330 likes | 342 Views
Four Sub-dimensions of Stereotypes: Evidence from Romania and a Seven-Culture Test of Structure Reliability. Adrian Stanciu , Christin-Melanie Vauclair , Yasin Koc, Diana Miconi , Diana Farcas , Resit Kislioglu , Nicole Rodda. Stereotypes are:.
E N D
Four Sub-dimensions of Stereotypes: Evidence from Romania and a Seven-Culture Test of Structure Reliability Adrian Stanciu, Christin-Melanie Vauclair, Yasin Koc, Diana Miconi, Diana Farcas, Resit Kislioglu, Nicole Rodda
Stereotypes are: Beliefs about characteristics, attributes, and behaviors (Hilton & von Hippel, 1996, p.240) About relevant (members) social groups (Oakes, Turner, & Haslam, 1991) Socially shared(e.g. Peters & Kashima, 2007; Leigh & Fine, 1999)
Stereotypes have: Warmth – one’s sociability Competence – one’s ability (Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002)
Social groups on Warmth and Competence Fiske, Cuddy, Glick, & Xu, 2002, Fig. 1, p. 885
Recent developments:In-group stereotypes Warmth – one’s sociability Competence – one’s ability Morality – one’sethics Leach, Ellemers, & Baretto, 2007
Recent developments:An assumption Communion – Sociability & Morality Agency – Competence & Dynamism Szymkow, Chandler, Ijerman, Parzuchowski, & Wojciszke, 2013
A more complex structure Do the warmth and competence dimensions of stereotypes about out-groups have a sub-component structure?
A sub-component structure Studies 1 & 2: Data driven exploration in Romania Study 3: A seven nation test Study 4: Specificity of Romanian culture?
Data driven exploration Stanciu, Cohrs, Hanke, & Gavreliuc, 2016. Manuscript under review.
Study 1: A statistical exploration Stanciu, 2015
Data driven exploration Stanciu, Cohrs, Hanke, & Gavreliuc, revision submitted, May 2016
Study 1: A statistical exploration Stanciu, 2015
Study 1: A statistical exploration Note. Scale reliabilities on main diagonal; data pooled after 2 social groups Stanciu, 2015
Study 2: A replication 23 social groups Diligent to Concientiousness (Stanciu, Cohrs, Hanke, & Gavreliuc, 2016) Stanciu, 2015
Study 2: A replication Note. Scale reliabilities on main diagonal; data pooled after 23 social groups Stanciu, 2015
Study 2: A replication Stanciu, 2015 Stanciu, 2015
Studies 1 & 2: Evidence from Romania Stanciu, 2015 Warmth –Friendliness & Trustworthiness Competence –Conscientiousness & Efficacy
Study 3: A seven-nation test Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, Manuscript in preparation Is there evidence for the friendliness-trustworthiness and conscientiousness-efficacy structure of stereotypes across nations?
Study 3: A seven-nation test Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, Manuscript in preparation
Study 3: A seven-nation test Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, 2015. Manuscript in preparation All measures back-translated
Study 3: A seven-nation test Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, 2015. Manuscript in preparation All measures back-translated Target groups: Unemployed people, Women, Homosexuals, Politicians, & Rich people
Study 3: A seven-nation test Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, Manuscript in preparation All measures back-translated Target groups: Unemployed people, Women, Homosexuals, Politicians, & Rich people Friendliness: Likeable, Warm, & Amusing Trustworthiness: Good-natured, Well-intentioned, & Honest Conscientiousness: Conscientious, Organized, & Diligent Efficacy: Competent, Efficient, & Independent
4 Sub-dimensions Stanciu, 2016. Manuscript in preparation
4 Sub-Components: A seven-nations test Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, Manuscript in preparation
4 Sub-Components: A seven-nations test Freed intercepts Friendliness = likeable & warm Trustworthiness = good-natured & honest Efficaciousness = competence & efficacy Conscientiousness = organized & diligence Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, Manuscript in preparation
4 Sub-Components: Specificity of Romanian Culture? Note. RO = Romanian locals; DE = German locals; FR = French locals; ro in DE = Romanian migrants in Germany; ro in FR = Romanian migrants in France; CFI = Comparative Fit Index; TLI = Tucker-Lewis Index; RMSEA = Root Mean Square Error of Approximation; SRMR = Standardized Square Error of Approximation; n.a. = not applicable; Stanciu, Manuscript in preparation
Conclusions Stanciu, 2015; Stanciu, Vauclair, Koc, Miconi, Farcas, Kislioglu, & Rodda, manuscript in preparation; Stanciu, manuscript in preparation Warmth –Friendliness & Trustworthiness Competence –Conscientiousness & Efficacy Atm, no evidence for across-nations (failed scalar equivalence) Recurrent evidence for Romanian culture
Future directions Theory based approach to the study of the 4 sub-dimensions Explore the reasons why it is highly relevant to Romanian culture Can a nation’s societal climate explain why a particular sub-dimension is more important than another? Evolutionary arguments?
Four sub-components of stereotypes Thank you! stanciu@bigsss-bremen.de Acknowledgments: Christopher Cohrs, Katja Hanke, Georgi Dragolov, Alisia Muresan, & Daniela Dumulescu