1 / 13

Payment By Results – A partnership perspective

Payment By Results – A partnership perspective. Nic Adamson DAAT Partnership Manager. Introduction. This outlines Worcestershire’s approach to procuring an outcome focused treatment system.

doris
Download Presentation

Payment By Results – A partnership perspective

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Payment By Results –A partnership perspective Nic Adamson DAAT Partnership Manager

  2. Introduction • This outlines Worcestershire’s approach to procuring an outcome focused treatment system. • It incorporates payment by results. The process was supported by RichardTamlyn from the Centre for Public Innovation.

  3. Context • The service had never been subject to procurement • The system had several components, none of which worked effectively together • The system was very blocked, the Willy Wonka factory of treatment. • Planned discharges are low • Lack of emphasis upon PSI • System not resilient to change

  4. The vision • An integrated drug and alcohol service • Recovery orientated model • For adults and young people • Outcome focused delivery • Focused on positive and sustainable behavioural change • Main outcome, sustained recovery • Including payment by results

  5. Procurement exercise • Describe the key outcomes your service will achieve • Outline the key performance targets you will use to achieve these outcomes • Tell us how many people will engage with your service each year, and of these, how many will achieve proposed performance targets

  6. Year oneAllocating the costs • Total budget = 4million • For year one 25% by results • For year two 30% by results • For year three 40% by results • Calculations made to divide the outcomes across domains, looking at activity and intensity. • Critical to get it right!

  7. MILESTONE MANAGEMENT What are milestones and how do they help?

  8. Recovery plan agreed & identified 1819 Demonstrate improvement against TOPs, (reduction in days of use, criminal activity and improvement in life quality 1364 1023 Achieve identified goals 329 Achieve drug free/occasional use Payment point: £1236.50 per outcome, up to a maximum payment of £327,672.50 Sustain substance free for 4 weeks & planned discharge 265 Tier 3, Adult Drugs Funnel Evidence: Halo, Case file Audit, TOP's data, skills consortium requirements Milestone 1 Milestone 2 Milestone 3 Milestone 4 Milestone 5 Performance Target: 265 people will achieve 4 weeks drug free and be planned discharged

  9. Domains of outcomes • Young people – tier 2 and 3 funnels • Adult drugs – tier 2 funnel, tier 3 PSI and a prescribing funnel and needle exchange funnel • Adult alcohol – tier 2 and tier 3 funnels • Family services funnel

  10. How will payment be managed?

  11. What were the key considerations? • Payment by results – year one is a test year, clear that future years will vary • Lot of work to spread the risk across domains • Ensure that outcomes are not process driven • Ensuring outcomes are internally driven, rather than affected by extraneous factors such as housing availability • Ensuring accuracy of base line data and achievability of outcomes • Ensuring all parties are clear on what is required • Involving all staff

  12. What do we hope to acheive? • Focused service delivery • Shift to outcome focused commissioning • Shift to partnership commissioning • Value for money • A focus on behavioural change rather than treatment processes • Service issues highlighted early • Positive outcomes for service users • Transparency between provider and commissioner, supporting audit process • A service based on hope and strengths rather than problems and weaknesses

  13. Lessons learned? • Still learning • Shared risk • Wait till year two to introduce fully • Allow for transformational change • Make sure outcomes are fair

More Related