1 / 17

Evolutionary tracks of magnetic bright points as seen by IMaX/Sunrise

Evolutionary tracks of magnetic bright points as seen by IMaX/Sunrise. Utz Dominik Work performed in the frame of FWF project: Spektroskopische und statistische Untersuchungen an MBPs (FWF J3176 ). D. Utz 1,2 , J. C. del Toro Iniesta 1 , L. R. Bellot Rubio 1 , J. Jurčák 3

dugan
Download Presentation

Evolutionary tracks of magnetic bright points as seen by IMaX/Sunrise

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Evolutionary tracks of magnetic bright points as seen by IMaX/Sunrise Utz Dominik Work performed in the frame of FWF project: Spektroskopische und statistische Untersuchungen an MBPs(FWF J3176) D. Utz1,2, J. C. del Toro Iniesta1, L. R. Bellot Rubio1, J. Jurčák3 Instituto de Astrofísica de Andalucía, CSIC, Granada, Spain1 IGAM, Institut of Physics, University of Graz, Austria2 Ondrejov Observatory, Czech Academy of Sciences3 Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  2. Contents of the Talk • Motivation • Background about MBPs • The Creation & Dissolution of MBPs • Sunrise/IMaX data • Mission and Data • Adaption of the Algorithm • Tracking of features • Results • Evolutionary Tracks • Statistical Results Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  3. Magnetic Bright Points • Small scale magnetic flux concentrations • kG fields • ~ 200 km diameters • Bright (especially in the G-band) • Found in intergranular regions • Lifetimes in min. range • Theoretical Models • Single isolated flux tubes • In the higher atmosphere canopy structue • Created by convective collapse process Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  4. Creation & Dissolution Phase I: Creation:-> by convective collapse?Phase II: stabile evolution; stabilisation by: ?Phase III: Dissolution; by ? Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  5. Sunrise/IMaX • Launched June the 8th 2009 • 1 m Gregorian telescope flownin the stratosphere about 30 km • Consists of SuFi & IMaX • Adaption works and preparationfor a second flight under way Imaging Magnetograph eXperiment: Fe line tripplet at 5250.2 Å different operation modes with 2, 4, 11 + cont. wavelength point sampling 50 by 50 arcsec2 FOV (0.055 ´´/pixel) Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  6. Image examples • Fig.: shows from left to right, top to bottom (color coded inversions): • IMaX, intensity continuum image (taken 227 mÅ off the line centre) • IMaX intensity blue flank image (-40 mÅ) used for tracking • IMaX total absolute circular polarisation • Magnetic field strength map • Magnetic field inclination map • LOS velocity map • Temperature maps @ log(τ) = 0, -1, -2 Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  7. Identified features Two types of features: <- wrongly identified granular features Correctly ->identified MBPs Difference in continuum line flank samples! -> using blue line flank for identification Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  8. Tracking An Example: • From the identification a set of x & y – positions • Requirements: • Considering maximum distance • Shortest total path • No crossings Two possible approaches: • Featuretrackassigning: • Uniquesolution • Singular usageof information • Complicatedtoimplement • Pointer assignment: • Easytoimplement • Non time invariant • Multipleussage of thesamepoint Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  9. Fig.: illustrating primary physical Fig.: illustration of physical parameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field strength, The temperature at log τ = 0 The line of sight velocity The temperature at log τ = -1 Fig.: continuation of physicalparameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field inclination, The temperature at log τ = -2 The diameter of the MBP structure The blue line flank intensity Evolutionary track case Iconvective collapse example • Fig.: shows the temporal evolution of a tracked MBP in the plasma parameter maps. From top to bottom: blue line flank continuum (-40 mÅ) off the line centre, continuum intensity map, temperature map, magnetic field strength map, line of sight velocity map, magnetic field strength map; The diamond marks the MBP feature. Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  10. Fig.: illustration of physical parameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field strength, The temperature at log τ = 0 The line of sight velocity The temperature at log τ = -1 Fig.: continuation of physicalparameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field inclination, The temperature at log τ = -2 The diameter of the MBP structure The blue line flank intensity Evolutionary track case IIabout the importance of upflows Look how correlated the downflow with this upflow is! • Fig.: same physical parameter maps as before.Interesting are the strong upflows close by to the strong downflows! Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  11. Fig.: illustration of physical parameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field strength, The temperature at log τ = 0 The line of sight velocity The temperature at log τ = -1 Fig.: continuation of physicalparameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field inclination, The temperature at log τ = -2 The diameter of the MBP structure The blue line flank intensity Evolutionary track case IIIno strong flows & nevertheless magnetic field amplification • Fig.: shows the plasma paraemters. There is no strong down/upflow at the time of magnetic field amplification. The obvious difference is we have already an extended patch of strong magnetic field. Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  12. Fig.: illustration of physical parameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field strength, The temperature at log τ = 0 The line of sight velocity The temperature at log τ = -1 Fig.: continuation of physicalparameters of MBP evolution. First row (left to right): The magnetic field inclination, The temperature at log τ = -2 The diameter of the MBP structure The blue line flank intensity Evolutionary track case IVa general (complex to interprete) case • Fig.: as before the plasma parameter map for a feature nicely situated in between granules. Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  13. Statistics Fig.: Upper panel: the LOS velocity component (sorted as before). The maximum and final measurements are given by the error bars.Lower panel: The magnetic field inclination angles (sorted in the same manner). The error bar gives again the maximum and final inclination. • Fig.: shows the magnetic field strength of the measured MBP tracks (sorted for increasing initial magnetic field strengths). The error bars give the maximum and final magnetic field strength during the track. Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  14. Statistics II Fig.: depicts the magnetic field strength distributions of: the maximum MBP field strengths (dark red), the initial magnetic field strengths (yellow), the dissolution field strength (black color), the complete FOV and of all MBP measurements, the later both normalised to the number of tracks (dashed orange and dashed brown). The right side gives the same plot as on the left but with logarithmic x-axis. The 3 dash-dotted vertical lines illustrate: the mean field strength (130 G), the mean plus 2 times the RMS value (300 G) and the equipartition field strength (420 G). Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  15. Conclusions I Where are we now? Even in deeper trouble as the starting point of the evolution seems to be not fixed anymore. Convecitve Collapse with QUESTION MARK! • Evolutionary tracks: • The convective collapse model is probably only one process leading to field amplification and is in reality much more complicated • Importance of close by strong transient upflows (2nd mechanism)? • For extended strong magnetic field patches (3rd mechanism)? • Mechanism working with time delays (4th mechanism)? • In general complicated to interprete • No clear answers about the stabilisation and dissolution phase Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  16. Conclusions II • Statistical part: • MBPs start out of a patch of equipartition strong magnetic field • Most don’t reach the kG region with mean amplification factors of 2 to 3 • Dissolution when the magnetic field drops down to mean magnetic fields plus 2 times the standard deviation • Mostly not too strong downflows but in general all the time downflows • Nearly no flow reversals • Magnetic field gets more inclined during the life (weaker inclinations in the beginning and in the end) • MBPs with stronger starting fields start more inclined (vertical) Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

  17. Discussion & Summary Fig.: There are definitely more worthwhile features to be studied (like aliens on the Sun).If you are interested in the topic, more details can be found (about the talk not the alien):Utz, D. et al. ApJ, 2013, under preparation: Magnetic bright point evolutionary tracks observed by IMaX/Sunrise Utz Dominik IV Reunión Española de Física Solar y Heliosférica

More Related