200 likes | 468 Views
IntegrityHistoryDisclosure. Overview. . Defining Integrity. Current Perspective. Integrity in Research IndividualIntellectual honestyObjectivity Personal responsibilityTransparency in conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interestInstitutionalPromote responsible conduct and foster
E N D
1. Conflicts of Interest and Disclosure A Critical Assessment of the Current COI Policyand the Value of IntegritySusan S. Night, JD, LLMhealth Policy and Ethics FellowBaylor College of MedicineHouston, Texas Office of Research Integrity
2009 Research Conference on Research Integrity
2. Integrity
History
Disclosure Overview
3. Defining Integrity
4. Current Perspective Integrity in Research
Individual
Intellectual honesty
Objectivity
Personal responsibility
Transparency in conflicts of interest or potential conflicts of interest
Institutional
Promote responsible conduct and foster integrity
Anticipate, reveal and manage individual and institutional conflicts of interest
5. Revised Perspective
6. Conflicts of Interest
7. Is it possible to promote and even accelerate the progress of research while maintaining public trust in research by having a balance in, but not eliminating industry-academia relationships?
8. What is a COI? A conflict of interest may occur when a
clinician, researcher, public official, IRB member, university official, author, reviewer, editor
allows a secondary interest
financial gain, publication opportunity, career advancement, outside employment, personal considerations, relationships, investments, gifts
to interfere with a primary interest
patient welfare, research validity, publication of research, obligation to act in the best interest of another
9. History of Conflicts of Interest
10. History Foundations are primary funding source for research
Federal funding = threat to scientific freedom
Employment by industry
“domination by government” vs. “domination by industry” Research on behalf of the country-partnership with industry
Beginning of federal funding for research
Merton’s objectivity
COI - meetings Prior to 1940 1940s
11. History Industry sponsors retain publication rights and restrictions
COI related to federal employees Academia and industry address drug safety
COI related to defense of public interest
Federal funding now 60%
AAUP report on COI 1950s 1960s
12. History Mandates on disclosing COIs – McCarthyism?
Disclosure more than required by federal statute
COIs – environmental and occupational exposure Bayh-Dole
Pajaro Dunes – COIs managed according to “special circumstances and traditions” 1970s 1980s
13. History NIH policy on COI withdrawn
AAMC, AAU, AAHC reports on COI 8 reports on guidelines and/or recommendations for COI 1990s 2000s
14. This page intentionally left blank
15. Disclosure
16. Goal of Disclosure Objectivity in research – reduce bias
Prevent harm
Increase public trust
17. Impact of Disclosure Advantages
Consistent with policy approaches in other areas
Stock analysts
Sarbanes-Oxley
McCain-Finegold
Can help management govern better
Consistent with principle of autonomy
Reduces the need for other remedies e.g. regulation
18. Impact of Disclosure Disadvantages
Shift responsibility away from one who discloses – caveat emptor
Does not achieve goal of Objectivity/Elimination of Bias
Implicit and unconscious bias
Banaji and Loewenstein
www.tolerance.org/hidden_bias
Does not meet the criteria for Integrity
Discernment = NO
Act = yes
Speak = yes
19. Disclosure in the Real World Individual researcher disclosure
“In order to manage this conflict of interest, the Committee requires that you keep your consulting fees from XXX to an amount equal to or less than $10,000 on an annual basis….In doing so, you will eliminate your conflict of interest as defined by….policies and PHS regulations.
Institutional Conflict of Interest
Virginia Commonwealth University
Master Service agreement with Philip Morris
20. Final Thoughts History tells the story of collaboration
Honesty and objectivity = disclosure
Integrity = encourages exploration of unconscious bias
What would Cicero say?
There are 3 questions when considering a course of action
What is honorable?
What is useful?
What is apparently useful conflicts with what is right
“for when the useful seems to pull them forward towards itself and rectitude seems to draw them back in its direction, the mind as it reflects is tugged in opposite directions, and this makes for troubled indecision”