1 / 16

A new Intermediate construction frameworks

Learn about SE Sub-regional Frameworks Tier 3 & Tier 2 with principles and new features. Includes the Mini Competition Process and Key Gateways for managing performance effectively.

donalddsmith
Download Presentation

A new Intermediate construction frameworks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. A new Intermediate construction frameworks Edward Currie and Mark Thomas Framework Managers

  2. Complementary frameworks for capacity • Issues with SEaLframework with interest in smaller projects (especially D&B) • Analysis showed problem most acute for projects £1m to £4m • Hence two complementary frameworks • SCF (SE) for projects > £4m • 8 contractors • ICF (Hampshire) for projects £0.5m to £4m • 10 contractors • Exactly the same operating model • Details of the new Major Works Framework @ • www.southerconstrutionframework.org.uk

  3. SE SUB REGIONAL FRAMEWORKS Tier 3 (LCF) 3 Lots (18 contractors) £1 to £1.5m Tier 2 £750k to £6.5m (11 contractors) Tier 3 £1 to £750k (11 contractors) Tier 2 (ICF) 1 Lot (10 contractors) £0.5m to £4m Tier 3 (Minor Works) Work in progress Tier 2 £750k to £5m (8 contractors) Tier 3 £50k to £750k (8 contractors) Tier 4 £1 to £50k (6 contractors)

  4. Principles – 2 stage approach Design Construction Contractor selected from framework on OHP, PC fee, construction staff cost, design & ability to meet client brief and project budget Integrated team develop designs and costs, maximise efficiency within budget whilst finalising package procurement with tier 2 and 3 Construct to agreed lump sum This framework approach has been tried and tested since HCC’s first framework in 2004 for the Nursing Care Programme

  5. Learning – Feedback from previous users • Frustration with the template approach to the Framework Tender • Complications with Preliminary pricing tied to templates • Preconstruction time based, not output based • Lack of transparency in preconstruction • No market intelligence • Contractor performance variable • Lack of enforcement of framework requirements

  6. New Framework Features • Specified Contractor duties • Framework Director • Framework Account Manager • Not to exceed rates for OHP, Preconstruction, construction and design • Faster contractor selection process • Minimum standards of contractor performance across a range of project, performance and social value KPI’s • Designed to help authorities implement key initiatives such as BIM and Project Bank Accounts through signed charters

  7. Specified • Roles • Duties • Deliverables • 10 Contractors: • Amiri, Beard, Interserve, Kier, Lakehouse, Midas • Longcross, Osborne, • Raymond Brown, Stirland What was included in The Framework Tender

  8. Opportunity pipeline published – M2i The Mini Competition Process Project details published on procurement portal (sets not to exceed price) MC 1 run through procurement portal Framework manager / project officer short list to 3 Project Officer issues and runs MC2

  9. Principles of Mini Competition 1 Confirmation of (Questions may be weighted): Preference for type of project Ability to deliver (capability) Capacity of contractor and supply chain Ability to add value Self scored responses to pre-set criteria, supported by word limited written evidence. Evaluated by framework manager, who agrees outcome with project officer.

  10. Outcome of Mini Competition 1 Preferred outcome is for three contractors to proceed to MC2. Sensitive to contractor right to appeal Sensitive to officer view on self scoring May be more than three in MC2 Framework Manager to feed back to unsuccessful contractors

  11. Principles of Mini Competition 2 Sub categories not weighted – single commercial score Cost – 30% weighting OHP % Pre construction fee% Construction fee % Design fee % If applicable and appropriate, may include Preliminary items Rates may not exceed the tender percentages from the price point, but may be less, and will be converted to lump sums based on the construction value

  12. Principles of Mini Competition 2 Technical – 70% weighting, with the following question areas: QA and performance (Continuous Improvement) Design Management & Development Supply Chain Management Handover and Aftercare Social Responsibility – Mandatory question Financial Control – Mandatory question on cost plan Framework delivery – Project delivery Programmes of Work Questions may be weighted

  13. Award and feed back • Project Officer to award • Agreed costs • Agreed programme • Pre construction agreement • Project Officer to feed back to unsuccessful contractors

  14. Key gateways

  15. Managing performance • Minimum standards of performance • Cost predictability • Time predictability • Team performance scores • Defects at handover • SME spend • Health and safety

  16. Who we are Keith Heard Senior Programme Manager Edward Currie Regional Programme Manager M. Thomas L. Howell N. Midmer C. Henderson Contact Details T: 01962 845942 E: info@southernconstructionframework.org.uk Vacancy T. Moss K Larrive Framework Team

More Related