1 / 17

The Functions of Language - Intentional and Unintentional Communication

The Functions of Language - Intentional and Unintentional Communication. EDL 1201 Linguistics for the Language Teacher. Discussions about the functions of language. Chomsky says it is what might be called as the ‘ human essence ’. Corder states that ‘ too complex to be defined ’

dseifert
Download Presentation

The Functions of Language - Intentional and Unintentional Communication

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Functions of Language- Intentional and Unintentional Communication EDL 1201 Linguistics for the Language Teacher

  2. Discussions about the functions of language • Chomsky says it is what might be called as the ‘human essence’. • Corder states that ‘too complex to be defined’ • Cook states it as ‘the heart of human life’ • Poole defines it as “the faculty for communication by speech sounds, is a universal characteristic of the human race’

  3. Many linguists have defined it as: • - by which man communicates • - a system of communication • - for the purposes of communication and many others which serves the many needs of humans.

  4. What are the functions of language? • To communicate • To maintain good or bad relations with others (make small talk/ negative functions) • To entertain (amusing ourselves & others) • To inform/ passing on information (Trask & Mayblin 2002)

  5. Language as means of Communication • Pit Corder states that we have to make a distinction between ‘intentional’ and ‘unintentional ‘ communication in order to understand what language is in communication. • Intentional comm. • Unintentional comm.

  6. Intentional comm. • That is to convey messages through speech acts, or non speech acts. • There is the intent to really pass on some information, like giving a speech, a lecture, a talk, or merely talking to others. • Walking, for instance, can be termed as communicating intentionally. How? • “She flounced out off the room and slammed the door.”

  7. Unintentional comm. • Corder gives the example of – if we see a friend walking - unobserved by him, within fairly broad limits, we may be able to draw some conclusions about him. About what? • His walk tells us something about him– his state of mind or health, for instance. • But, no one would suggest that he is walking that way, in order to communicate with us?? • What does this tell us?

  8. unintentional comm.2 All our behaviour, in some measure is communicative – receiver learns smthg, even tho the sender has no speific intention to comm. • So, as to conclude – behaviour is informative and communicative.

  9. Unintentional comm3 • As we can tell someone from her walk, we can as well gain info from someone’s else voice. We can infer certain things from a person’s voice. • By the tone of voice – we can tell if a person is excited, angry, or tired. • What about disguising one’s voice? – to mislead? • Conclusion – all human behaviour can be informative, and can be a mode of communication.

  10. So, the distinction? • The distinction between intentional and unintentional communication lies in the sender’s mind. • The distinction between ‘being informed’ and ‘not being informed’ lies in the receiver’s mind.

  11. 2nd distinction? • Is between linguistic and non linguistic communication • Trying to establish communication with a friend. • Linguistically – one may wave and then say “Hey Bob, come here a moment.” • Non-linguistically – making an ill articulated sound and then some actions, which in convention is agreeable to both sender and receiver, means the same as above.

  12. Is there a distinction? • linguists state that the distinction is unclear • Writing is also linguistically communicative and intentional, but it is not verbal • We use ‘coughs’, ‘shouts’, ‘yawns’ and a wide range of other vocal signals, but few linguists would regard that as ‘linguistic’. • But what all linguists agree on, is the presence of the human cognitive aspect.

  13. Communication and Meaning • Humans can communicate intentionally by other than linguistic means. • – our posture, walk, tone of voice, gesture, our manner of walking, dressing and eating can mean something to others. • But, it has to have the conventional element to it to be accepted and understood by others. • Eg – behaviour like – ‘liking someone’, ‘angry’, other emotions. (how do show disliking, envy, etc.)

  14. Humans live in a society, and there are behaviours that we learned in our society and acceptable and understood specifically in that society group. This is what it means by having a conventional element in it. • For example- a tired walk: there is an accepted way of walking which means tired. • What about ‘like’? or ‘embarrassed’? ‘shy’? – probably all our behavior has a conventional element in them.

  15. Behaviour to communicate • Any deliberate manipulation of bodily behaviour is called ‘paralinguistics’. • These includes – gestures, posture, facial expressions, and the tempo, pitch, and quality of speech. • Exploiting both speech and paralinguistics would mean a clearer communication can be established.

  16. What is communicated? • Traditionally it is ‘Thought’, or ‘expressing our thoughts’.. • But that is not its only function. Language can be used to communicate beliefs, opinions or perceptions, small talk, etc. • However, a bit of language cannot be taken out of context, in isolation from the situation and context it is made. Eg. “I love you.” – means so many things if taken out of context, can be misunderstood.

  17. Further readings • Finegan, Chapt 1, pp. 18-31 • Read also on the ‘properties of the human language’.

More Related