320 likes | 334 Views
This text discusses the integration of systems perspectives in organizational theory, including closed systems, open systems, rational systems, and natural systems. It explores the theories proposed by Chester Barnard, Herbert Simon, Max Weber, and Talcott Parsons, as well as the integration suggested by Hoy and Miskel. It also delves into the rational systems perspective, scientific management, administrative management, and the human resources view.
E N D
EAD 800 Day 2 Valbonne 04 • Systems Theory • Learning Organizations • hypotheses
Systems Perspectives • Closed System • Open System • Rational System -Machine model -Structural view • Natural System -Human Relations -Human Resources
Closed Systems • Schools sealed off from outside • Isolated • Environment not considered
Open Systems • Influenced by environments • Dependent on environments • Inputs – Transformation – Outputs • Accommodates both rational and natural systems perspectives • Accommodates both formal and informal organizational perspectives
Theorists who suggested this integration: • Chester Barnard (1938) • Structure – individual, cooperative system, formal organization, complex formal organization, informal organization • Dynamic concepts – free will, cooperation, communication, authority, decision process, dynamic equilibrium
Theorists who suggested this integration: • Herbert Simon (1947) • Formal theory of motivation • Organization an exchange system – inducements exchanged for work • Organization limited in ability to collect and process information, search for alternatives, predict • Satisficing is decision making process
Theorists who suggested this integration: • Max Weber (1947) • Mainly aligned with scientific managers • Starting point for idea of social systems – discussions of bureaucracy and authority
Theorists who suggested this integration: • Talcott Parsons (1960) • Stressed importance of the environment on the organization • Anticipated conception of organization as an open system
Hoy & Miskel’s Integration • Open Systems • Rational Systems • Natural Systems
Rational Systems • The Machine Model - The beginning - Scientific Management and Administrative Management • The Structural Model - Contemporary View - Stress goal specificity and formalization
Scientific Management • Frederick Taylor (1947) • Workers need constant direction - Motivated by economics - Limited by physiology - Human engineers: worked up from the individual worker - Time and motion studies
Administrative Managers • Fayol (Urwick, 1937) and Gulick (1937) • POSDCoRB • Division of Labor (Specialization) • Span of Control • Principle of homogeneity (purpose, process, clientele, or location)
Scientific Management in Schools • Campbell et al. (1987) – parallel to field of administration • Bobbit (1913) – job analyses, component tasks, efficiency • Callahan (1962) – “cult of efficiency” • Kanigel (1997) – Taylorism not a “fad” – living tissue of America
Rational Systems: A Structural View • Behavior in organizations seen as purposeful, disciplined, and rational • Limitations of individual decision makers (authority, rules and regulations, compliance, coordination, opportunities, constraints)
Clear Goals - direct decisions - influence structure - specify tasks - guide resource allocation - govern design - avoid ambiguity Formalization - rules and codes - standardization - regulation - governs behavior - visible structure - fact-based decisions - work separate from feelings Rational Systems
Rational Systems • Seldon Wolin (1960) “ Organization, by simplifying and routinizing procedures, eliminates the need for surpassing talent. It is predicated on average human beings.”
Criticism of Rational Systems • Rigid conception of organizations • Structure and function affected by environment • Undue emphasis on parts rather than the whole
Natural Systems • Roots in Human Relations Movement - Mary Parker Follett (1924) Dynamic and harmonious relat. - Mayo & Roethlisberger (1939) Hawthorne studies – illumination and work efficiency
Hawthorne Studies • Informal organization – worker behavior did not conform to official job specifications - Interaction patterns (cliques) - Informal norms - Behavior not a function of economic considerations
Criticisms of Human Relations Perspective • Doesn’t take into account “conflicting values” • Not all one happy family • Concern for workers can be manipulative rather than genuine • Often manifest in a series of “prescriptions” about how things should be and how individuals should behave.
Human Resources View • Organizations are social groups trying to adapt and survive their particular situations • Formal goals and structures often have little to do with what actually occurs in organizations • Survival and equilibrium override other goals
Human Resources View • Organizations are vehicles for humans to satisfy their human needs • People are valuable resources for the organization • Informal organization emphasized over formal organization
Human Resources View • Workers bring heads and hearts to work • Needs, beliefs, values and motivations • Generate informal norms, status structures, power relations, communication networks and working arrangements
A bit more about Open Systems • Inputs – Transformation – Outputs • Feedback • Boundaries • Environment • Homeostasis (equilibrium/disequilibrium) • Entropy • Equifinality
Elements of School Social System • Structure (bureaucratic expectation) • Individual (cognition & motivation) • Culture (shared orientations) • Politics (power relations) • Technical core (teaching and learning) • Environment p. 24
Feedback • Internal feedback loops - formal structure - informal structure • External feedback loops - Community - Accountability indicators - State/national mandates (ESEA)
Schools as Learning Organizations • Systems thinking • Participants expand capacities to create and achieve • Novel patterns of thinking are encouraged • Collective aspirations are nurtured • Participants learn to learn together • Organization increases problem solving capabilities (Senge, 1990; Watson & Marsick, 1993)
Learning Organizations An organization in which the participants pursue common purposes with a collective commitment to routinely assessing the value of those purposes, modifying them when appropriate, and continually developing more effective and efficient ways to achieve those purposes. (Leithwood & Louis, 1998)
Learning Organizations Long on rhetoric and theoretical analysis and short on research. Weick & Westley, 1996 Hoy & Miskel, 2000
The Capacity for Organizational LearningLouis & Marks, 1999; Louis, Marks & Printy, 2000 • Simplified organizational structure • Participative decision making • Shared commitment and collaborative activity • Adequate knowledge and skills • Transformational leadership • Feedback and accountability
Summary Pages • Rational Systems – pp. 13/14 • Natural Systems – pp. 17/18 • Schools as social systems – pp. 22-23
Research questions and hypotheses • Research questions can guide research when the analyst does not have a clear indication of relationship – no prior research, for example. • Hypotheses guide research when a specific relationship has some empirical support. See p. 30.