1 / 12

Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley

Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley. Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne. 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg. Motivation.

dspear
Download Presentation

Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology, University of Cologne 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  2. Motivation 30 July 2007, Murg Valley IR sky temperature + LWP • Clouds are complex in - time/space- microphysics • Observations need to captureall characteristics see Poster by Kneifel et al. for spatio-temporal structure • Liquid water content (LWC)can not be observed by a single instrument Integrated Profiling Technique UTC 14 13 12 11 N W S E N • LWC is important- as prognostic parameter in NWP/climate models- in describing cloud radiative effects- for predicting attenuation in radio propagation problems •  due to scarsity of observations simple cloud models were developed to diagnose LWC profiles from radiosonde measurements 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg 2

  3. Motivation • How are water clouds characterized in the Murg valley during April – December 2007? • „observations“ • How are they represented by models? •  Comparison to • simple cloud models • (NWP model COSMO-DE) Cloudnet Target Classification (provided by Ewan O‘Connor) Integrated Profiling Technique 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  4. Integrated Profiling Technique (IPT) – Overview • provides continuous vertical profiles of temperature, humidity and liquid water content (LWC); first attempts to derive droplet number concentration  data set of retrieved profiles available for April – December 2007! Retrieval CloudNet Target Categorization: • Each pixel is categorized in terms of the presence of liquid droplets, ice, insects or aerosol. • Discrimination between precipitating and non-precipitating clouds. • Microwave radiometers • Cloud radar • A priori information (radiosondes) Integration of measurements in the framework of optimal estimation: inversion method including - instrument characteristics (theory, error) - forward model, i.e. radiative transfer, Z- LWC-relationship - background information 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  5. RH sonde Rhcrit modad / Decker Rhcrit Salonen 06 Cloud models - overview Simple cloud models: diagnosis of clouds from radiosonde profiles • Modified adiabatic approach (Karstens et al., 1994) • Decker model (Decker et al., 1978) • modified Salonen model (Mattioli et al., 2006) General principle: • Localization of cloud base and cloud top height • Calculation of LWC: • depending on height over cloud base (Mod.ad., Salonen) • depending on cloud thickness (Decker), Min 0.05 gm-3, Max 0.2 gm-3 • Assumption: no water clouds below -20 °C 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  6. Results – Critical humidity thresholds Distribution of relative humidity (radiosonde) in cloudy pixels (April – December 2007); cloudy pixels: Cloudnet classification detects cloud droplets • detection of clouds from relative humidity profiles problematic 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  7. Results – Cloudnet and cloud models Number of clouds April-December 2007 Cloudnet classification profiles within 30 min. aftera RS ascent are taken into account for the comparison 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  8. Results – Cloud base height (lowest cloud) April-December 2007 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  9. Results – Cloud thickness distribution April-December 2007 • most frequent cloud thickness is 100-200 m • only ~17 % of clouds with thicknesses > 500 m • only ~10 % of clouds with thicknesses > 1000 m 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  10. Results - LWP For COSMO-DE evaluation more time steps and inclusion of fractional clouds needed! 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  11. Results - LWC 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg

  12. Summary • Derivation of liquid water, temperature and humidity profiles for nearly the whole AMF deployment (21.4.-31.12.2007) using the Integrated Profiling Technique  88110 profiles (cloudy: 33168) corresponding to 2706 hours (5 min sampling) • Most clouds are single layer, 100-200 m thick with low LWP • Simple cloud models based on RS profiles - overestimate the occurence of water clouds by ~25-35%- overestimate thin clouds (< 300 m)- overestimate of multilayer clouds and LWP • COSMO-Model evaluation is limited due to missing information on fractional cloudiness Outlook • Investigation of cloud radiative effects using IPT/Cloudnet data and single column version of the radiation code of the COSMO model • sensitivity studies, e.g. additional retrieval of number concentration 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg 7th COPS Workshop, 27 – 29 October 2008, Strasbourg 12

More Related