270 likes | 410 Views
Physics of Ultraperipheral Nuclear Collisions. Janet Seger. Introduction to UPC physics Experimental results from RHIC Looking toward the LHC. Ultraperipheral Nuclear Collisions. Z. b > 2R. Z. Nuclei miss each other geometrically b > R 1 + R 2
E N D
Physics of Ultraperipheral Nuclear Collisions Janet Seger
Introduction to UPC physics • Experimental results from RHIC • Looking toward the LHC
Ultraperipheral Nuclear Collisions Z b > 2R Z • Nuclei miss each other geometrically • b > R1 + R2 • Long-range electromagnetic interaction • Exchange of nearly-real photon(s) • Weizsacker-Williams formalism • Photon flux ~ Z2 • Exclusive interaction • Coherent emission limits pT and energy of photon
Photon interactions • gg • Non-pert. QED • Produces lepton or quark pairs • Photonuclear • Vector Meson Dominance • Photon fluctuates to a vector meson (r, w, f) • Vector meson photoproduction -- dominant coherent process • Incoherent processes gg, gq • Shadowing, exotics
High Photon Fluxes • Photon fluxes high at ion colliders • High probability of multiple photon exchange • Vector meson can be accompanied by nuclear Coulomb excitation • 3-g exchange at lowest order • Coulomb excitation neutrons • Useful for tagging UPCs
Modeling Photonuclear Interactions Klein/Nystrand: Phenomenological model based on scaling data of gp to gA Starlight Monte Carlo agrees well with data • Photon spectrum: • Weizsäcker-Williams • Input photon-nucleon data: • parameterized from results at HERA and fixed target • Scaling gp gA: • Neglecting cross terms - g fluctuates into V which scatters elastically • Shadowing through a Glauber model • nuclear momentum transfer from form factor (excellent analytical parameterization) J. Nystrand, S. Klein nucl-ex/9811007 J. Nystrand, S. Klein PRC 60(1999)014903
Starlight predictions No Breakup With Breakup (Xn,Xn) With Breakup (1n,1n) A.Baltz, S.Klein, J.Nystrand Phys. Rev. Lett. 89(2002)012301
Heavy Vector Mesons • J/Y,U • s(gpVp) calculable from pQCD • 2-gluon exchange • Sensitive probe of g(x), g2(x) • Low-mass states at high rapidity probe low x Ryskin, Roberts, Martin, Levin, Z. Phys C 76 (1997) 231, Frankfurt LL, McDermott MF, Strikman M, J. High Energy Physics 02:002 (1999) and Martin AD, Ryskin MG, Teubner T Phys.Lett. B454:339 (1999)
Kinematic range of UPCs U at LHC J/Y at LHC J/Y at RHIC • Wgp: photon-proton CM energy • x : Bjorken-x of gluon • Q2= MV2/4
Gluon shadowing suppresses VM photoproduction Blue = impulse approx. Red = leading twist shadowing FSZ, Acta Physics Polonica B34
Gluon shadowing alters rapidity dist. FSZ, Phys Lett B540 Black Impulse Approx. Red Alvero et al. gluon density Blue H1 Gluon density
Low central multiplicities “cleaner” than hadronic collisions Zero net charge Low total transverse momentum Low virtualities Narrow dN/dy peaked at mid-rapidity Large probability of multiple electromagnetic interactions Coulomb excitations Emission of neutrons Experimental Characteristics of UPCs Require: good tracking, particle ID, selective triggering
Triggering on UPCs • Typically require • Low multiplicity • Dissociation of excited nucleus (neutrons in ZDC) • Reduces statistics but increases triggering efficiency • Sometimes include • EM Calorimeter towers for J/psi • Back-to-back event topology
UPCs at RHIC • 200 GeV Au-Au collisions • kmax ~ 3 GeV, WgN ~ 35 GeV • Electron pairs, vector meson photoproduction studied so far • Proof of principle for UPC studies • Develop trigger algorithms • Test UPC models • Consistent with HERA measurements
Electron pairs STAR Pair pT Minv • 2-photon interaction • Za ~ 0.6 • Expect non-perturbative QED effects Lowest order Higher order A. J. Baltz, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 062302 466 (2008).
