550 likes | 714 Views
TfR Seminar: Session 5. Introduction to Inquiry-Based Science Instruction. Do Now! (3 min). Take out all session 5 Handouts, please! Select Handouts 4.11and 4.12: Math Strategy Implementations Planning and Reflection Sheets.
E N D
TfR Seminar: Session 5 Introduction to Inquiry-Based Science Instruction
Do Now! (3 min) • Take out all session 5 Handouts, please! • Select Handouts 4.11and 4.12: Math Strategy Implementations Planning and Reflection Sheets. • Review your work and prepare to discuss your reflection in a group
Take Out HO 5.1 • (1 min) Silent read instructions
Reviewing the Strategy Debrief • Using HO 5.1 • Assemble in your Strategy Implementation Group as listed below: • Emma, Chris and Laura • Will , Ann Marie and Ashley • Eric Wendy and Adrianna • Jessica, Jeffrey and Caitlin • Alison, and Travis • Michael and Blake • Complete the Strategy Implementation Routine(10 min)
Reflect on Strategy • How does this process contribute to success in your classroom? • Strategy Planning Implementation and Reflection Sheets should be kept as they will be needed for session 15
Transition • This session will focus on scientific inquiry as it relates to students learning, classroom instruction and assessment • You have read about Inquiry for homework but have not yet dug down into this important topic • The next section will focus on the value of inquiry-based instruction
Section 1: The Inquiry Approach and the Nature of Science • Take out HO 5.2 • (3 min) Complete column #1 of the anticipation guide • (recall, we learned about this strategy in session 3) • Read the statements and record your level of agreement with each statement. • We will complete the column #2 later in the session
What is the Benefit of using an anticipation guide? • To your students? • To you, as the teacher?
Making the Case for Inquiry • Take out HO 4.19 Your notes sheet for your reading homework on HO 4.20 • Please note the value of guided notes sheets, especially for struggling readers. • Can anyone volunteer a time when they used a strategy like this in their classroom?
Making the Case for Inquiry • Note the 3 charts hanging on the wall. • (30 sec) Bring HO 4.19 and 4.20 with you and assemble in groups of 4-5 at one of the charts. • (30 sec)Read the statement on the chart, which is an argument against the inquiry approach • (2 min)Discuss the statement with your group • (2 min) Construct counter arguments, writing them on the chart • Select1 person to share your defense
Share out • (2 min/group) Defend your statement!
Key Take-Aways • Research shows promising results with inquiry-based instruction • Maximizes learning because it targets critical thinking skills and inquiry skills, impacting learning for understanding • Teachers must scaffold and guide inquiry to ensure that misconceptions are not reinforced or that students are not failing to connect concepts with their experience. • Inquiry can be done in a variety of ways, to maximize instructional value and time.
The Nature of Science How do scientists do their work? • (15 seconds) Think about this • Write your responses on the chart paper Hands on and Minds on for a demonstration! • Think about how you could add to this list as you watch
Making Observations • Form the following pairs: • Emma and Wendy -- Blake and Adrianna • Chris and Caitlin -- Laura and Ashley • Alison and Ann Marie -- Michael and Jessica • Will and Travis -- Eric and Jeffrey • (1 min) Make observations and Write them on • Your students would use their “Science Notebook” • (1 min)Discuss your observations with your partner
Making Predictions • What will happen when the entire beaker is submerged into the water? • ( 1min) Share thoughts with your partner • Write them in box 2 of HO 5.3
Testing Predictions(2 min) • Pass the beaker around • Make observations • Discuss your observations with your partner • Was your prediction correct? • Give explanation of what was observed • Write and draw your observations, explanations, and questions in BOX 3 of HO 5.3 Step out of students role: • What questions might your students have at this point?
New Predictions • What will happen now, when the entire beaker is submerged into the water? • ( 1min) Share thoughts with your partner • Write them in box 4 of HO 5.3
Testing Predictions and Drawing Conclusions (1 min) • Make observations • Discuss your observations with your partner • Was your prediction correct? • Give explanation of what was observed • Write your ideas in BOX 4 and 5 of HO 5.3
How Scientists Work • Looking back at our chart, in what ways were these things exemplified in the demonstration? • ( 1 min) Discuss this with your partner • Be prepared to share out discussion highlights and to make additions to our chart as needed • Share out
Transition • List the steps taken to conduct this demonstration • Note the importance of having students take notes on the teacher prepared graphic organizer • Facilitating inquiry requires careful preparation of materials, strategic questioning and teacher guidance. • Think through and plan for student engagement through entire process.
“Minds On” or “inquiry” learning engages students in: • Formulating original questions • Brainstorming to find answers • Critically evaluating subsequent test results • This can happen in a variety of ways, not just through labs, the two are not equal.
