1 / 11

Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004

NAVY-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL DIALOG. V-22 International. Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004. The V-22 and the War on Terrorism. MC-130H (3). OPSEC considerations:. = moderate profile. = high profile. Physical security risk:. = low. = moderate. = high.

duena
Download Presentation

Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NAVY-INDUSTRY INTERNATIONAL DIALOG V-22 International Ken Moritz and Bo Goode NAVAIR PMA-275 18 January 2004

  2. The V-22and theWar onTerrorism

  3. MC-130H (3) OPSEC considerations: = moderate profile = high profile Physical security risk: = low = moderate = high Forces - Afghanistan [Prevent](without V-22) KC-135 KC-135 3 C-5s, helicopter teardown at Taegu 19 aircraft through Kadena KC-135 KC-135 2/75thRangers(100) MH-47E (4) C-5 (3) 5th SFG(12) DOE Tech(10) KC-135 C-17 (2) MH-53M (4) B-1 (3) KC-135 C-5 (3) KC-135 KC-135 KC-135 AC-130 (3) MC-130E (5) Complex; Multiple Failure Nodes

  4. MC-130H (3) OPSEC considerations: = moderate profile = high profile Physical security risk: = low = moderate = high Forces - Afghanistan [Prevent](with V-22) KC-135 KC-135 2/75th Rangers (100) CV-22 (7) 5th SFG(12) DOETech (10) KC-135 C-17 (2) B-1 (3) KC-135 KC-135 AC-130 (3) Simpler and More Likely to Succeed

  5. Scenario Prevent 1 Support Costs Afghanistan $1,852,165 $ 3,083,412 + + = $388,035 $2,307,342 $388,035 $610,801 $9,017,951 = + $2,171,621 $6,846,330 $337,935 $566,131 (Not actual number of tankers) (Not actual number of tankers) $13,167,494 $2,800,901 Total Air Costs

  6. V-22 Multi-Mission Applications for the UKFinal ReportSeptember, 1999

  7. Tilt-rotor Characteristics RequiredAdditional Missions The basic V-22 airframe, with the appropriate mission kits or system modifications, is suitable for all of the eight additional missions which were examined, but not modelled.

  8. Multi Mission Capability • In Flight Refueling (tanker) • At 600 nm radius, give away 2,500 lbs • At 200 nm radius, give away 16,500 lbs • COD/VOD/VERTREP • 24 personnel • 15,000 lbs cargo • 20,000 lbs internal • Special Operations • Single aircraft ops • Choice of USMC and SOCOM • ASW • Large area search • Small area localization • Airborne mine countermeasures • AEW • Search and Rescue • Peacetime and combat • 805 nm range (MV/HV mission) • Command & Control • NATO Reaction Force

  9. Public Web Site: http://pma275.navair.navy.mil

  10. Take-Away • Breaking the paradigm “It’s not a typical Helicopter, it’s a Tiltrotor” • Flight characteristics better than a conventional Helo • Significant increase in response time, survivability & maintainability • Unit cost slightly higher than conventional Helo but yields returns in capabilities + support footprint + manpower = lower operational cost • Reduce Type Model Series and gain • Multi-mission platform optimizes V-22 saving over life cycle • Mission support structure optimized (manpower, facilities & other platforms) • Interoperability with NATO and coalition partners • Cooperative development program opportunities • Support structure commonality

More Related