1 / 9

Evidence for X(3872)  g J/ y

Evidence for X(3872)  g J/ y. S.-K. Choi Gyeongsang U. S. L. Olsen U of Hawaii. Belle ICPV meeting Jan 27, 2005. Select B ± K ± J/ y g (B 0 K S J/ y g running now). Tight J/ y cuts Loose K ± cuts E g >40 MeV p 0 veto ( c 2 >4.0) K* veto (M(K g )>1.0 GeV

dyan
Download Presentation

Evidence for X(3872)  g J/ y

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Evidence for X(3872)gJ/y S.-K. Choi Gyeongsang U S. L. Olsen U of Hawaii Belle ICPV meeting Jan 27, 2005

  2. Select B±K± J/yg(B0KS J/yg running now) • Tight J/y cuts • Loose K± cuts • Eg>40 MeV • p0 veto (c2>4.0) • K* veto (M(Kg)>1.0 GeV • R2<0.4; |cosqB| < 0.8 • |Mbc – 5.28|<0.0055 GeV (2s) • |DE|<0.03 GeV (2s) • E7  E37

  3. M(g J/y) BKcc1; cc1g J/y X signal Region ±32 MeV X(3872)? M(gJ/y)

  4. Expand cc1 region Fit to determine sM(gJ/y) =10.7 MeV |M(gJ/y) – mcc1| < 25 MeV (± 2.4s) Use these fits to get means & sigmas for Mbc and DE Nev(cc1) = 510 ± 23

  5. M(g J/y) in X(3872) region ±64 MeV ±32 MeV M(gJ/y) sideband X(3872) Use this fit to get Efact for ARGUS Nev(X3872) = 10.5 ± 4.0 Signif =  2lnL(0) -2lnL(10.5) = 4.8 s No peaking background

  6. Br(Xg J/y) determination Br(Xg J/y) Br(Xp+p-J/y) = Nev(Xg J/y) Nev(cc1g J/y) Nev(Xp+p-J/y) Nev(y’ p+p-J/y) e(cc1g J/y) e(y’g J/y) e(y’ p+p-J/y) e(Xp+p-J/y) Br(BKcc1)Br(cc1g J/y) Br(BKy’) Br(y’p+p-J/y)   from PDG 1.02 ± 0.22 data: 0.30 ± 0.13 ~1.02± 0.10 = 0.30 ± 0.13 ± 0.06 (Previous 90% CL upper limit was <0.4)

  7. Could the X(3872) be the cc1’ ? Rough expectation for pure charmonium: Barnes, Godfrey hep-ph/0311162 G(23P1 g J/y) ~ 11 keV G(23P1 ppJ/y) ~ G(y’ po J/y) ~ 0 (0.3 keV) ~30 isospin violating we measure 0.3; two orders-of-magnitude smaller; cc1’ component of the X(3872) must be small

  8. Summary • X(3872)gJ/y / X(3872)p+p-J/y=0.30±0.13±0.06 • this says X must have C=+ (as does the XwJ/y obs.) • if 1++ (as ang. analyses prefer), can’t be too much cc1’ • Next: add B0 KSg J/y & look at E39 • improve signal to > 5s??

  9. status Rejected by ang. analyses XgJ/y forbidden

More Related