330 likes | 573 Views
PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont'd)At each level, increasingly advanced,complex play.Levels of play:functional: simple, repetitive motionconstructive: make things (with blocks, etc.)make-believegames with rules. Internet GamesProsdexterityattention spanspatial skillsConsviolencestereo
E N D
1. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING Peers:
Infants: aware of difference between
children and adults, positive reaction.
2-5 years:
parallel play: side by side
associative play: exchanges of toys
cooperative play: common play
2. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
At each level, increasingly advanced,
complex play.
Levels of play:
functional: simple, repetitive motion
constructive: make things (with blocks, etc.)
make-believe
games with rules
3. Internet Games
Pros
dexterity
attention span
spatial skills
Cons
violence
stereotypes
addiction
Communication:
if it is a substitution for face to face can lead to isolation, dangers (predators)
4. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
How is social behaviour affected by
perspective-taking? (see text)
Development of friendships:
Playmate (4-7 years). Sharing toys and games, liking.
Playmate + trust, special qualities (8-10 years). More so for girls.
Intimacy and loyalty (11-15 years).
5. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Gender differences:
Girls more emotional intimacy, verbal
disclosure, boys more shared activities,
team sports, being together.
6. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Friendship correlates with:
social skills
stress coping
school performance
7. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Use of sociometric techniques to evaluate
kids.
Categories:
Popular: two types
pro-social: cooperative, constructive, considerate
anti-social: tough, defiant, perhaps good at sports (boys), ignoring and excluding others, spreading rumours
8. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Rejected: two types
Aggressive: nasty, bullies, high conflict
Withdrawn: high social anxiety, awkward, fearful
Controversial (both liked and disliked)
Marginal or neglected
9. Bullying and cyberbullying
now serious, pervasive problem
general aggression increasing world-wide
www.bullying.org
10. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Important variables: appearance and social
skills.
Adolescence: belongingness to peer group
is paramount.
Dress codes
Dominance hierarchies
Conformity
Drugs and alcohol
11. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Rejected and marginals can coalesce to
seek revenge on dominant groups: bullying,
school murders, or lone operator.
Cliques: + 6 kids with similar backgrounds, values, attitudes and interests
Crowd: several cliques with the same salient characteristics: “brains”, “jocks” etc.
12. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Television
More time spent than on any other activity.
Use of TV as pacifier and babysitter, reward.
Content more important than total number of hours to predict academics, choice of role models and extra-curricular activities.
13. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Problems with reality vs. fantasy until
5-7 years old.
Stereotyping: gender and ethnic: both
programs and ads, ads worse. Correlation
between amount of viewing and
stereotypical beliefs.
14. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Body image: dieting girls ? disordered eating ? eating disorders (anorexia and bulimia)
TV and obesity highly
Children as advertisers’ targets:
materialistic values
sex
poor nutrition
body image: thin models, unrealistic
15. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Social learning theory:
modeling and imitation
behavioural repertoire
performance vs. learning
Bandura (Bobo dolls)
vicarious reinforcement, punishment
16. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
TV and violence and aggression:
Cartoons: most
Repeated aggressive acts
Unpunished
Message: way to solve conflict.
17. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Cooperative vs. aggressive modeling:
Cooperative: more complex message,
easily missed
Aggressive: simple and salient
Heavy viewers more accepting of violence.
18. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Drabman and Thomas (1976)
Grade 5s into two groups:
Watched detective show (high violence).
Watched baseball game (low violence).
19. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
DV: assigned to watch two younger kids on
a monitor and deal with misbehaviour.
Also develop perception of society as
violent and adjust behavious to fit.
“Copy cat” murders.
20. HUESMAN (1986)
Effects:
Children learn new ways of aggressing by watching more aggressive models.
TV violence weakens the child’s restraints over aggression.
Children’s beliefs about the consequences of violence are shaped by the observed consequences.
21. HUESMAN (1986) (Cont’d)
Desensitizes the observer, who habituates to its negative effects.
Alters observer’s sense of reality.
Leads children to fantasize about their own potential aggressive actions, especially if they identify with aggressor.
22. STRAGEGIES FOR REGULATING CHILDREN’S TV VIEWING
Limit TV viewing.
Avoid using TV as a reinforcer.
Encourage child appropriate viewing.
Explain televised information to children.
23. STRAGEGIES FOR REGULATING CHILDREN’S TV VIEWING (Cont’d)
Link televised content to everyday learning.
Model good viewing practices.
Use a warm, rational approach to child rearing.
24. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
TV promotes violence and hostility.
Double effect: aggressive kids watch more
violence.
Computers: benefits, drawbacks
Sexism
Sexual predators
Pornography
25. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
List benefits for development.
School
Positive and negative influences from
teachers and peers.
26. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
During school years:
increasingly prosocial
increased verbal communication
rough and tumble play
increasing importance of peers
role of parents: encouragement and regulation of play materials (e.g. art stuff vs. guns)
27. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Traditional classroom: student passive,
teacher directive, ruler.
Constructivist classroom: students construct
their own knowledge (Piaget).
Problem: teachers trained traditionally.
28. PEERS, MEDIA AND SCHOOLING (Cont’d)
Smaller size schools more beneficial in
every respect. Transition to bigger school
can affect academics, social life,
self-esteem.
Teacher expectations: self-fulfilling prophecy.
Poor eating habits, junk food.
29. Contrast between Asian (collectivistic culture) and
Western (individualistic culture)
Asians
invest more money on education, including teachers’ salaries
teachers have high status
more emphasis on science and technology due to fewer natural resources
emphasize effort over natural ability
parents (mothers) spend more time and effort doing homework with the children
30. Asians (Cont’d)
children see doing well as a moral and social responsibility toward parents and community, don’t want to bring shame to them
they don’t see doing well as an individual source of glory
instruction is higher quality and with more depth
the school year is longer
teachers spend more time helping individual students after hours
8-hour school day allows for relevant field trips and hands-on activities without sacrificing classroom productive time
31. Other countries, e.g. Argentina (modelled on
European system):
all high schools (age 13-18) have a 3-year basic cycle
last two years diverge into
university preparation (baccalaureate)
teaching stream (normal school)
trades school-apprenticeship (industrial school)