60 likes | 200 Views
March FY13 PB (Version 82). Per CoG / SecAF /TAG direction, this is the requested alternative to the FY13 PB We have taken a pragmatic approach that increases combat capability while rebalancing the manpower and force structure cuts from the FY13 PB
E N D
March FY13 PB (Version 82) • Per CoG/SecAF/TAG direction, this is the requested alternative to the FY13 PB • We have taken a pragmatic approach that increases combat capability while rebalancing the manpower and force structure cuts from the FY13 PB • ANG and AF both share in this new plan, with ANG reducing full time manpower and re-missioning within the ANG, and AD shifting force structure to ANG • This Alternative accomplishes the following: • Exceeds OSD directed FY13 and FYDP savings and preserves operational force structure • Decreases operational risk by increasing surge capacity • Preserves the experience of total force Airmen and their technical expertise at reduced cost • Leverages the reserves component to increase fighter pilot absorption
FACER March FY13 PB Actions • In FY 12 the AC/RC mix CAF and MAF was 58%/42% and 51%/49%, respectively • However, the 13 PB changed the AC/RC mix (CAF & MAF) to 62%/38% and 54%/46%, respectively • This option brings the AC/RC mix (CAF & MAF) back to 57%/43% and 53%/47%, respectively • The AD end strength in FY 12 was 332,800, the 13PB reduced it to 328,900 resulting in a reduction of 3900 personnel or 1.2%; this option reduces the AD by 6400 personnel or 1.9% • The ANG end strength in FY 12 was 106,700; the 13 PB reduced it to 101,200 resulting in a reduction of 5,500 personnel or 5.1%; this option reduces the ANG by 2,000 personnel or 1.8% • This option adjusts the force structure reductions of the AD and ANG from 1.2% and 5.1% to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively • The total number of ANG Wings will not change from the planned 13PB reduction
March FY13 PB • All manpower number are approximate • AD manpower numbers are planning factor only • Subject to HAF A1M validation
FACER March FY13 PB Actions • TOP BANNER: The$700M FYDP savings are milpers savings • LEFT BOX: The net effect on the ANG is an increase of 4 F-16 units, 1 C-130 unit, and a plus up of existing KC-135 units. • The ANG will still fly and fund the manpower for the MC-12 mission internally but change the wings receiving the mission • The ANG will still fly and fund 2 of the 4 RPA missions given to the ANG in the FY13 PB. Two of the units programmed to receive RPA will stay in fighter aircraft. • RIGHT BOX: The overall shift in AC/RC mix from the current posture (FY12 PB) is 1% in the CAF and 2 % in the MAF • This option supports rotational demand; as an example, 15 ANG F-16 combat squadrons can cover 3 deployed locations with 12 aircraft continuously at 1:4 D2D (2.5 locations at 1:5 D2D) • 16 ANG C-130 squadrons can cover 3.2 deployed locations with 8 aircraft continuously at 1:4 D2D (2.7 locations at 1:5 D2D) • BOTTOM LINE: $700M FYDP savings include manpower only. This plan did not take any savings in flying hours, base operational support or infrastructure
March FY13 PB Way Ahead • TAG VTC with NGB (2 Mar, 1300) • CNBG/DANG engages with SECDEF/AF Top 4 (TBD) • Engage with HAF A8/A9 (TBD) • AF Validates Cost Savings (Recommend NLT 8 Mar) • Present Plan to SECDEF (NLT 13 Mar) • Public Release (TBD)