1 / 31

Lead Line Replacement:

Lead Line Replacement:. Geoff Marke, Chief Economist Missouri Office of the Public Counsel. Accounting and other considerations from Missouri. Lead Overview.

donaldr
Download Presentation

Lead Line Replacement:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Lead Line Replacement: Geoff Marke, Chief Economist Missouri Office of the Public Counsel Accounting and other considerations from Missouri

  2. Lead Overview

  3. US National Research Council Committee on measuring lead in critical populations. (1993) Measuring lead exposure in infants, children and other sensitive populations. National Academies Press. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236466/

  4. Adapted from, Rosen et al. (2017) A discussion about the public health, lead and Legionella pneumophila in drinking water supplies in the United States. Science of the Total Environment. http:www.researchgate.net/profile/Lok_Pokhrel2/publication/313842318_A_Discussion_about_Public_Health_Lead_and_Legionella_pneumophila_in_Drinking_Water_Supplies_in_the_United_States/links/592847100f7e9b9979a35976/A-Discussion-about-Public-Health-Lead-and-Legionella-pneumophila-in-Drinking-Water-Supplies-in-the-United-States.pdf

  5. Policy Statement from the American Academy of Pediatrics. Prevention of Childhood Toxicity (2016) Pediatrics . http://pediatrics.aappublications.org/content/early/2016/06/16/peds.2016-1493

  6. CDC (2017) Recommended actions based on blood lead level: Summary of recommendations for follow-up and case management of children based on confirmed blood lead levels. https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/acclpp/actions_bills.html

  7. Triantafyllidou, S. & M. Edwards. (2011) Lead (Pb) in U.S. drinking water: school case studies, detection challenges and public health considerations. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology. http://www.yaleseas.com/watersymposium/pdfs/EdwardsLeadPaper.pdf

  8. Missouri American Water Lead Service Line Request

  9. Missouri American Water Timeline • April 28th - Notice of Rate Increase Request • May 12th- Requests an Accounting Authority Order (“AAO”) • Cost of all customer-owned lead service line replacements in 2017 • Total of 280 words informing the Commission of the “Presence of Lead Service Lines” • June 30th- $369 (non-ISRS $84) million rate increase request or 25.4% overall increase over revenues from last general rate case (WR-2015-0301) • Specific district requests vary: St. Louis County = 45.5 to 48.4% increase • Single-Tariff, AMI, Cloud Computing, Decoupling, ISRS, Future Test Year and 10.8 ROE • August 1st - Direct Testimony filed for AAO • September 27th - One-Day Hearing over AAO

  10. Missouri American Water Position • Sought Commission approval of a regulatory asset • That is, “probable recovery” or “an implicit promise of recovery” outside of a rate case • Estimated 30,000 lead service lines at a cost between $3,000 to $5,000 per unit over a ten-year period.

  11. Public Counsel Position • Reject the AAO request – no regulatory asset only deferred debit—must follow GAAP because it is outside of a rate case. • Pursue, in the pending rate case, A two-year, $ 8 million pilot study to explore the feasibility, legality and associated policy implications of full lead service line replacement across MAWC and the state of Missouri. • Study Includes: • 1.) Advisory Committee • 2.) Scoping Analysis • 3.) Testing and Planned Lead Service Line Replacement • 4.) Communications, Disclosure, and Implementation Considerations • 5.) Ancillary Considerations

  12. Accounting Considerations • Withdraw AAO request and be given cost treatment within MAWC’s pending rate case. • Defer construction and administrative costs of the pilot program to NARUC Class A USOA Account 186 Miscellaneous Deferred Debits;

  13. Financing costs charged to Account 186 at current short term debt rate; • Amortize over an accelerated period of 10 years with no rate base treatment of the deferred program cost; • Outside funding will be used to offset the Account 186 balance.

  14. Estimated Costs • 2017 realized cost per service line replacement = $10,000 per unit • Company modified estimate to $6,000 per unit moving forward • Current Authorized Rate Base - $1,132,843,000

  15. Estimated Lead Service Lines Cornwell, D.A. et al (2016) National Survey of Lead Service Line Occurrence. Journal of American Water Works Association. http://media.mlive.com/news_impact/other/jaw201604cornwell_pr.pdf

  16. How confident are we with the estimate? Wisely, J. and T. Spangler (2016) Where are the lead pipes? In many cities, we just don’t know. http://www.freep.com/story/news/local/michigan/flint-water-crisis/2016/02/27/lead-water-lines-lurk-unknown-many-cities/80551724/

  17. What about Flint? Drum, K. (2016) Raw data: lead poisoning of kids in Flint, Mother Jones. http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/01/raw-data-lead-poisioning-kids-flint/ website contains work papers for results.

  18. Pilot mirrors Best Practice Literature Lead Service Line Replacement Collaborative (2017) Roadmap: Plan Development http://www.lslr-collaborative.org/plan-development.html

  19. Cost Allocation

  20. Customer Specific Pricing

  21. Inter-Class Considerations

  22. District Specific Pricing

  23. Zonal Pricing

  24. Single Tariff

  25. Cost Causation?

  26. Single State

  27. WR-2017-0285 Rate Case

  28. Impact on Future Acquisitions

  29. Douglass, E. (2017) Towns sell their public water systems—and come to regret it. The Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/towns-sell-their-public-water-systems--and-come-to-regret-it/2017/07/07/6ec5b8d6-4bc6-11e7-bc1b-fddbd8359dee_story.html?utm_term=.1e848903ee5d

  30. St. Louis?

  31. Questions? • Geoff Marke, Chief Economist • Missouri Office of the Public Counsel • Geoff.marke@ded.mo.gov

More Related