1 / 10

Making Progress

Making Progress. A Review of progress against Aberdeenshire Alcohol & Drug Partnership’s Strategy. Why Review Progress?. 18 months into 3 year Strategy Range of issues emerged since publication Concerns expressed about progress of ADP’s (e.g. ORT report). Multi-perspective Review.

dore
Download Presentation

Making Progress

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Making Progress A Review of progress against Aberdeenshire Alcohol & Drug Partnership’s Strategy

  2. Why Review Progress? • 18 months into 3 year Strategy • Range of issues emerged since publication • Concerns expressed about progress of ADP’s (e.g. ORT report)

  3. Multi-perspective Review • Evaluation against baseline outcome indicators • Review of ADP Delivery Plan • Tactical Group and Forum Chair interviews • ADP member/stakeholder priorities survey • Views of National Support Officers

  4. Findings • Positive disposition across all partners to want to make a difference and do well • Strategy well regarded and most partners working towards it • Evidence of progress across many quarters (e.g. HEAT) • Recognition of challenges and willingness to tackle

  5. Findings Issues emerged across a range of themes: • Intelligence & finance • Governance & ADP Partnership Agreement • Agreeing priorities for next 12 months • Integration and service redesign

  6. Intelligence & Finance (p13) • We can’t readily account for our performance, especially progress with recovery • Service monitoring considered weak • Lack of financial transparency • Different views on shifting the balance of spend

  7. Governance (p13/14) • Partnership working tensions • Weak collective holding to account • Uncertainty about who the ADP should be accountable to • Variable ownership of the delivery plan

  8. Priorities for Coming Year (p15/16) • Currently too many priorities • Survey findings generally consistent with Chairs’ views • SG #1 priority = demonstrating recovery outcomes for each Service User

  9. Integration & Service Redesign (p15) • Redesign stalled • Competing visions for change • Reluctance to a collective workforce development agenda • Gross imbalance between drugs and alcohol services

  10. Workshop Format • Split into 4 groups • Facilitated discussion on each theme (20mins) • Findings summarised as rhetorical questions • Select the most important to discuss • Seek consensus on actions necessary • Facilitators will collate and write up findings

More Related