540 likes | 683 Views
Empirical Financial Economics. Ex post conditioning issues. Fama Fisher Jensen and Roll. FFJR Redux. FFJR Redux. Overview. A simple example Brief review of ex post conditioning issues Implications for tests of Efficient Markets Hypothesis. Performance measurement.
E N D
Empirical Financial Economics Ex post conditioning issues
Overview • A simple example • Brief review of ex post conditioning issues • Implications for tests of Efficient Markets Hypothesis
Performance measurement Style: Index Arbitrage, 100% in cash at close of trading
Is doubling low risk? $1 $0 $-1 1 p = 2
Is doubling low risk? $1 $0 $-3 1 p = 4
Is doubling low risk? $1 $0 $-7 1 p = 8
Is doubling low risk? $1 $0 $-15 1 p = 16
Is doubling low risk? $1 $0 $-31 1 p = 32
Is doubling low risk? $1 $0 $-63 1 p = 64
Is doubling low risk? $1 $0 $-127 1 p = 128
Is doubling low risk? • Only two possible outcomes • Will win game if play “long enough” • Bad outcome event extremely unlikely • Sharpe ratio infinite for managers who survive periodic audit
Apologia of Nick Leeson “I felt no elation at this success. I was determined to win back the losses. And as the spring wore on, I traded harder and harder, risking more and more. I was well down, but increasingly sure that my doubling up and doubling up would pay off ... I redoubled my exposure. The risk was that the market could crumble down, but on this occasion it carried on upwards ... As the market soared in July [1993] my position translated from a £6 million loss back into glorious profit. I was so happy that night I didn’t think I’d ever go through that kind of tension again. I’d pulled back a large position simply by holding my nerve ... but first thing on Monday morning I found that I had to use the 88888 account again ... it became an addiction” Nick LeesonRogue Trader pp.63-64
The case of the Repeated Doubler • Bernoulli game: • Leave game on a win • Must win if play long enough • Repeated doubler • Reestablish position on a win • Must lose if play long enough
The challenge of risk management • Performance and risk inferred from logarithm of fund value:
The challenge of risk management • Performance and risk inferred from logarithm of fund value: • is expected return of manager • Lower bound on with probability is Value at Risk (VaR)
The challenge of risk management • Performance and risk inferred from logarithm of fund value: • But what the manager observes is A = {set of price paths where doubler has not embezzled}
The challenge of risk management • Performance and risk inferred from logarithm of fund value: • But what the manager observes is yet A = {set of price paths where doubler has not embezzled}
Ex post conditioning • Ex post conditioning leads to problems • When inclusion in sample depends on price path • Examples • Equity premium puzzle • Variance ratio analysis • Performance measurement • Post earnings drift • Event studies • “Anomalies”
Effect of conditioning on observed value paths • The logarithm of value follows a simple absolute diffusion on
Effect of conditioning on observed value paths • The logarithm of value follows a simple absolute diffusion on • What can we say about values we observe? A = {set of price paths observed on }
Effect of conditioning on observed value paths • Define • Observed values follow an absolute diffusion on Stephen Brown, William Goetzmann and Stephen Ross “Survival” Journal of Finance 50 1995 853-873.
Example: Absorbing barrier at zero AsTgoes to infinity, conditional diffusion is Expected return is positive, increasing in volatility and decreasing in ex ante probability of failure
Important result • Ex post conditioning a problem whenever inclusion in the sample depends on value path • Effect exacerbated by volatility • Induces a spurious correlation between return and correlates of volatility
Important result • Ex post conditioning a problem whenever inclusion in the sample depends on value path • Effect exacerbated by volatility • Induces a spurious correlation between return and correlates of volatility • A much misunderstood issue in empirical Finance!
Important result • Ex post conditioning a problem whenever inclusion in the sample depends on value path • Effect exacerbated by volatility • Induces a spurious correlation between return and correlates of volatility • A much misunderstood issue in empirical Finance!
Equity premium puzzle • With nonzero drift, as T goes to infinity • If true equity premium is zero, an observed equity premium of 6% ( ) implies 2/3 ex ante probability that the market will survive in the very long term given the current level of prices ( )
Unconditional price path p0 pT
Conditional price paths pT * p0
Properties of survivors • High return • Low risk • Apparent mean reversion: • Variance ratio =
‘Hot Hands’ in mutual funds Cross section regression of sequential performance
Survivorship, returns and volatility • Index distributions by a spread parameter • Selection by performance selects by volatility Stephen Brown, William Goetzmann, Roger Ibbotson, Stephen Ross “Survivorship bias in performance studies” Review of Financial Studies, December 1992 553-580.
Managers differ in volatility Manager y Manager x a 0%
Performance persists among survivors • Conditional on x, y surviving both periods: Stephen Brown, William Goetzmann, Roger Ibbotson, Stephen Ross “Survivorship bias in performance studies” Review of Financial Studies, December 1992 553-580.
Prices of ten art works Korteweg, Arthur G. and Kräussl, Roman and Verwijmeren, Patrick, Does it Pay to Invest in Art? (October 15, 2013). Available at : http://ssrn.com/abstract=2280099