1 / 6

Consultation on future monitoring of aid effectiveness in health

This meeting will review the strengths and weaknesses of the current monitoring approach used by IHP+ in relation to indicators, process, and the use of findings to change behavior. It will also strategize on options for future monitoring processes for IHP+ signatories. The meeting aims to strengthen accountability mechanisms and promote greater mutual accountability in health aid effectiveness.

dorab
Download Presentation

Consultation on future monitoring of aid effectiveness in health

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Consultation on future monitoring of aid effectiveness in health Meeting of IHP+ working group on mutual accountability

  2. Meeting background • IHP+ signatories to Global Compact commit to be held to account, by an independent monitoring mechanism • IHP+Results consortium contracted to do three rounds of monitoring. • Their approach has evolved, in consultation with IHP+ Mutual Accountability Working Group. • 2nd and 3rd rounds based on adapted Paris indicators. Are strengths and weaknesses of the approach used – related to indicators, process and use of findings to change behaviour. • Was agreed that after 3 rounds, the approach would be reviewed • Recent wider developments • Post Busan Partnership for Effective Development Co-operation & its monitoring process; interest in innovative sector specific approaches • More attention to strengthening domestic accountability mechanisms (eg COIA); shift from global monitoring processes, if not from global reports (eg iERG approach) • Continued economic crisis and increased focus on results • Latest finding of progress but lack of 'step change' in health aid effectiveness

  3. Meeting objectives • To review lessons learned on monitoring aid effectiveness and results / strengthening accountability mechanisms (morning) • To strategize on options for any future monitoring processes for IHP+ signatories (afternoon)

  4. Meeting outcome and next steps • Some useful and practical ideas on options for future monitoring approach, that can be presented for consideration to IHP+ signatories. • During October / November: A closed IHP+ partners electronic discussion forum on options • Feedback will be summarised and final proposal presented for decision at a special session in the IHP+ 4th Country Teams Meeting in Nairobi in December

  5. Spares / later info

  6. Country compacts and joint annual reviews as tools for greater mutual accountability • 55% of country signatories of Global Compact have national compacts/MOUs (17/31). 6 more in preparation • 70% signed by key development partners and 53% signed by CSOs too (significant difference "old" and "new" compacts) • 76% of compacts have indicators for tracking progress (but only 21% have baselines) • Before mid-2010: 60%/15% • After mid-2010: 100%/29% • All recent compacts bar one contain indicators equivalent to those monitored by IHP+Results • 16/31 countries known to have joint annual reviews. Inclusion of review of compact / MOU commitments in JARs – little information.

More Related