1 / 26

Do we really need another review of the workplace bullying literature?

Do we really need another review of the workplace bullying literature?. John Collins Candidate: Doctor of Education, UniSA. Overview. In the beginning . . . (the context) My methodology – the Twitter version The dominant discourse of the literature Its common sense & adoption

didrika
Download Presentation

Do we really need another review of the workplace bullying literature?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Do we really need another review of the workplace bullying literature? John Collins Candidate: Doctor of Education, UniSA

  2. Overview • In the beginning . . . (the context) • My methodology – the Twitter version • The dominant discourse of the literature • Its common sense & adoption • Example / ‘case study’ • Conclusion – we do need more reviews of the literature?

  3. In the beginning . . . • Joined state public service, Nov 2003 • 40 years in the workforce, never aware of bullying • Bullied to the point where I thought I was going to die • Joining the EdD program in mid-2004 was one of the things to “save” me.

  4. The context • So, workplace bullying was a natural choice for study and research . . . • and it follows that I, as a researcher and a (once) target of bullying, am not an impartial bystander

  5. So, how did I come to my methodology? • I read widely about workplace bullying and became very familiar with the literature . . . and reviews of the literature • But what I read, again and again, did not reflect (or “capture”) my experience • A breakthrough was discovering Norman Fairclough* and a literature around the ideas of power, language, ideology and text. eg ‘Language and Power’, 2001

  6. Institutional Ethnography • “to begin to understand oppression

  7. Institutional Ethnography • “to begin to understand oppression, one must be able to identify and challenge the prevailing problems in otherwise unquestioned, taken for granted, prevailing ways of knowing and acting” Campbell, 2003

  8. Institutional Ethnography • “to begin to understand oppression, one must be able to identify and challenge the prevailing problems in otherwise unquestioned, taken for granted, prevailing ways of knowing and acting” Campbell, 2003 • “an IE study identifies an area of local practice and asks ‘what is happening here?’” Grace, 2005

  9. Coming to the Lit Review A lit review is problematic for an Institutional Ethnographer – the researcher has ‘position’! Campbell and Gregor 2002 IE becomes a means of expanding people’s own knowledge rather than substituting the expert’s knowledge for our own. Smith 2005

  10. Starting the Lit Review • Reviews of the literature, form part of the literature • In general, most lit reviews: • don’t adequately cover MY experience • very similar – follow a pattern, cite the same authors, make the same general recommendations

  11. Starting the Lit Review • Although highly valuable in their own way, many research reports merely confirm, for example, that bullying occurs in this sector or that and agree, or disagree, with other or general findings • However there are also bodies of literature which stand out from the pack as ‘different’

  12. An example / case study • A 2009 authoritative, commissioned review* of the literature on workplace bullying

  13. An example / case study • A 2009 authoritative, commissioned review* of the literature on workplace bullying cites leading authors so as: • to dismiss ‘mobbing’ as an alternate term for workplace bullying • adopt a particular (for me, problematic) definition * 2009 (confidential), UniSA

  14. Consequences – mobbing • A corpus of authoritative research that treats mobbing as significantly different to bullying is overlooked. • Valuable insight from the research on mobbing including, importantly, on the ways to treat and prevent both mobbing and bullying, are ‘lost’

  15. Consequences - definition • Adopting what the author states as being “possibly the most widely cited (definition) in recent years” again dismisses a body of knowledge that takes issue with one or more aspects of the definition.

  16. Definition adopted In order for the label bullying to be applied to a particular activity it has to occur repeatedlyandregularly e.g. weeklyandover a period of time e.g. about six months. A conflict cannot be called bullying if the incident is an isolated event . . . Einarsen, et al. 2003

  17. Ignores, for example • Hockley C, UniSA,1999 • views of other cited authors (eg: Rayner) • REASONS (from the literature) why definitions are sooooo important (eg: Rigby K, UniSA, 2002) • and . . . lived experience

  18. Remember the IE question “What’s going on here?”

  19. The IE question What’s the problem?

  20. ‘Other’ literature • Academic literature  to popular or “institutional” literature • Guidelines • Policies • Media • Legislation

  21. Back to our ‘case study’ . . . “it is intuitive that developing policies and procedures . . . should contribute to improving the workplace” cf: Grogan & Dann “Perfect Policies, Putrid Practices. Workplace bullying in the public sector” UniSA, 2002 Boucaut, R “Workplace bullying: a complex organisational problem” UniSA, 2001

  22. Summary • I am partial, I have an agenda • My method of inquiry is critical and asks the question, what’s going on here? • The academic literature, while valuable, contains an hegemonic master narrative • This ‘common sense’ transfers to institutional literature

  23. Conclusion • I posed the question: Do we really need another review of the workplace bullying literature? • The answer:Yes, of course!

More Related