60 likes | 80 Views
Join the debate on whether "Children should be seen and not heard" in 1940s England. Compare adult attitudes and engage in a reasoned judgment. Interactive session recalling past events and envisioning a lively debate.
E N D
WALT: consider two sides of an argument to reach a reasoned judgement. Tuesday 20th September 2016
WALT: consider two sides of an argument to reach a reasoned judgement. • Let’s recap what happened in the last session. • What was wrong with the officer who turned up at Hamleigh Farm?
WALT: consider two sides of an argument to reach a reasoned judgement. • Think back to when David and Tucky were in the village hall at the end of Chapter 2 and the adults were talking amongst themselves. How did the adults treat David and Tucky then? • How is this similar or different to the officer? • What about how Mr. Reynold’s was spoken to by Miss Evers and by the officer? • How did Mr. Reynolds respond to the other adults?
WALT: consider two sides of an argument to reach a reasoned judgement. ‘Children should be seen and not heard’ 1940’s England was obviously very different to nowadays but the expression has never really gone away. You are going to be split into two- with half of you AGREEING with the statement and half of you DISAGREEING with the statement.
WALT: consider two sides of an argument to reach a reasoned judgement. ‘Children should be seen and not heard’ 1940’s England was obviously very different to nowadays but the expression has never really gone away. Use Kidrex to safe search some articles on this topic. It is difficult to argue for a side you don’t believe in but give it a go!
WALT: consider two sides of an argument to reach a reasoned judgement. ‘Children should be seen and not heard’ 1940’s England was obviously very different to nowadays but the expression has never really gone away. At the end of the session we’ll have a debate! You need to come ready with ideas! https://padlet.com/mrcbirch/qa4p4h7c684o