210 likes | 346 Views
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ON AREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department. OUTLINE. THE STANDARDS – Benchmarked and Enhanced GUIDELINES ON THE STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR THE NINE AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT
E N D
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT ONAREA 1, 2 AND 3 Prepared By: Nor Aizar Abu Bakar Quality Academic Assurance Department
OUTLINE • THE STANDARDS – Benchmarked and Enhanced • GUIDELINES ON THE STANDARDS AND CRITERIA FOR THE NINE AREAS OF EVALUATION FOR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT • Vision , Mission, Educational Goals and Learning Outcomes • Curriculum Design and Delivery • Assessment of Students • Student Selection and Support Services • Academic Staff • Educational Resources • Programme Monitoring and Review • Leadership, Governance and Administration • Continual Quality Improvement
AREA 1- VISION, MISSION, EDUCATIONAL GOALS AND LEARNING OUTCOMES
AREA 1.1: Statement of Vision, Mission and Educational Goals
AREA 1.2 Participation in the Formulation of Vision, Mission & Educational Goals
Area 2.1 -Curriculum Design & Teaching - Learning (T-L)Methods • musthave its defined process for curriculum establishment , review and evaluation • The Programme must only be considered after a needs assessment has indicate d there is a need for them to be conducted • must be considered only after resources to support it identified • Aims and objectives of all programmes must be consistent with the HEP vision and mission • The Curriculumshould encourage multi-disciplinary approaches to enhance personal development of students • Theneeds analysis should involve external sources feedback • Co-curricular activities should be there to enrich student experience • The Programme Content , approach & T-L Methods mustbe appropriate, consistent , and support the achievement of programme learning outcomes • Teaching-learning activities must be consistent with the curriculum • mustbe a variety of T-L methods in order to achieve the eight domains of learning outcomes
The Programme Content & Delivery must • be regularly reviewed and evaluated and its results utilised to assure quality (must involve external examiners – for MQF level 6 and above ) • The Students must : • be provided with the most current written information of programme aims, out-line, learning outcomes and assessment methods • The Programme must : • have a coordinator and a team of appropriate academic staff • have authority and established procedures for planning & monitoring • be given adequate resources for implementation and evaluation for quality improvement Area 2.3 - Management of the Programme The Students The Programme Team The Programme