350 likes | 566 Views
תכנון ובעיות "קשות". בינה מלאכותית אבי רוזנפלד. יש בעיות שכנראה המחשב לא יכול לפתור. NP-Complete. P. NP. איך פותרים את הבעיה???. אין פתרון פולינומיאלי ! צריכים לבדוק כל אפשרות! BRUTE FORCE = n! תכנות דינאמי– "רק" n 2 2 n כנראה שאין פתרון "סביר" - פולינומיאלי.
E N D
תכנון ובעיות "קשות" בינה מלאכותית אבי רוזנפלד
יש בעיות שכנראה המחשב לא יכול לפתור NP-Complete P NP
איך פותרים את הבעיה??? • אין פתרון פולינומיאלי! • צריכים לבדוק כל אפשרות! • BRUTE FORCE = n! • תכנות דינאמי– "רק" n22n • כנראה שאין פתרון "סביר" - פולינומיאלי
NP-Complete דוגמאות • To prove a problem is NP-Complete show a polynomial time reduction from 3-SAT • Other NP-Complete Problems: • PARTITION • SUBSET-SUM • CLIQUE • HAMILTONIAN PATH (TSP) • GRAPH COLORING • MINESWEEPER (and many more)
רק הבעיות המעניות הם NP • Deterministic Polynomial Time: The TM takes at most O(nc) steps to accept a string of length n • Non-deterministic Polynomial Time: The TM takes at most O(nc) steps on each computation path to accept a string of length n
אז מה עושים? • Branch and Bound (כעין PRUNING) • HILLCLIMING • HEURISTICS • Mixed Integer Programming
דוגמאות CSP וCOP • Constraint Satisfaction Problems (CSP) • Constraint Optimization Problems (COP) • Backtracking search for CSP and COPs • Problem Structure and Problem Decomposition • Local search for COPs
Example: Map-Coloring • Variables WA, NT, Q, NSW, V, SA, T • Domains Di = {red, green, blue} • Constraints: adjacent regions must have different colorse.g., WA ≠ NT (if the language allows stating this so succinctly), or(WA, NT) in {(red,green), (red,blue), (green,red), (green,blue), (blue,red), (blue,green)}
Example: Map-Coloring • This is a solution: complete and consistent assignments (i.e., all variables assigned, all constraints satisfied):e.g., WA = red, NT = green, Q = red, NSW = green, V = red, SA = blue, T = green
Constraint graph • Binary CSP: each constraint relates two variables • Constraint graph: nodes are variables, arcs show constraints General-purpose CSP algorithms use the graph structure to speed up search, e.g., Tasmania is an independent subproblem
Varieties of CSPs • Discrete variables • finite domains: • n variables, domain size d impliesO(dn) complete assignments • e.g., Boolean CSPs, including Boolean satisfiability (NP-complete) • infinite domains: • integers, strings, etc. • e.g., job scheduling, variables are start/end days for each job • need a constraint language, e.g., StartJob1 + 5 ≤ StartJob3 • Continuous variables • e.g., start/end times for Hubble Space Telescope observations • linear constraints solvable in polynomial time by linear programming methods
Real-world CSPs • Assignment problems • e.g., who teaches what class? • Timetabling problems • e.g., which class (or exam) is offered when and where? • Hardware Configuration • Spreadsheets • Transportation scheduling • Factory scheduling • Floorplanning • Notice that many real-world problems involve real-valued variables
Standard search formulation (incremental) Let’s start with the straightforward (dumb) approach, then fix it. States are defined by the values assigned so far. • Initial state: the empty assignment { } • Successor function: assign a value to an unassigned variable that does not conflict with current assignment fail if no legal assignments • Goal test: the current assignment is complete • This is the same for all CSPs (good) • Every solution appears at depth n with n variables use depth-first search • Path is irrelevant, so can also use complete-state formulation • b = (n - l )d at depth l, hence n! · dn leaves (bad) b is branching factor, d is size of domain, n is number of variables
What This Naïve Search Would Look Like • Let’s say we had 4 variables, each of which could take one of 4 integer values At start, all unassigned ???? 4??? 3??? 2??? 1??? ?1?? ?2?? ?3?? ?4?? ??1? ??2? ??3? ??4? ???1 ???2 ???3 ???4 11?? 12?? 13?? 14?? 1?1? 1?2? 1?3? 1?4? 1??1 1??2 1??3 1??43 Etc.…terrible branching factor
שיפורים • יש כמה דרכים איך לשפר את התהליך... • איזה ענף בודקים ראשון • איזה בודקים בפעם השנייה, וכו' • האם אפשר לעצור את התהליך באמצע? • האם אפשר לנצל מידע על הבעיה? • האם אפשר לגזום העץ?
Minimum Remaining Values • Minimum remaining values (MRV): choose the variable with the fewest legal values All are the same here Two equivalent ones here Clear choice
Degree Heuristic • Tie-breaker among MRV variables • Degree heuristic: choose the variable with the most constraints on remaining variables
Least Constraining Value • Given a variable, choose the least constraining value: • the one that rules out the fewest values in the remaining variables
Most Constraining Value • Given a variable, choose the most constraining value: • This is VERY constrained, so let’s do it first…
Forward checking • Idea: • Keep track of remaining legal values for unassigned variables • Terminate search when any variable has no legal values
Problem Structure • Tasmania and mainland are independent subproblems • Subproblems identifiable as connected components of constraint graph
Iterative Algorithms for CSPs • Hill-climbing, simulated annealing typically work with “complete” states, i.e., all variables assigned • To apply to CSPs: • use complete states, but with unsatisfied constraints • operators reassign variable values • Variable selection: randomly select any conflicted variable • Value selection by min-conflicts heuristic: • choose value that violates the fewest constraints • i.e., hill-climb with h(n) = total number of violated constraints
Example: Sudoku • Variables: • Each (open) square • Domains: • {1,2,…,9} • Constraints: 9-way alldiff for each column 9-way alldiff for each row 9-way alldiff for each region
Very Important CSPs: Scheduling • Many industries. Many multi-million $decisions. Used extensively for space mission planning. Military uses. • People really care about improving scheduling algorithms! Problems with phenomenally huge state spaces. But for which solutions are needed very quickly • Many kinds of scheduling problems e.g.: • Job shop: Discrete time; weird ordering of operations possible; set of separate jobs. • Batch shop: Discrete or continuous time; restricted operation of ordering; grouping is important.
Scheduling • A set of N jobs, J1,…, Jn. • Each job j is composed of a sequence of operations Oj1,..., OjLj • Each operation may use resource R, and has a specific duration in time. • A resource must be used by a single operation at a time. • All jobs must be completed by a due time. • Problem: assign a start time to each job.
Summary • CSPs are a special kind of search problem: • states defined by values of a fixed set of variables • goal test defined by constraints on variable values • Backtracking = depth-first search with one variable assigned per node • Variable ordering (MRV, degree heuristic) and value selection (least constraining value) heuristics help significantly • Forward checking prevents assignments that guarantee later failure • Constraint propagation (e.g., arc consistency) does additional work to constrain values and detect inconsistencies • The CSP representation allows analysis of problem structure • Tree-structured CSPs can be solved in linear time • Iterative min-conflicts is usually effective in practice