300 likes | 321 Views
Chapter 5. Normalization An Normalization example. Learning Objectives. What normalization is and what role it plays in the database design process About the normal forms 1NF, 2NF, 3NF, BCNF, and 4NF How normal forms can be transformed from lower normal forms to higher normal forms
E N D
Chapter 5 • Normalization • An Normalization example INSS 651
Learning Objectives • What normalization is and what role it plays in the database design process • About the normal forms 1NF, 2NF, 3NF, BCNF, and 4NF • How normal forms can be transformed from lower normal forms to higher normal forms • That normalization and ER modeling are used concurrently to produce a good database design • That some situations require denormalization to generate information efficiently INSS 651
Normalization A process for evaluating and correcting table structure Minimize data redundancy Eliminate Anomalies INSS 651
Is Normalization Necessary? NO But it is helpful to maintain data integrity and consistency INSS 651
Anomalies(look at table 5.1) • Update—requires update in multiple locations • Deletion—A deletion may lose important information • Insertion—Requires complete definitions, ie does see page 187 (an employee can not be entered unless he is assigned a project INSS 651
Normalization Process • 1st NF • 2nd NF • 3rd NF • Almost for 90-98% application 3rd NF is sufficient INSS 651
Dependency When an attribute value depends on attribute B then B is dependent on A A---B or values of B can be determined by value of A, reverse may or may not be true Ex: ssn--Name SSN, CID--Grade INSS 651
Un-normalized relation Remove REPEATING groups 1st NF Remove PARTIAL dependency 2nd NF Remove TRANSIENT dependency 3rd NF Every determinant is a candidate key Boyce-CODD NF If we can convert a relation into 3NF almost 90-98% of anomalies are removed INSS 651
The Need for Normalization (continued) • Structure of data set in Figure 5.1 does not handle data very well • The table structure appears to work; report is generated with ease • Unfortunately, the report may yield different results, depending on what data anomaly has occurred INSS 651
1st NF • Remove repeating groups ASSIGNMENT (Proj_num, proj_name(Emp_num,E_name,job_class,chg_hours,Hour)) INSS 651
Un-normalized form A relation is in un-normalized form, if it contains repeating group Typically shown in parentheses Ex: PART NO DESC. VENDOR-NAME ADDRESS UNIT-COST 1234 LOGIC INTEL SAN JOSE 150.00 chip LSI LOGIC SAN JOSE 120.00 5678 MEMORY INTEL SAN JOSE 50.00 chip SUPPLIER (Part_no, Part_DESC, (Vendor_name, Vendor_address, Unit_cost)) INSS 651
1st NF A relation is in 1st NF if it does NOT contain any repeating groups (Part_no, Part_DESC, (Vendor_name, Vendor_address, Unit_cost)) 1st NF..remove repeating groups Break it into TWO relations One without repeating group and ONE with repeating group AND PK of other relation S1 (Part_no, Part_DESC) S2 (Vendor_name, Part_no, Vendor_address, Unit_cost INSS 651
2nd NF A relation is in 2nf NF if it is in 1stNF and it does not contain any partial dependency Partial dependency: A partial dependency exists if an attribute is dependent ONLY on PART of the PK and the WHOLE PK We must examine each relation for partial dependency NOTE: A partial dependency can only exist if there are more than ONE attribute as PK INSS 651
S1 (Part_no, Part_DESC) S2 (Vendor_name, Part_no, Vendor_address, Unit_cost Note S1 is already in 2nd NF since there is only attribute as PK In S2: Question is Vendor_address dependent on BOTH vendor_name AND Part_NO? Question is Unit_price dependent on BOTH vendor_name AND Part_NO? INSS 651
Question is Vendor_address dependent on BOTH vendor_name AND Part_NO? Answer: NO Give me vendor_no and I can find vendor_address, we do NOT need Part_No to know vendor_address, ie Vendor_address depends ONLY Vendor_name, hence the partial dependency INSS 651
Question is Unit_price dependent on BOTH vendor_name AND Part_NO? YES if you examine the table, price changes with vendor and part_no, ie price depnds on both Part_no AND which vendor supplies it INSS 651
Remove Partial Dependency VENDOR _ADDRESS VENDOR_name UNIT_PRICE PART# Create TWO tables: One with Partial dependency and other without it S21 (Vendor_name, vendor_address) S22(Vendor_name, Part_no, Unit_price) INSS 651
3rd NF A relation is in 3rd NF if it is in 2nd NF and it does not contain any transitive dependency Transitive dependency: A transitive dependency exists when some of the non-key attributes are dependent on other non-key attributes INSS 651
So far we have three relations that are in at least 2nd NF S1 (Part_no, Part_DESC) S21 (Vendor_name, vendor_address) S22(Vendor_name, Part_no, Unit_price) S1, S21 & S22 are also in 3rd NF since there is ONLY ONE non_key attribute and transitive dependency can NOT exist INSS 651
ERD VENDOR PART PART-SUPPLIED INSS 651
Q6/p 84 INSS 651
Q8/P187 Table P5.8 Sample ITEM Records INSS 651
Problem 8 Solution BLDG_MANAGER ITEM_ID ITEM_DESCRIPTION BLDG_ROOM BLDG_CODE BLDG_NAME INSS 651
BLDG_MANAGER ITEM_ID ITEM_DESCRIPTION BLDG_ROOM BLDG_CODE BLDG_NAME Problem 9 Solution: All tables in 3NF ITEM_ID ITEM_DESCRIPTION BLDG_ROOM BLDG_CODE BLDG_CODE BLDG_NAME EMP_CODE EMP_CODE EMP_FNAME EMP_INITIAL EMP_LNAME INSS 651
Denormalization • Reversing normalization • i.e from 3rd NF to 2nd NF • Or 2nd to 1st NF INSS 651
Convert into 3NF INVOICE (Inv_num, cust_num,lastname,Firstname,street,city,state,zip,date,(partnum, description,price,numshipped)) INSS 651