Evaluating Scenarios for Evidence of Inquiry • Using HO 5.4, note the definitions of the 4 levels of inquiry (1 min) –silent read • Turn and talk ( 2 min) • Discuss the differences between each level
Evaluate Inquiry Levels • ( 3 min) Working with your shoulder partner and Using Chart 2 on HO 5.4 • Evaluate the level of inquiry described in each activity • Be prepared to share and defend your answers
Planning Inquiry Activities • Turn and talk ( 2 min) • What are some steps that need to be considered when implementing successful inquiry based lessons at each of these levels? • Be prepared to share the steps needed for each level • Whip around: share one consideration for a simgle level of inquiry
Your Curriculum Resources and Inquiry • ( 5 min) Using Chart 3 on HO 5.4 and your curriculum resources • Select 1 key concept from your standards, which is related to the science process skills • Evaluate the treatment of this standard in your resource • This evaluation can be repeated for all of the process standards, • helps you understand how the resource addresses process in the content domain
Instruction Key Message • Your curriculum is a tool, you are what makes the difference! • How does considering the science process skills in the content domain, and in your curriculum inform your instruction? • The goal of the national science standards is that students engage in full inquiry!
Using Full Inquiry • Assemble in groups of 3 based on the text you read for homework • “City Park Lake Solution” • “Pendulums” • Examine the science classroom scenarios and dissect what students and participants do and say in an inquiry based classroom at different levels. • Refer to your notes on HO 4.17 You will use an inquiry approach to complete this analysis
Uncovering the Actions (10 min) • Using two different colored sticky notes, identify the actions/ behaviors of the teachers and the students, like an observation. • Teachers: yellow • Students: other color • Then organize the sticky notes into groups of like behaviors, on chart paper and write a descriptive name of each set. • Post chart paper
Example • Yellow sticky note 1: use timer • Yellow sticky note 2: measure worm length • Yellow sticky note 3: weigh each bowl of water measuring
Gallery Walk and Discussion • An example of how students might share findings Gallery Walk (1 min per poster) • Observe grouping and naming • Discuss choices and take notes on HO 4.17
Understanding Inquiry-Based Instruction • In your groups • ( 5 min) Discuss the questions on HO 5.5 • Reflect on your understanding of inquiry based science instruction
1. 2. 3.
Share • ( 3 min) Share Reflections How does this compare with our brainstorm list of what scientists do? • How can teachers strategically implement inquiry based instruction to differentiate instruction and maximize instructional time?
Re-adjusting Our Thinking • You have experienced inquiry through several strategies: the nature of science demo, the levels of inquiry match-up and the organize and name activity • True inquiry involves allowing students to experiences all three of these strategies. • (2 min)Revisit anticipation guide HO 5.2 • Record changes in thinking in column 3 and justification in column 4 CFU
Section 3: The Inquiry Process; A Review and Rubrics for Scientific Investigations Review the assessment key message and the science content domain poster • What role does assessment play in closing the achievement gap? • Why is the inquiry process located where it is on the content domain poster?
HO 5.6; The Overview of the Inquiry Process • ( 1min)Review the right column of the chart • We will collect data on a small group of students, to learn how to go through this process. • It is essential to collect data and monitor progress on all of the students in the identified group. • (5 min)With your shoulder partner, review the steps in HO 5.6 • Note some questions and concerns that you have about this process on sticky notes and put them in the parking lot. • We will be addressing them in coming sessions
What is Next? • Today we will examine a lab investigations rubric, as a measure for monitoring progress on inquiry process skills. • We will understand the components of a solid lab report and the skills that students use • By session 6 you will have assigned and graded a lab report using this rubric • During session 6 we will analyze the data from these labs
Intro to the Scoring Rubric • (1 min)Organize yourselves into like-content groups • Create an overview of the components of a lab investigation and brainstorm criteria for each component of the lab • using HO 5.7 in the column labeled “Criteria” • According to the following example
Complete Criteria 10 minutes for the following! • Complete column 2 of HO 5.7 • Compare your criteria to those listed on the rubrics for the grade-level you teach, modify the rubric as you see fit. • Write comparisons and questions on column 3 of HO 5.7 • Compare to appropriate rubric on HO 5.8 • Note the start of the year and the end of the year expectations • You may not use all aspects of the rubric right away as you will need to scaffold your instruction up to level 4 of inquiry
Debrief • (3 min) • Would all of the criteria you created apply to every inquiry-based learning experience in your classroom? • Which of the science process skills would not be evident in a written lab report? How else could they be assessed?
Practice Using The Rubric • Using HO 5.9 and HO 5.8( HS end of year) • (5 min) Work in your groups to score a lab report using the rubric on 5.8 • Steps • For each component on the lab rubric, discuss and determine which criteria are met and highlight them. • Score 1-4 for each and write it in column 3 of HO 5.10 (highlighting allows for holistic, visual overview of areas of strength and weakness, for students)
More Practice Using The Rubric (5 min) • Using HO 5.11, 5.12 and HO 5.8(End of year rubric) • Score the lab independently (2 min) • Record scores on HO 5.12 • Compare with group members ( 4 min) • Discuss discrepancies. • Be prepared to share out highlights of discussion