1 / 6

Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia November 2010

Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia November 2010. NAT64 for DSMIPv6 IETF 79. http:// tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-behave-mext-nat64-dsmip-01.txt. Problem Statement. IPv6-only mobile node NAT64 Pref A for IPv4-only server in domain A

dirk
Download Presentation

Behcet Sarikaya Frank Xia November 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. BehcetSarikayaFrank XiaNovember 2010 NAT64 for DSMIPv6IETF 79 http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-sarikaya-behave-mext-nat64-dsmip-01.txt

  2. Problem Statement IPv6-only mobile node NAT64 Pref A for IPv4-only server in domain A MN moves to domain B where NAT64 Pref B for the same IPv4-only server, MN continues to use the same synthetic IPv6 address so the packet will not get translated Or MN does DNS query locally gets Pref B then IPv6 packets take longer path MN initiates RO, sends HoTI NAT64 drops No multicast support NAT keep-alives drain MN battery

  3. Solution MN mobility is handled by DSMIPv6 DNS64 no change HA keeps NAT64 state linked to the binding cache but NAT64 can be a separate box Handover operations HA instead of MN does keep-alives by sending ICMPv6 Echo Request messages

  4. Why is it relevant to Mext? • IPv6-only MN behaviour is not defined and this draft defines it • DSMIPv6 (RFC 5555) defines IPv4-only MN • DSMIPv6 does not define multicast support • This draft defines multicast support for IPv6-only MN • Based on bidirectional tunneling approach defined in MIPv6 • HA supports IGMP and MLD/IGMP packet translation • Both ASM and SSM are supported

  5. Next Steps Is there interest in WG?

  6. Thank you

More Related