190 likes | 368 Views
INFN Bari N. Colonna G. Tagliente INFN Trieste K. Fujii P.M. Milazzo C. Moreau ITN Lisboa L.Marques P.Vaz. R. in Paris. Zirconium capture measurements: data analysis results, perspectives.
E N D
INFN Bari N. Colonna G. Tagliente INFN Trieste K. Fujii P.M. Milazzo C. Moreau ITN Lisboa L.Marques P.Vaz R in Paris Zirconium capture measurements: data analysis results, perspectives
Physics cases-process analysis of great interest in stellar modeling (e.g. evolution of Red Giant stars)nuclear reactor design purpose nuclear waste transmutation 90 neutron magic number (N=50) Act as a bottle neck for the reaction flow towards heavier elements 90, 91, 92, 93, 94 Low-neutron capture cross sections, predominantly of s-process origin (existing data have uncertainties larger than 10%) 93 radioactive isotope One of the major long-lived fission products (T½ = 1.5 Myr) Used in reactor’s structural materials 96 r-process only Relevant in the study of pulsing AGB stars
Physics case, Nuclear Astrophysics (n,g) x-sections of Zr Bottleneck in the s-process flow at N=50 neutron magic number Small x-sections Normalization of s-process abundance Probing the neutron exposure and neutron flux in Red Giant Stars TOF 08
Zr capture Yields Zr Yield Overall background Stable isotopes, 2003 93Zr 93Zr Natural radioactivity of the sample
Resonance analysis 2 4 3 1 3 4 1 2 Zr-92 data Resonance Fit Normalization 197Au 4.9eV N.F.(92Zr)=0.6219 SAMMY fit of 92Zr Estimated resonance parameters E, Γg, Γn
Resonance analysistypical examples 94Zr En=58.7keV 90 91 96 94 … multiple scattering correction, Doppler broadening and instrumental resolution were included in the analysis
Data analysis Sntof14%lower than the previous data Gnntof7%lower than the previous data
Data analysis Sntof19%lower than the previous data Gnntof3%lower than the previous data
Data analysis Sntof14%lower than the previous data Gnntof1%lower than the previous data
Data analysis Sntof4%higher than the previous data Gnntof3%higher than the previous data
Data analysis Sntof25%lower than the previous data Gnntof12%lower than the previous data
Data analysis Mughabghab 2006 Mughabghab 1986
Data analysisopen questions 96Zr Analysis
Data analysisopen questions 91 on 91 sample 91 on 96 sample En = 893.3 eV ΔS/S ~ 1% En = 681.7 eV ΔS/S ~ 13% not related to wrong sample components definition
(almost) ready to publish how to proceed? • A paper for each isotope (because of the difference in Gg) • Two papers of the Astrophysics implication of all stable isotopes