1 / 30

Land Use Near Freeways: Exposure Risk to Mobile Source Pollutants

Land Use Near Freeways: Exposure Risk to Mobile Source Pollutants. Gail Sandlin, Alon Bassok & Christine Bae University of Washington Department of Urban Design & Planning.

Download Presentation

Land Use Near Freeways: Exposure Risk to Mobile Source Pollutants

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Land Use Near Freeways: Exposure Risk to Mobile Source Pollutants Gail Sandlin, Alon Bassok & Christine Bae University of Washington Department of Urban Design & Planning

  2. Research question:Is there a disparate impact on low income and minority populations for exposure to mobile source pollutants? Examine the hypotheses that: • populations live or attend schools within proximity to freeways • socioeconomic demographics of populations within proximity to freeways indicates a high concentration of low income and minority

  3. Freeway Air Pollution Sheds (FAPS) in King County, WA, Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)

  4. FAPS and Portland UGB

  5. Trends in Vehicle Miles Traveled - Seattle area 1981-1992 Seattle & Portland 1990-1997 http://www.psrc.org/datapubs/pubs/trends/t2sep03.pdf http://mobility.tamu.edu

  6. -2000 Traffic Volume- Limited Access Freeways www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/annualtrafficreport.htm www.odot.state.or.us/tdb/traffic_monitoring/tvtable.htm

  7. http://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/pdfs/Pollution_Pie_2002.pdfhttp://www.ecy.wa.gov/programs/air/pdfs/Pollution_Pie_2002.pdf

  8. Environmental Health Traffic Studies • Germany: Wjst et al.1993 • Netherlands: Brunekreef’s collaborations 1997 to present • United States: • New York City & Boston (community based studies) • Upstate New York: Linet al • Los Angeles: • English et al. 1999 • Korenstein et al. 2002 • Zhu et al. 2002 • Gunier et al. 2003 • Green et al. 2004 • Italy: Crosignani et al. 2004

  9. Traffic & Adverse Health Effects 1. Proxy Exposure Methods • Distance ( 100 - 400 m) • Dispersion modeling • Monitoring studies • Traffic volume (AADT) • Traffic Density (road segments in buffer) • Percent Truck Traffic 2. Acute Short Term Exposure v. Long Term Low Level Exposure • Adverse health effects below regulatory levels 3.Cumulative and / or Synergistic Effects

  10. Dispersion of Ultrafine ParticlesZhu et al. (2002)

  11. I-5 northbound Traffic Volume: 2002 Annual Traffic ReportWA DOT http://www.wsdot.wa.gov/mapsdata/tdo/annualtrafficreport.htm

  12. RAMMET • Meteorological pre-processor – • prepares National Weather Service data for use in dispersion modeling • Scram Surface Met data • Seattle-Tacoma, 1991 • Scram Upper Air data • Quillayute Airport, 1991 • Created • .met output file • Wind Rose

  13. Wind Rose: 37% of time from southwest ~37% ;19% of time from northeast

  14. Cleveland playfield Cleveland High Maple Hill area Georgetown

  15. Cleveland High School

  16. Freeway Air Pollution Sheds (FAPS) in King County, WA, Urban Growth Boundary (UGB)

  17. School Demographics

  18. FAPS and Portland UGB

  19. School Demographics

  20. Methodology Ratio = Residential Units in FAPS Residential Units in Block Groups

  21. Residential Land Use in FAPS • King UGB SF units 6892 • King UGB MF units 15274 • Portland area UGB SF units 2676 • Portland area UGB MF units 4685

  22. Population X in FAPS Y Total population in FAPS Y ----------------------------------- Population X in UGB Total population in UGB Relative Concentration (RC) of the Vulnerable Pop. LQ =

  23. LQ ratio: FAPS to UGB

  24. LQ ratio: FAPS to UGB

  25. Residential infill within King FAPS 1990-2000: 981 SF homes 81 Apartment complexes (5,846 units) 1980 -1989: 357 SF homes 66 Apartment complexes (1,165 units)

  26. Conclusion • Populations live within proximity to major traffic freeways; with an increasing trend • With respect to area demographics, there is a higher concentration of minorities and low income populations living within proximity to major traffic freeways • Schools are located within proximity to major freeways and preliminary data indicate these schools are predominately low-income and minority

  27. Next Steps • Pierce County UGB • Senior facilities • Hot Spot analysis • Traffic volume, fleet composition • Dispersion modeling • Temperature, wind direction, topography • Microscale monitoring

More Related