510 likes | 1.09k Views
Clinical Trials in Ophthalmology. Mohamed Soliman PGY-2 Ophthalmology LSUHSC Shreveport. Diabetic Retinopathy. ET DRS Early treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study. Study Questions Effectiveness of Photocoagulation DR and DME Effectiveness of Asprin in preventing progresion of DR
E N D
Clinical Trials in Ophthalmology Mohamed Soliman PGY-2 Ophthalmology LSUHSC Shreveport
ET DRSEarly treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Study Questions • Effectiveness of Photocoagulation DR and DME • Effectiveness of Asprin in preventing progresion of DR Outcome Variables • SVL (Severe Visual Loss) : VA < 5/200 for at least 4 months • MVL (Moderate Visual Loss) : Doubling of Visual angle • Progression of DR
ET DRSEarly treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Results for Early Scatter Photocoagulation • Did not reduce the risk of SVL • Not indicated in Mild / Moderate NPDR • More effective for Type 2 DM Mild NPDR Moderate NPDR Early PDR
ET DRSEarly treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Defined CSME as : • Retinal edema within 500 µm of center of macula • HE within 500 µm of center of macula if associated with thickening of adjacent retina • A zone of thickening larger than 1 DD if located within 1 DD of the center of the macula
ET DRSEarly treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Results for focal photocoagulation for DME • Decreased risk of MVL • Increased chance of visual gain (halving of Visual angle) • Decreased retinal thickening
ET DRSEarly treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Results for Asprin • Did not alter progression of DR • Did not affect VA • Did not increase Vitreous Hemorrhage • Did decrease the risk of Cardiovascular Morbidity and mortality
DRSDiabetic Retinopathy Study Study Question • Is Photocoagulation (argon or xenon arc) effective in treating DR Eligibilty • PDR or Severe NPDR Outcome variables • SVL ( VA < 5/200 )
DRSDiabetic Retinopathy Study Results • Photocoagulation decreased the risk of SVL • Greatest benefit to High Risk PDR Recommended prompt treatment of“High Risk PDR” • Mild NVD + Vitreous Hemorrhage • Moderate NVE + Vitreous Hemorrhage • Mod/Severe NVD (1/4 – 1/3 NVD) with or without Vitreous Hemorrhage High Risk PDR 3 months after laser
DCCTDiabetes Control and Complications Trial Study question • Will intensive control of Blood sugar (BS) in Type 1 DM slow the development of DR or slow its progression Results Intensive control of BS • Decreased risk of developing DR (76%) • Slowed progression of DR (54%) • Decreased risk of Neuropathy (60%) Albuminuria (54%) But … • Early worsening of DR in 1st year • Increased risk of Hypoglycemic events
UKPDSUnited Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study Study Questions • Will intensive control of Blood Sugar (BS) in Type 2 DM decrease the microvascular complications of Diabetes • Will intensive control of Blood Pressure (BP) in Type 2 DM decrease the microvascular complications of Diabetes (including DR progression) Results • Intensive control of BS slowed the progression of DR and decreased the risk of micro vascular complications • Intensive control of BP slowed the micro and macrovacular complications of DM
DVSDiabetic Vitrectomy Study Objective • Natural course and effect of surgical intervention on severe PDR Results • Type 1 DM with Dense Vitreous Hemorrhage (VH) and SVL in 1 eye : Early Surgery (1-6 m after visual loss) • Type 2 DM with dense VH: No difference between early and late vitrectomy Note: Endolaser was not yet available during this study 1988 and microsurgical techniques have greatly improved so outcomes in PPV may be better than those reported in the DVS
AREDSAge-Related Eye Disease Study Objective • To evaluate whether antioxidants or zinc supplements can reduce development or progression of AMD Results • Patients with intermediate, dry AMD, or unilateral advanced AMD benefited from antioxidants and zinc supplementation with respect to vision loss and progression of AMD
MPSMacular Photocoagulation Study Objective • Does laser treatment to leaking CNVs prevent significant visual loss compared to observation Study design • Photocoagulation of Extrafoveal, juxtfoveal and subfoveal leaking CNVs Outcome variables • Severe Visual loss (SVL) = loss of 6 or more lines, or quadrupling of the visual angle
MPSMacular Photocoagulation Study Results • Laser decreased the risk of SVL in eyes with Extrafoveal and JuxtafovealCNV (AMD,POHS and idopathic)compared to no treatment • InSubfovealCNVs there was an initial drop in VA but after 1 year resulted in a decrease in SVL compared to observed eyes. Persistent or recurrent CNV was noted in 51% of lasered eyes in 24 months
TAPTreatment of AMD with PDT study Objective • To determine if PDT with verteporfin can reduce visual loss in patients with subfoveal CNV Results • Patients treated with PDT+Verteporfin sustained less MVL. This was mainly in seen in predominantly classic CNV (>50% of area is classic).
VIPVerteporfin in PDT Trial (AMD and Myopia) Objective • To determine if PDT + Verteporfin can reduce visual loss in Patients with subfoveal CNV Results • Decreased MVL and SVL • Note : PDT use has dropped significantly with the advent of pharmacotherapy, it may be used in combination with antiangiogenisis treatments.
