1 / 14

Researched Writing

Researched Writing. Evaluating Sources. Evaluating Sources . Evaluating All Sources Signs of bias Assessing an argument Evaluating Web Sources Authorship Sponsorship Purpose and Audience Currency. CHECKING FOR SIGNS OF BIAS.

domingue
Download Presentation

Researched Writing

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Researched Writing Evaluating Sources

  2. Evaluating Sources • Evaluating All Sources • Signs of bias • Assessing an argument • Evaluating Web Sources • Authorship • Sponsorship • Purpose and Audience • Currency

  3. CHECKING FOR SIGNS OF BIAS • Does the author or publisher have political leanings or religious views that could affect objectivity? • Is the author or publisher associated with a special-interest group, such as Greenpeace or the National Rifle Association, that might see only one side of an issue?

  4. Signs of Bias, Con’t. • How fairly does the author treat opposing views? • Does the author’s language show signs of Bias?

  5. ASSESSING AN ARGUMENT • What is the author’s central claim or thesis? • How does the author support this claim – with relevant and sufficient evidence or with just a few anecdotes or emotional examples?

  6. Assessment, Con’t. • Are statistics accurate? Have they been used fairly? (It is possible to “lie” with statistics by using them selectively or by omitting mathematical details.) • Are any of the author’s assumptions questionable?

  7. Assessment, Con’t. • Does the author consider opposing arguments and refute them persuasively? • Does the author fall prey to any logical fallacies?

  8. EVALUATING WEB SOURCES • Caution: If the sponsorship and the authorship of a site are both unclear, be extremely suspicious of the site.

  9. AUTHORSHIP • Is there an author? You may need to do some clicking and scrolling to find the author’s name. If you are on an internal page of a site, for example, you may need to go to the home page or click on an “about this site” link to learn the name of the author.

  10. Authorship, con’t. • If there is an author, can you tell whether he or she is knowledgeable and credible? When the author’s qualifications aren’t listed on the site itself, look for links to a home page, which may provide evidence of the author’s interests and expertise.

  11. SPONSORSHIP • Who, if anyone, sponsors the site? The sponsor or a site is often named and described on the home page. • What does the domain name tell you? The domain name often specifies the type of group hosting the site: commercial (.com), educational (.edu), nonprofit (.org), military (.mil), or network (.net).

  12. PURPOSE AND AUDIENCE • Why was the site created: to argue a position? to sell a product? to inform readers? • Who is the site’s intended audience? If you do not fit the audience profile, is information on the site still relevant to your topic?

  13. CURRENCY • How current is the site? Check for the date of publication or the latest update. • How current are the site’s links? If many of the links no longer work, the site may be too dated for your purposes.

  14. ON THE WEB For links to resources that will help you evaluate sources you find on the Web, go to: www.dianahacker.com/bedhandbook and click on > Links Library >Conducting Research

More Related