1 / 4

Motivation: Many Applications Example: Urban Crime patterns, Sensor Data, …

Spatio-Temporal Pattern Mining for Multi-Jurisdiction Multi-Timeframe (MJMT) Activity Datasets Investigators: Shashi Shekhar,(U Minnesota) Bhavani T., L. Khan(U.T.Dallas) Start Date: Summer 2007. Motivation: Many Applications Example: Urban Crime patterns, Sensor Data, …

dobry
Download Presentation

Motivation: Many Applications Example: Urban Crime patterns, Sensor Data, …

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Spatio-Temporal Pattern Miningfor Multi-Jurisdiction Multi-Timeframe (MJMT) Activity DatasetsInvestigators: Shashi Shekhar,(U Minnesota) Bhavani T., L. Khan(U.T.Dallas) Start Date: Summer 2007 • Motivation: Many Applications • Example: Urban Crime patterns, Sensor Data, … • Pattern Families: Hotspots, Journey to crime, trends, … • Tasks: Crime Prevention, Patrol routes/schedule, … • Problem Definition • Inputs: (i) Activity reports with location and time • Pattern families • Output: Pattern instances • Objective Function: Accuracy, Scalability • Constraints:Urban transportation network

  2. Challenge 1: Spatio-Temporal (ST) Nature of Patterns • State of the Art: Environmental Criminology • Spatial Methods: Hotspots, Spatial Regression • Space-time interaction (Knox test) • Critical Barriers: richer ST semantics • Ex. Trends, periodicity, displacement • Approach: • Categorize pattern families • Quantify: interest measures • Design scalable algorithms • Evaluate with crime datasets • Challenges: Trade-off b/w • Semantic richness and • Scalable algorithms High activity: 2300 -0000 hrs Rings = weekdays; Slices = hour (Source: US Army ERDC, TEC)

  3. 2: Activites on Urban Infrastructure ST Networks • State of the Art: Environmental Criminology • Largely geometric Methods • Few Network Methods: Journey to Crime (J2C) • Critical Barriers: • Scale: Houston – 100,000 crimes / year • Network based explanation • Spatio-temporal networks • Approaches: • Scalable algorithms for J2C analysis • Network based explanatory models • Time-aggregated graphs (TAG) • Challenges: Key assumptions violated! • Ex. Prefix optimality of shortest paths • Can’t use Dijktra’s, A*, etc. (a) Input: Pink lines connect crime location & criminal’s residence (b) Output: Journey- to-Crime (thickness = route popularity) Source: Crimestat

  4. N2 N3 N4 N5 N1 R3 R1 R2 Transition Edge Road Intersections Subway Stations 3: Multi-Jurisdiction Multi-Temporal (MJMT) Data • State of the Art: • Spatial, ST ontologies • Few network ontologies • Critical Barriers: • Heterogeneity across networks • Uncertainty – map accuracy, gps, … • Approach: • Ontologies: ST Network activities • Integration methods: MJMT data • Location accuracy models • Challenges: • Test datasets • Evaluation methods

More Related