70 likes | 78 Views
This report explores the financial aspects and overall impacts of the grazing program on Washington State Trust Lands, including revenues, expenditures, costs, and benefits. It provides a comprehensive analysis of the program's legal and policy environment, as well as recommendations for future management options.
E N D
DNR Grazing Lands StudyProposed Final Report Joint Legislative Audit & Review Committee Linda Byers September 14, 2005
State Trust Lands Used for Grazing • Washington owns some 850,000 acres of trust lands used for grazing • About half used primarily for grazing • About half are forested lands with grazing secondary • In the 2004 Capital Budget, Legislature asked JLARC to look into the question “Does the grazing program make money for the trust beneficiaries?”
Grazing Study Has 3 Major Parts • An overview of the grazing program’s special legal and policy environment; • A narrow look at grazing program revenues and expenditures; and • A broader look at the costs and benefits associated with the grazing program.
Grazing Program Legal/Policy Environment • Two key points to remember: • The Legislature is the trustee of these and all of the state trust lands; the Legislature has selected the Department of Natural Resources to be the trust land manager. • The Challenge: The Legislature and DNR must consider current revenues for beneficiaries from the land and protecting and enhancing the land to generate revenues in the future. Report pages 5-8
A Narrow Look at Grazing Program Revenues and Expenditures • Total revenues average $590,000/yr from more than 1,200 grazing leases and permits; • 75% of revenues distributed to the beneficiaries (averaging $440,000/year) • 25% of revenues deposited into DNR’s pooled management account; • The grazing program draws more money from the pooled management account to manage the program than it puts in ($370,000/yr avg expenditures vs $149,000/yr avg deposits) • In four state comparison, Washington’s fees generally higher Report pages 9-17
Recreation Regional Jobs Ranching Jobs Land Stewardship Open Space Tradition Looking More Broadly:Grazing Program Costs & Benefits • Development of a flexible benefit cost model • Policymakers can adjust assumptions and choose which layers to include • Physical condition of the land is not quantified in the model Revenue/ Expenditures Report pages 19-26
Report’s Recommendation DNR should retain and use the benefit cost model created in this study to examine grazing lands policy and management options as needed. Since the June JLARC Meeting • DNR and OFM have concurred • Member letter to JLARC about intent to pursue grazing lands condition assessment Report pages 29-30