1 / 12

Reaffirmation of IEEE 802.15.1-2005

Review of sponsor ballot results for the reaffirmation of IEEE Std 802.15.1-2005, with the purpose of submitting the results to IEEE-SA RevCom for final approval.

donaldburton
Download Presentation

Reaffirmation of IEEE 802.15.1-2005

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Project: IEEE P802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Reaffirmation of IEEE 802.15.1-2005] Date Submitted: [15July10] Source: [John R. Barr] Company [JRBarr, Ltd. & Bluetooth SIG] Address [21939 Old Farm Road, Deer Park, IL 60010 USA] Voice:[(847) 962-5407], FAX: [none], E-Mail:[John.Barr@me.com] Abstract: [Review of sponsor ballot results for reaffirmation of IEEE Std 802.15.1-2005] Purpose: [Approve submission of reaffirmation results to IEEE-SA RevCom for final approval.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P802.15. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P802.15. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  2. Overview • IEEE standards must be amended, revised, or reaffirmed at least once every 5 years. • IEEE Std 802.15.1-2005 was up for reaffirmation in 2010. • John Barr was assigned the task of handling the reaffirmation sponsor ballot. • The sponsor balloting is now completed and the results need to be submitted to RevCom for final approval. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  3. Sponsor Ballot Schedule • Initial Ballot: 25-Feb-2010 to 25-Mar-2010 • 74 affirm, 2 negative, 5 abstention - 97% approve • First Recirculation: 28-Apr-2010 to 8-May-2010 • 78 affirm, 3 negative, 5 abstention – 96% approve • Final Recirculation: 11-May-2010 to 21-May-2010 • 79 affirm, 3 negative, 6 abstention – 96% approve • Sponsor Ballot Process Completed John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  4. Final Ballot Results • RESPONSE RATE • This ballot has met the 75% returned ballot requirement. • 99 eligible people in this ballot group. • 79 affirmative votes • 3 negative votes with comments • 0 negative votes without comments • 6 abstention votes • 88 votes received = 88% returned 6% abstention • APPROVAL RATE • The 75% affirmation requirement is being met. • 79 affirmative votes, 3 negative votes with comments • 82votes = 96% affirmative John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  5. Comment Resolution • Three negative votes with comments • All negative comments and their resolution were recirculated to the sponsor ballot group • None of the negative voters changed their votes John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  6. Comment: James Gilb • The 802.15.1-2005 standard is out of date as the Bluetooth SIG has released 3 or 4 major updates to the specification. Few, if any devices adhere only to the 1.2 version of the Bluetooth Specification (the one used for this standard). In addition, this standard only has a small portion of the Bluetooth Specification and hence, a user would ultimately need to refer to the actual Bluetooth Specification in order to build a compliant implementation. At the very least, we should have a public statement from the Bluetooth SIG that it is acceptable to certify and get a logo today for devices that are compliant only to version 1.2 of the Specification. In addition, the Bluetooth Specification may be downloaded for free, so there is no need for the 802.15.1-2005 standard. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  7. Response to James Gilb • Disagree • There are billions of devices in operation that utilize the core specifications defined by this standard. The Bluetooth SIG has released specifications incorporating the 805.15.1-2005 standard, and all of those releases are backwards compatible with 802.15.1-2005. The Bluetooth SIG specifications include higher layers of the communications stack than are specified in 802.15.1-2005. The Bluetooth SIG qualification program still includes the 1.2 version of the Bluetooth Specification. The Bluetooth Specification may only be downloaded by members of the Bluetooth SIG. While the lowest level of Bluetooth SIG membership requires no monetary fee, it does require those members to grant a royalty free license to any necessary claims required to implement a compliant portion of the Bluetooth specification. International regulatory bodies and academic researchers typically reference IEEE 802.15.1-2005 as the specification of a frequency hopping WPAN technology. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  8. Comment: Michael McGillan • The standard should be revised to support higher data rates using additional PHYs such as PSK or QPSK. Other existing POS WPAN standards support up to 3 Mbps using these technologies. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  9. Response: Michael McGillan • Out of Scope • The purpose of the reaffirmation ballot is to continue to use the existing document "as is". This comment does not point out any significant erroneous or obsolete information in the current standard. Also, in a reaffirmation, no changes can be made in the draft of the standard. We thank you for your comments. They will be recorded and may be forwarded to the WG responsible for consideration during a possible future revision. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  10. Comment: Emmanuel Monnerie • 802.15.1 is obsolete. The use of GFSK at 1Mbit/s is not practical for most applications. The performance in multipath environment is poor and this modulation is not energy efficient. For short range applications, it would be better to target higher frequency bands (cf Wireless USB or Wireless HDMI) and leave the 2.4GHz for 802.11/Wifi. Low data rate, robust and energy efficient PHY options are proposed in 802.15.4 - TG4g. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  11. Response: Emmanuel Monnerie • Out of Scope • This comment does not reference one of the existing disapprove comments from the first ballot and the draft has not been changed. In addition, there are billions of devices using GPSK at 1Mbit/s and each year a billion more are used in mobile phones, headsets, automobiles, and peripheral devices that depend on the energy efficient capabilities specified in this standard. The additional claim that 802.15.1-2005 is obsolete is not substantiated. John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

  12. Motion • Move to forward IEEE Std 802.15.1-2005 reaffirmation to RevCom. • Moved: John R. Barr • Second: • Vote: John R. Barr, JRBarr, Ltd.

More Related