110 likes | 124 Views
This document provides an update on the validation process for the National Geospatial Data Set Assets, including the status of coordination group meetings and the validation tool.
E N D
December 8, 2009 Coordination Group Meeting National Geospatial Data Set Assets:Status on Validation Process Wendy Blake Coleman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Blake-Coleman.Wendy@epa.gov
Validation Process • Ascertain Agency Support for National Geospatial Dataset Assets and A-16 portfolio process • Response still needed from agencies- December 2009 • OMB concurs with concept wants more specificity in A-16 Supplemental Guidance -12/03/09 • Meet with CG/LMW to discuss validation tool and overall process 11/05/09 Identified need to: • Clean up of 2008 data results-November/December 2009 • Meet with statistician to discuss design and post survey analysis approach-ongoing • Finalize survey design and approach-January 2010 • Discuss concepts and process with Executive Steering Committee- By early January 2010
Validation Process, Cont’d. • Identified needs, cont’d. • Federal-wide Survey- January/February 2010 • Initial proposal no later than early March 2010 • Consider broader stakeholder involvement through options such as • “National Forum” session (s) on proposed National Geospatial Data Set Assets- Spring 2010 • Key NGOs (representing States, Tribes, local governments, private sector) • States and Tribes • Public • A public comment period on survey results –Spring 2010 • Linkage to themes • Continue to refine theme definitions on parallel track – By February 2010 • Work with Stakeholders to “associate” appropriate groupings of National Geospatial Dataset Asserts to themes –after validation of data sets
Validation Process - Survey SURVEY GOAL: Obtain an understanding of how data sets support business and the breath of use to inform decision on list of National Geospatial Data Assets • Key Questions Addressed at the 11/05/09 Meeting • Which Survey questions should be asked to meet the survey objective? • How wide a distribution/who should be the recipients as all Agencies are organized differently?
Validation Process – Survey Questions • Nine potential survey questions posed to the CG/LWM group on 11/05/09 • Group recommended fewer and simpler questions than originally proposed • Does your agency use this dataset? (Yes, No) • If no, skip dataset • If yes, is it critical to your business? • If yes, for what initiative area do you use the dataset? • If yes, does your agency invest in this dataset? • If no, skip question below • If yes, dollars or in-kind, etc. • If yes, do you have non-federal agency partners who use this?
Validation Process – Survey Questions, Cont’d. • Issues • Need for consistency to make assessment • Need for direct linkage to FEA and specific presidential initiatives particularly after conversations on 12/01-03, 2009 • Actions • Initiated discussion with EPA statistician on survey goals, correct questions top reach goals, and result analysis • Will work with GSA GC member on usability design • Request to schedule discussion with Executive Steering Committee for their input
Validation Process - Distribution • Distribution Target • Federal Government • send to all 32 FGDC member agencies • sense agencies know their geospatial data users/producers who should answer • Outside Federal government • Consensus not reached • Some thoughts • states/tribes need to be involved early on • use current theme leads to vet with their communities • survey the membership of various non-Federal groups • publish the results for public comment as a later part of the validation process • Convene a spring National Geospatial Forum around the list
Validation Process – Distribution, Cont’d. • Issues • For Federal consistency, should request be made for input from enterprise EA and GEO groups? • How is a consistent business view ensured? • Need to vet approach with the Executive Steering Committee • Actions • For Federal consistency, should request be made for input from enterprise EA and GEO groups? • How is a consistent business view ensured? • Need to vet approach with the Executive Steering Committee
Proposed Process for Validation • Finalize data clean-up package and Send to agencies 12/04/09 • Convene 2 Technical Assistance Sessions- Weeks of 12/07/09 and 12/13/09 • Review Results – By 1/15/10 • Follow-on with agencies as necessary • Share list with CG for last review • Finalize questions and distribution approach for Validation Survey- By 1/20/10 • Discussions with • Statisticians • Survey designers • Executive Steering Committee • OMB? • Final review and approval by CG, Executive Steering Committee, OMB(?), NGAC?
Proposed Process for Validation, Cont’d. • Send Survey to targeted audience for 2-3 week response- By 1/25/09 • Convene 2-3 Technical Assistance Sessions- 1/25-30/10 • Review and analyze results -2/10 • Follow-on with agencies as necessary • CG subgroup assess data with approach suggested by statistician • Recommended list produced • Review and concurrence by CG, executive Steering Committee, OMB, and Steering Committee-By 3/10 • Involve broader Stakeholder community in review of proposed list- By 4/10
Wendy Blake Coleman U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Blake-Coleman.Wendy@epa.gov