1 / 28

WP2 -Standardization and Interoperability

WP2 -Standardization and Interoperability. Christoph Waldmann MARUM, Bremen waldmann@marum.de. Participants: UniAbdn, IFREMER, INFN, UPC, dBScale, SEND OFFSHORE Kiel University All Regions Workshop, Paris, Oct 5-7,09. OUTLINE. Rationale for Standardization

dong
Download Presentation

WP2 -Standardization and Interoperability

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. WP2 -Standardization and Interoperability Christoph Waldmann MARUM, Bremen waldmann@marum.de Participants: UniAbdn, IFREMER, INFN, UPC, dBScale, SEND OFFSHORE Kiel University All Regions Workshop, Paris, Oct 5-7,09

  2. OUTLINE • Rationale for Standardization • Scope of the workpackage on standardization • Implementation of tasks

  3. RATIONALE • Why Standardization? • It is essential for • System building • Sharing infrastructures and platforms • Integrating different systems • Enabling the transition from experimental to operational phase • Concerns • Will it constraint the versatility/flexibility? • Will the integration be easier or more complex?

  4. BACKGROUND Differences Operational versus Research (Parisot, OceanObs09)

  5. RATIONALE • Visions • Instruments can be freely interchanged between observatories worldwide • Instruments are calibrated according to agreed upon standard procedures • Data quality can be checked and specified • Data are described with a standard format and vocabulary • Deployment, maintenance and service can be carried out by different groups

  6. BACKGROUND • Visions have to be broken down into tasks • How efficient does it have to be? • How broad is the range of applicability? • What is the present capability?

  7. BACKGROUND CONSTRAINTS The existing systems are an eclectic mix of what individuals and groups have brought to the table. Unlikely to change. As technology constantly changes, operators of observatory systems must be prepared to re-evaluate constantly Wunsch OceanObs09

  8. BACKGROUND Addressing different Levels and domains Data interoperability Data quality Standardization Service/Maintenance Intervention

  9. Workpackage 2- Tasks Sensors and Scientific packages Quality assurance / quality control Underwater intervention Sharing testing facilities Contribution to GEOSS standardization and implementation activities Organization of the second Best Practices Workshop Organization of equipment tests on cabled sites

  10. IMPLEMENTATION Forming task teams on standards Review and test existing standards Set up links to international initiatives Active involvement in GEOSS activities

  11. registration Archiving, curation & control dissemination sensor controls manual sensors and/or related facilites Sensor Registry(Sensor ML) Plug‘n’Work sensor COMUNITIES automated ESONET PortalData & Services Feature Catalogue(ISO 19110) Instrument specifications Sensor registry

  12. IEEE1451 TIM IEEE1451 TIM Sensor + A/D + TEDS Sensor + A/D + TEDS OGC UsersData presentation and application layer Ocean Observatory Owners UDDI (WSDL) GEOSS SWE Services and Catalog Sensor Registry SHORESIDE Ocean instruments and dataontologies SensorML O&M SensorML O&M SensorML SensorML SensorML SensorML SensorML SensorML Internet IEEE 1451 Network Capable Processor Encapsulation- Web Services UW-Node 02/09/2014 12 OCEAN

  13. OGC InteroperabilityExperiment Based on Web services

  14. STANDARD EVALUATION PUBLICATION • Evaluation of MBARI PUCK protocol for interoperable ocean observatories Joaquin del Rio1, Tom O'Reilly2, Kent Headley2, Duane Edgington2, Dan Toma1, Jesper Zedlitz7, Frank Johnson3, Greg Johnson3, Eric Davis4, Klaus Schleisiek5, Neil Cater4, Reo Phillips6, Eric Delory8, Christoph Waldman9 1SARTI, Technical University of Catalonia, Joaquin.del.rio@upc.edu, 2MBARI, oreilly@mbari.org, 3RBR, 4Fisheries and Marine Institute of Memorial University of Newfoundland, 5SEND, 6AXYS, 7Kiel University, 8dBScale, 9MARUM University

  15. QUALITY PLAN Come up with a framework document for all standard related documentation 1. Subcontractor/Manufacturer Equipment 2. Design and Technology Reviews 3. Reliability Engineering 4. High Level Test Plan 5. Risk Analysis 6. Documentation Control 7. Data flagging model

  16. UNDERWATER INTERVENTION • Review of common or shared procedures • Review offshore standard evaluation and define a recommendation for marine science observatory intervention • Design recommendations for training, simulation and testing • Underwater intervention on scientific permanent observatories – Draft document in progress • Standards and recommended practices for underwater intervention and structures interfaces in the Offshore industry

  17. SHARING TESTING FACILITIES • To organise the sharing of sea going equipments and testing facilities • To launch common practices • To set up a data base of land based testing facilities and promote the shared use of them • To promote the constitution of teams on specific subjects for sharing technical and methodological expertise in view of developing common practices

  18. Contribution to GEOSS standardisation and implementationactivities • Registries • Services • Standards • Best Practices • Requirements WebPortal Clearinghouse GEOSS Common Infrastructure

  19. Contribution to GEOSS standardisation and implementationactivities • Contributing with data and concepts • Use of GEO progress in regard to standardization and interoperability aspects • Participation in GEOSS workshops and contribution to working groups created by GEOSS supporting organizations • Dissemination of GEOSS concepts within ESONET and other workshops

  20. Contribution to GEOSS standardisation and implementationactivities http://sites.google.com/site/esonetgeoss/Home

  21. DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES Session on EGU General Assembly, April 2010 Towards establishing permanent infrastructures for ocean observations: instrumentation, measurement strategies and methods for ocean observatories Convener: C. Waldmann, MARUM Co-Conveners: I. Puillat-Felix, IFREMER L. Beranzoli, INGV R. Stephen, WHOI

  22. DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES MARTECH Workshop Nov 09, Barcelona Demonstration of smart sensor concepts

  23. DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES GEOSS Workshop XXVII Understanding the Integrated Ocean Observation Systems, including Sub-surface Sensors

  24. DISSEMINATION ACTIVITIES GEOSS Workshop XXVII - Conclusions • GEO should help with the formulation of an ocean community of practice • GEO should support intergovernmental formalization of interoperability and coordination of an operational mission for ocean observations. This could include coordinated funding • GEO support is requested for Identification and coordination of societal benefits from ocean data.

  25. 2nd BEST PRACTICES WORKSHOP Main Workshop Themes • Generic Instrumentation Biochemical and acoustic sensors • Infrastructure Stand- alone and cabled observatories • Standardisation and Interoperability Data processing, smart sensors, and underwater intervention

  26. Organization of equipment tests on cabled sites with training activities Tests of observatory equipments will be organised to teach and demonstrate the use of equipments dedicated to long term immersion for real time measurements to demonstrate the procedures of measurements, underwater interventions etc Equipment tests on cabled sites

  27. Establish an international standard implementation committee for ocean observatories? Food for thoughts

  28. Anne Holford, Aberdeen University IFREMER Yves Auffret, Jean- Francois Drogou, Jerome Blandin, Jean Marvaldi Antoni Manuel, Joaquin Del Rio, UPC Eric Delory, dbScale Klaus Schleisiek, SEND Offshore Jesper Zedlitz, Kiel University Mario Musumeci, INFN Robert Huber, Uwe Schindler, Christoph Waldmann, MARUM Tom O’Reilly, MBARI, USA Standardization Group

More Related