1 / 7

UN/CEFACT Registry: Registration, Storage, and Publication of Deliverables

This report highlights the implementation plan for the UN/CEFACT Registry, focusing on the registration, storage, and publication of UN/CEFACT deliverables. It discusses the functional specification, proof-of-concept testing, and operational considerations of the registry.

dkhan
Download Presentation

UN/CEFACT Registry: Registration, Storage, and Publication of Deliverables

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. UN/CEFACT Registry David DOBBING, ICG Vice Chair http://www.cen.eu/uncefactforum/ICG/ UN/CEFACT Registry Report

  2. Background • Project initiated by the ICG, Sept 2004 • functional specification of the UN/CEFACT Registry • focus on registration, storage, and publication of UN/CEFACT deliverables: • directory components, library components, and technical specifications • initial draft  final publication • information submission • information validation • information access and retrieval • registry administration • based on OASIS ebXML registry standards • ebRS – ebXML Registry Services and Protocols • ebRIM – ebXML Registry Information Model • undertake proof-of-concept / prototype implementations • team leads: • Fabrice Bourge – Orange (formerly France Telecom) • Ivan Bedini – Orange (formerly France Telecom) UN/CEFACT Registry Report

  3. Recent Progress • Finalization of UN/CEFACT Registry Implementation Requirements Specification, V1.2 • Pursued proof of concept testing with ICG members from: • Europe • North America • Asia (2x) • First draft of the implementation requirements plan for the UN/CEFACT Registry • Clarified Registry Versioning concepts • Advanced Registry Interface/Connector approach UN/CEFACT Registry Report

  4. The Big Picture UN/CEFACT Registry Report

  5. Workflow UN/CEFACT Registry TBG WG ATG DraftStatus Working area External Organisations submit TBG 17 ATG SubmittedStatus Validation area approve UN/CEFACT Registered Users ICG Approved Status Pre-publication area publish Published Status Publication area All Users UN/CEFACT Registry Report

  6. Implementation Plan • Registry is fundamental to the ongoing evolution of UN/CEFACT • vehicle for the registration, storage and publication of all UN/CEFACT deliverables • leverage Internet based technologies and collaborative based work practices • future support for federation with other compliant registries • First Draft of Implementation Plan under review • further consideration of a phased implementation approach • start simple, evolve over time • Operational Considerations: • 7 day, 24 hour, availability • restricted access by some 500 UN/CEFACT members • open access by some 1000 users per day • management of some 2000 plus artifacts per year UN/CEFACT Registry Report

  7. Implementation Plan Cont. • Indicative Costs • One Time 650 K€ • Development of application software • Excludes hardware • Annual Recurring 270 K€ • Operations / support / hotline • Refine & Approve Implementation Plan • Phased Implementation • Review implementation options • Qualify Development & Operational Costs • Qualify Resource requirements • Seek UN/CEFACT Plenary Support UN/CEFACT Registry Report

More Related