0  Comparison of two Claim Ones in two Kastenhofer Patents: 5,843,032 and 6,027,477

dian
Download Presentation

IP: Scientific Evidence in Patent Litigation Winter 2012 Prof. Morris 1/20/12 rev 0

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IP: Scientific Evidence in Patent Litigation Winter 2012 Prof. Morris 1/20/12 rev 0  Comparison of two Claim Ones in two Kastenhofer Patents: 5,843,032 and 6,027,477 Very little in these two claims is the same, and some similar things are in different places. That suggested a two column presentation, with ALL CAPS for words that appear in both claims and arrows pointing out words that appear in different places. If this were for real, rather than an example, I would separate out the language about the balloon to compare 'welded to the outer layer'with 'sealingly surrounded…'. Moral: Adapt the chart format to convey the most information about your two claims.

More Related