VISIONVEGF inhibition Study in Ocular Neovascularization Objective • To determine if pegaptanib (Macugen) can reduce the risk of visual loss in subfoveal CNVs Results • 70% of patients lost < 3 lines • 6% showed visual gain • Endophthalmitis after injection (1.3 risk/patient/year) • Note: Use of this drug has dropped as newer antiangiogenesis agents have been developed
ANCHORAnti-VEGF for the tretment of Predominantly Classic CNV in AMD Objective • To determine if monthly intravitrealRanibizumab (Lucentis) can reduce visual loss in patients with predominantly classic CNV 2ry to wet AMD Study design • Patients were given Lucentis every month for 24 months and compared to PDT with verteporfin Results • 95% of patients given Lucentis maintained or improved their vision after 12 months • 64% treated with PDT+ Verteporfin over 12 months
MARINAMinimally classic/Occult Trial of Ranibizumab in Neovascular AMD Objective • To determine if monthly Ranibizumab (Lucentis) can reduce visual loss in Patients with occult Subfoveal CNV 2ry to wet AMD . Study design • Patients were given Lucentis every 4 weeks for 24 months and compared to placebo Results • 95% of patients experienced visual improvement or stabilization after 12 months
EVSEndophthalmitisVitrectomy Study Objective • Evaluate the role of PPV and Intravenous antibiotics in post-operativebacterialendophthalmitis Participants • Patients with bacterial endophthalmitis within 6 weeks of onset of infection Study design • Patients randomized to systemic antibiotics or not, and to immediate PPV or to immediate tap/inject
EVSEndophthalmitisVitrectomy Study Results • Systemic Antibiotics not effective : No difference in VA whether or not systemic antibiotics (Amikacin/Ceftazidime) were employed • Tap/inject for better than LP vision : No difference in outcomes between PPV and tap/inject group for VA better than LP • Immediate PPV for LP vision: showed much better results Note : Revolutionized treatment of post-cataract surgery endophthalmitis making it an office procedure of tap and inject for most eyes
CVOSCentral Vein Occlusion Study Objective • To determine if grid laser improve VA with CRVO and perfused ME. • To determine if early PRP prevents NVI/NVA Results • Grid laser treatment in the macula reduced FA evidence of macular edema, yet yielded no benefit in VA • (might be beneficial in younger patients with macular edema)
Most important risk factor for NVI is poor VA and larger areas of retinal capillary nonperfusion • PRP should be done after 2 clock hours of NVI • Prophylactic PRP does not decrease the incidence of NVI • (not done in clinical practice)
BVOSBranch Vein Occlusion Study • Objective • Can focal macular laser improve VA in BRVOs with ME and VA ≤ 20/40. • Can scatter laser prevent NV and VH in BRVOs. • Results • Improved VA after laser for ME with intact foveal vasculature and VA ≤ 20/40
BVOSBranch Vein Occlusion Study • Results • PRP to the area of nonperfusioncaused regression of new vessels with retinal or disc neovascularization • Ischemia alone is not an indication for scatter laser • Patients should be observed for the development of neovascularization • Scatter laser reduced the risk of VH in eyes with recent BRVO that developed neovascularization
STOP-ROPSupplemental Therapeutic Oxygen for Prethreshold ROP Objective • To test whether supplemental oxygen would decrease the progression from prethreshold to threshold disease. Results • Supplemental oxygen did not cause further progression of prethershold ROP but also did not reduce the number of infants requiring ablative therapy • Oxygen increased the risk of adverse pulmonary events
CROPTrial of Cryotherapy for ROP Objective • To determine if Cryotherapy to the peripheral avascular retina in severe ROP prevented cicatricial changes and RD. Results • Cryotherapy to the avascular anterior retina in ROP eyes with thershold disease showed a reduction by half in unfavourable outcomes at 1 year • Threshold disease • Zone 1 or Zone 2 • Stage 3 (5 contiguous or 8 total clock hours) • With plus disease • At 10 years eyes that received Cryotherapy were still much less than control eyes to be blind
ET-ROPEarly Treatment for Retinopathy of Prematurity Study • Determined that earlier laser therapy can improve visual and anatomic outcomes in ROP • Recommended laser therapy for • Type 1 Prethreshold disease • Zone 1 with plus disease • Zone 1 with stage 3 • Zone 2 , stage 2/3 with plus Disease • Implied treating an additional 50% more patients than with CROP guidlines
HEDSHerpetic Eye Disease Study Objective: • To evaluate the efficacy of topical steroids and oral acyclovir in treating HSV stromalkeratitis and iridocyclitisin conjunction with topical trifluridine (Viroptic). Results • Do topical steroids treat stromalkeratitis? Yes. They treat stromal inflammation and shorten the duration of keratitis
HEDSHerpetic Eye Disease Study Question and Answer Is oral acyclovir helpful in: • A) treating stromalkeratitis (in addition to trifluridine and steriods)…………….. No • B)treating HSV iritis ……………………………….…..Not sure. Probably • C)prevent development of Stromalkeratitis and iritis in patients with epithelial keratitis…….… No • D)prophylaxis against HSV recurrences……………...Yes
COMSCollaborative Ocular Melanoma Study COMS large Choroidal Melanoma trial • Large Apex > 10 Base >16 • Compared Enucleation alone to Enucleationpreceeded by External beam RT Results • Established appropriateness of primary enucleation alone (RT did not improve overall survival)
COMSCollaborative Ocular Melanoma Study COMS Medium ChoroidalMelanoma trial • Medium Apex <10Base <16 • Compared Standardized enucleation and brachytherapy (iodine 125) • Results
COMSCollaborative Ocular Melanoma Study COMS Small ChoroidalMelanoma trial • Small Apex 1-2.4 Base 4-8 • Observational study for small tumors • Melanoma specific mortality 1 % at 5 y Clinical Risk factors: -Greater initial thinckness -presence of orange pigment -absence of Drusen &/or RPE changes