Coherent r photoproduction at RHIC STAR • Select coherent events with pT < 0.15 GeV/c • Mass distribution fit with • Breit-Wigner signal • Söding interference term for direct +- production • Second order polynomial to describe background A: amplitude for ρ0 B: amplitude fordirect +-
Many properties consistent with ZEUS STAR • Ratio of non-resonant to resonant pion production • 200 GeV: |B/A| = 0.84 ± 0.11 GeV -1/2 • 130 GeV: |B/A| = 0.81 ± 0.28 GeV -1/2 • No angular dependence or rapidity dependence • s-channel helicity conservation
Incoherent Production STAR • Extend pT range for measurement of ρ0production • Fit function: • Incoherent production • d = 8.8 ±1.0 GeV-2– access to the nucleon form factor • Coherent production • b = 388.4 ±24.8 GeV-2 – access to nuclear form factor • s(incoh)/s(coh) ~ 0.29 ±0.03 Incoherent Coherent To the pT2 range: (0.002,0.3) GeV2
Model predictions for r cross section • Klein, Nystrand: vector dominance model (VDM) & classical mechanical approach for scattering, based on γp→ρp experiments results • PRC 60 (1999) 014903 • Frankfurt, Strikman, Zhalov: generalized vector dominance model + Gribov-Glauber approach • PRC 67 (2003) 034901 • Goncalves, Machado: QCD dipole approach (nuclear effects and parton saturation phenomenon) • Eur.Phys.J. C29 (2003) 271-275
Energy and A-dependence of r cross section 62 GeV Au-Au 200 GeV d-Au STAR Preliminary STAR Preliminary STAR Preliminary 62 GeV
Excited r state(s) STAR preliminary • γAu ρπ+ π– π+ π– • STAR observes broad peak around 1510 MeV/c2 • May be production of excited states r(1450) and/or r(1700)
dN/dmee (background subtracted) w/ fit to (MC) expected dielectron continuum and J/Ψ signals J/Psi at RHIC (PHENIX) D’Enterria, nucl-ex/0601001
Large error bars! Need more/better data Comparison with Theory D’Enterria, nucl-ex/0601001 Strikman, et al., Phys. Lett B626
UPCs at the LHC • 2.75 TeV Pb beams • kmax = 81 GeV, Wgp ~ 950 GeV • Compared to RHIC: • Greater energy • Greater photon flux • Increased cross sections • Lower x
New UPC physics at the LHC • Elastic Vector Meson production • g+A J/Y +A • expected prod rate ~ 1x107/ year • g+A U +A • expected prod rate ~ 1x105/ year • sensitive probe of g(x,Q2) • Photonuclear production of heavy quarks • g+gcc • Photonuclear jet production; photon+partonjet+jet; e.g. g+g q+q • R. Vogt hep-ph/0407298, M. Strikman, R. Vogt, S. White PRL 96(2006)082001.
LHC detectors ALICE CMS ATLAS Very good tracking, PID Extends to pT =0.05 GeV/c, but |h| < 1 No ZDC trigger Tracking to |h| < 2.4, but pT > 0.2 GeV/c Good rapidity coverage– can measure rapidity gaps Tracking to |h| < 2.4, but pT > 0.5 GeV/c Good rapidity coverage– can measure rapidity gaps
Conclusions • UPCs allow study of photon-induced interactions • Low-multiplicity environment • Can be separated from hadronic background • RHIC and LHC are high-luminosity gA colliders • RHIC energies comparable to HERA • LHC energies will extend beyond • Experience at RHIC • demonstrated feasibility of UPC studies • Developed trigger algorithms • r and J/Y cross sections • Agreement with HERA results • LHC will probe interesting new physics • Higher energy, lower x • Shadowing effects, jets