1 / 4

Energy & Military Effectiveness:

Energy & Military Effectiveness: Changing How Energy is Considered in DoD Planning and Acquisition. David Bak SAIC supporting OUSD(AT&L)/Energy MORS P&E Special Meeting 30 Nov 2009. What’s Changed Since Last Year.

dougal
Download Presentation

Energy & Military Effectiveness:

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Energy & Military Effectiveness: Changing How Energy is Considered in DoD Planning and Acquisition David Bak SAIC supporting OUSD(AT&L)/Energy MORS P&E Special Meeting 30 Nov 2009

  2. What’s Changed Since Last Year • OSD(AT&L) issued guidance and tools for calculating the Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel in all acquisition program AoAs • https://acc.dau.mil/GetAttachment.aspx?id=285803&pname=file&aid=43783&lang=en-US • https://acc.dau.mil/CommunityBrowser.aspx?id=318097&lang=en-US • Navy and Marine Corps leadership have publicly committed to making systemic changes in operational energy • FBCF and Total Ownership Cost in ALL acquisition programs and procurements • Global 09 Navy wargame challenged old assumptions on operational energy vulnerabilities to US forces • OSD(AT&L), JS J4 and Navy Energy Coordination Office collaborating on two case studies to vet Energy Efficiency KPP and FBCF use • OSD Policy committed to including energy logistics risks in Defense Planning Scenarios for first time – can’t just assume fuel will get there • NATO Research & Technology Organization exploratory team on Energy Analysis

  3. DoD Energy - Root Cause Analysis • How rigorously have we assessed DoD’s energy problems? • How did those problems come about? • Where were the choices made that created them? Have we looked across stove-pipes as well as down them? • What assumptions, analysis or decisions should be revisited to guide our energy plans? • Through what process should we decide where to spend our marginal dollar on energy improvements? • How should energy investments compete with other issues for resources? How important is energy to core business? • How do we best reconcile improving capability, reducing costs and meeting mandates in energy? Moving from point solutions to analytically-informed prioritization & resourcing

  4. Where Energy Really Needs to Play Differently • Build fuel delivery, protection and vulnerability risk into Service & Joint campaign models, wargames, Defense Planning Scenarios (DPS’) and force planning builds (MSFDs) • Examine RED threats to “tail” much more realistically Service & Joint Force Planning • Realistically constrain operational fuel demand requirements to improve endurance, flexibility, mobility and supportability • Develop the Energy KPP methodology for all “materiel solutions” JCIDS • Use the planning scenarios to set programs’/platforms’ fuel demand objective and threshold metrics • Require SAEs-PEOs-PMs to apply the Fully Burdened Cost of Fuel (FBCF) to TOC estimates to better inform tradespace decisions • Incentivize better relationship btw the PMs, analysts, and loggies Acquisition Slow, steady progress so far – proof will be in RFPs

More Related