1 / 15

Modeling Quench Evolution and Recovery in Cryogenic Systems without Cold Buffer

This document presents modeling of quench evolution and recovery in cryogenic systems without cold buffers, focusing on parameters, heat load correlation, warm buffer temperature, quench recovery analysis, and cooldown procedures. The study includes simulations, assumptions, and results for efficient system operation.

dminch
Download Presentation

Modeling Quench Evolution and Recovery in Cryogenic Systems without Cold Buffer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HL-LHC IT String Cryogenic meeting #2Modeling of quench evolution and recovery with Ecosim and other methods – cases without cold buffer A. Wanninger CERN, 4th April 2019

  2. Quench evolution – EcoSIM model • Considered parameters and initial conditions – no quench buffer:

  3. Quench evolution – EcoSIM model • Other parameters and modeling choices: • Perfect heat transfer between helium and metal in cold mass • Perfect heat transfer between helium and warm buffer wall (25 mm thick) • All valves are control valves that are controlled by proportional controllers. • QRV is opens at 17 bara and reaches the full lift at 20 bara. It closes again at 16 bara. • Valve to warm buffer is ,opens at 13 bara and reaches the full lift at 14.2 bara. It closes again at 11.8 bara.

  4. Quench evolution – Heat load vs time • Development of a correlation to estimate the heat load to the total cold mass over time • 1st step: Exponential correlation for LHC string full quench (15.3 MJ) • Conditions and assumptions: • Quench time of 120s • Isochoric heating to 18 bar within 6 seconds (according to measurements) • Estimated initial heat load in the correlation: Pressure vs time: Measurement (top) and Ecosim model results with developed correlation Developed exponential correlation

  5. Quench evolution – Heat load vs time • 2nd step: Extrapolation to HL String full quench (39.07 MJ) • Simple up-scaling by the ratio of energies is not appropriate because heat load from coil to cold mass is proportional to and: • between coil and cold mass does not increase by this factor. Estimation of increase done by Rob van Weelderen. • is likely to be reduced in magnets compared to magnets. • Heat transfer from coils to cold mass will be slower • New approach (assumptions): • Initial heat load in the correlation: 600 kW • Quench time: 180 s • Lower energy quenches are scaled down (energy ratio).

  6. Quench evolution – 39 MJ quench simulation: p, T, and ṁ

  7. Quench evolution – 39 MJ quench simulation, m and E * Energy fraction values do not sum up exactly to 1 because of a slight difference in the heat capacity data for stainless steel in Ecosim and the correlation used to calculate the indicated value.

  8. Quench evolution – 22 MJ quench simulation, summary * Energy fraction values do not sum up exactly to 1 because of a slight difference in the heat capacity data for stainless steel in Ecosim and the correlation used to calculate the indicated value.

  9. Focus on warm buffer • Calculation of minimum possible temperature of warm buffer • Assumptions for buffer: • Existing 80 reservoir (1296617_V1_RESERVOIR__80m3_He) • 25 t steel mass • Operating temperature: minimum not to be exceeded after quench • Assumptions for calculations: • Initial temperature of buffer: • Perfect heat transfer between Helium and buffer wall and perfect conduction inside steel wall • No heat external heat source (no heat-up of the reservoir wall or Helium by the atmosphere) • 39 MJ quench • All valves open fully at their respective opening pressures (17 bara and 13 bara) and remain open • Results: • Final temperature in warm buffer is • If all gaseous Helium (220 kg) at 4.5 K was dumped into the buffer, about would be reached.

  10. Quench recovery – pumping down to 4.5 K GHe • Analysis of quench recovery time by pumping • Relevant parameters: • Amount of quench energy expelled through quench valve • Temperature of cold mass and GHe after quench • Maximum and best-estimate values • Flush factor included (conservative) • Analytical analysis (excel) * The cooldown is performed with 18 g/s (at 35 mbar including pressure drop in line B) down to 2.1 K , then with 12 g/s (at 25 mbar including pressure drop in line B) down to 2.0 K, and finally with 6 g/s (at 14 mbar including pressure drop in line B) down to 1.9 K.

  11. Refill from GHe to LHe at 4.5 K • Limitations: • Total liquid mass flow at 4.5 K provided by cold box: 25 g/s • Maximum pumping capacity: 18 g/s • Refill with LHe at 4.5 K is only possible to a certain liquid level. • Procedure to fully fill cryostat: • After open refill, the magnet cryostat is closed and the remaining GHe is condensed by pumping. • During pumping, the pressure is maintained at 1.3 bar. The density increase must be compensated for by a make-up mass flow of LHe at 4.5K. • The sum of the pumping flow and make-up flow must not exceed 25 g/s optimum can be calculated: 4.6 g/s of pumping flow and 20.4 g/s of make-up flow for any liquid level. • Total time is 2.0 hours. This is equal to the time of a full open refill.

  12. Cooldown from 4.5 K LHe to 1.9 K • Limitations: • Total liquid mass flow at 4.5 K provided by cold box: 25 g/s • Maximum pumping capacities: • 18 g/s at 2.04 K and 35 mbar including pressure drop in line B: cooldown to 2.1 K. • 12 g/s at 1.93 K and 25 mbar including pressure drop in line B: cooldown to 2.0 K. • 6 g/s at 1.76 K and 14 mbar including pressure drop in line B: cooldown to 1.9 K. • Procedure to cooldown from LHe at 4.5 K to 1.9 K: • During pumping, the pressure is maintained at 1.0 bar. • The density increase must be compensated for by a make-up mass flow of LHe at 4.5K. The density increase is terminated at about 2.4 K. • The sum of the pumping flow and make-up flow must not exceed 25 g/s optimum can be calculated: 17.5 g/s of pumping flow and 7.5 g/s of make-up flow. Required time to 2.4 K: 1.58 h. • In the further cooldown, the pumping capacity is gradually decreased:

  13. 39 MJ quench evolution

  14. 22 MJ quench evolution

  15. 6.25 MJ quench evolution

More Related