A finite set of pairs

1. LagrangianFloer theory of arbitrary genusandGromov-Witten invariantKenji Fukaya(Kyoto University)at University Miami (US)

2. A finite set of pairs (relatively spin) Lagrangiansubmanifolds weak bounding cochains A cyclic unital filtered A inifinity category set of objects set of morphisms F, Oh, Ohta, Ono (FOOO) (+ Abouzaid FOOO (AFOOO))

3. Hochshildcohomology Hochshild homology Cyclic cohomology Cyclic homology Open closed maps FOOO , AFOOO

4. Gromov-Witten invariant Counting genus g pseudo-holomorphic maps intersecting with cycles in X

5. Problem to study or Compute in terms of the structures of

6. structure. relation

7. Inner product and cyclicity is (up to sign) a Poincare duality on cyclicity

8. Problem to study or Compute in terms of the structures of

9. NO we can't ! Answer is determined by the structures of in case In general we need extra information. I will explain those extra information below. It is LagrangianFloer theory of higher genus (loop).

10. dIBL structure (differential involutive bi-Lie structure) on B 3 kinds of operations differential Jacobi Lie bracket co Jacobi co Lie Bracket is a derivation with respect to d is a coderivation

11. is compatible with Involutive a

12. IBL infinity structure = its homotopy everything analogue operations : Homotopy theory of IBL infinity structure is built (Cielibak-Fukaya-Latschev)

13. chain complex with inner product (dual cyclic bar complex) has a structure of dIBL algebra (cf. Cielibak-F-Latschev) basis of C

15. There is a category version. Dual cyclic bar complex has dIBLstructure Remark: This structure does NOT (yet) use operations mk except the classical part of m1, that is the usual boundary operator.

16. Cyclic stucture(operations mk)on satisfying Maurer-Cartan equation This is induced by a holomorphic DISK

17. is given by relation among

18. Theorem(LagrangianFloer theory of arbitrary genus) (to be written up) There exists such that BV master equation is satisfied. The gauge equivalence class of is well-defined.

19. Note: induces and

20. induces

21. is obtained from moduli space of genus g bordered Riemann surface with boundary components

23. Remark： (1): In case the target space M is a point, a kind of this theorem appeared in papers by various people including Baranikov, Costello Voronov, etc. (In Physics there is much older work by Zwieback.) (2): Theorem itself is also expected to hold by various people including F for a long time. (3): The most difficult part of the proof is transversality. It becomes possible by recent progress on the understanding of transversality issues. It works so far only over . It also requires machinery from homological algebra of IBL infinity structure to work out the problem related to take projective limit, in the same way as A infinity case of [FOOO]. This homological algebra is provided by Cielibak-F-Latshev. (4): Because of all these, the novel part of the proof of this theorem is extremely technical. So I understand that it should be written up carefully before being really established. (5): In that sense the novel point of this talk is the next theorem (in slide 33) which contains novel point in the statement also.

24. Relation to `A model Hodge structure' We need a digression first. Put Let We (AFOOO) have an explicit formula to calculate it based on Cardy relation.

25. Formula for

26. Theorem (AFOOO, FOOO ....) a basis of

27. Hochshild complex Let be the operator obtained by `circle' action. Hochshild homology is homology of the free loop space of L. is obtained from the S1 action on the free loop space.

28. Hochshild complex Let be the operator obtained by `circle' action. Proposition it implies that there exists if Zis non-degenerate such that because 2nd of BV master equation

29. Corollary(Hodge – de Rham degeneration) (Conjectured by Kontsevitch-Soibelman) If Z is non-degenerate then Remark: This uses only : moduli space of annulus. To recover we must to use all the informations

30. Remark: Why this is called `Hodge – de Rham degeneration' ? Hodge structure uses with One main result of Hodge theory is we may rewrite this to is independent of u We have Put is independent of u

31. Floer's boundary operator Landau-Gizburg potential Table from Saito-Takahashi's paper FROM PRIMITIVE FORMS TO FROBENIUS MANIFOLDS (Similar table is also in a paper by Katzarkov-Kontsevich-Pantev) plus paring between HH* and HH*

32. MainTheorem(work in progress) The gauge equivalence class of determines Gromov-Witten invariants for if Z is non-degenerate.

33. Idea of the proof of Main theorem Metric Ribbon tree Bordered Riemann surface Example: 2 loop

34. 1 1 1

36. Moduli of metric ribbon graph = etc. Moduli of genus g Riemann surface with marked points This isomorphism was used in Kontsevich's proof of Witten conjecture

37. is identified with moduli space of bordered Riemann surface. Fix and consider the family parametrised by

38. Consider one parameter family of moduli spaces L L

39. Study the limit when ? ?

40. etc. (various combinatorial types depending on .)

41. Counting gives More precisely integrating the forms on the moduli space by the evaluation map using the boundary marked points

42. Counting We obtain numbers that can be calculated from

43. Actually we need to work it out more carefully. Let and try to compute Need to use actually

44. Forgetting defines is identified with the total space of complex line bundle over (the fiber of is identified to the tangent space of the unique interior marked point.) (The absolute value corresponds to c the phase S1 corresponds to the extra freedom to glue.)

45. is not a trivial bundle. (Its chern class is Mumford-Morita class.) So is not homlogous to a class in the boundary.

46. is homologous to a class on the boundary and here D is Poincare dual to the c1 a class on the boundary

47. something coming from boundary. Because is a union of S1 orbits, then Hodge to de Rham degeneration and

48. A a class on the boundary and and are determined by QED