190 likes | 363 Views
Afghan Blog/News of the Day/. Afghan Blog—Melanie Wicander News of the Day--Kunal Hiranandani China…Part 1 of 3 from Jones’ documentary http://blip.tv/file/1010165. Singapore. Why a Tiny Island Nation Matters in Global Press Freedom. Singapore. 4.5 million people
E N D
Afghan Blog/News of the Day/ Afghan Blog—Melanie Wicander News of the Day--Kunal Hiranandani China…Part 1 of 3 from Jones’ documentary http://blip.tv/file/1010165
Singapore Why a Tiny Island Nation Matters in Global Press Freedom
Singapore 4.5 million people Prosperous and calm amidst the chaos of Asia Small financial island nation that runs efficiently—making it a good place to do business—even the media business Controlled for 30 years by Lee Kwan Yew—and now by his sons and daughters Nominal opposition political party that has never won a majority of votes. Singaporeans tend to agree that a government that eradicated poverty, corruption, and crime is worth voting for…and not criticizing
But the same view of the press as China… A free press is a threat to government control Pragmatic approach to the press—use it to control people, control it to control people. Press is to used as a tool of the government…not as a tool of the people Control of ideas versus the marketplace of ideas Government knows best—much like the idea of “market socialism.” The market only works if there is government oversight. Thus the media only works well if there is government oversight.
In Singapore, there’s no gloss of a “free press.” Singaporean press is state controlled…Singapore Press Holdings…although it appears as a global multinational corporation just like any other global media company. Media is considered a way to disseminate information to the people…entertain…and make money International media is controlled through fees, licensing and the law…laws that favor the government
Singapore’s Tactics for Press Control In response to Reporters without Borders’ report in 2005, Lee said: “You are not going to teach us how we should run the country…We are not so stupid, we know what our interests are and how to preserve them.”
A Brief history… Singapore’s history--has no historical precedent for a free press—unlike Hong Kong, another British colony, that had a thriving free press before the handover in 1997 Need for control early on because of its location A Chinese majority surrounded by Malaysia and Indonesia Multi-cultural state designed to keep order between Chinese, Indians, Malays—seeking racial harmony and a national identity Priority is placed on communitarian ideals over individual ideals Press is controlled by the government—to help promote harmony and the national identity
How it works…for Singaporeans Lee Kwan Yew is the spokesman for the debate against free speech—his opinion carries immense weight with the Singaporean people. Dissent is legal, but discouraged. Freedom of expression and speech is written into the Constitution but it is not an absolute freedom. Gov’t can pass laws in interest of national security, morality, restrictions to protect the privileges of Parliament All videos/dvds entering Singapore are viewed by a censorship committee. Films are edited for content. Singaporean film makers can be fined up to 500,000 euros (about $750,000) for making films considered “partisan.” But some film makers get around it— “12 Stories”
And works…for the foreign press News media can be gazetted—circulation is cut to 500 copies with the government having the right to distribute the copies as it sees fit. Allows government to say it is allowing free speech, but with regulation Publications gazetted include Far Eastern Economic Review (1988 and banned completely in 2006), Time (1986), Asian Wall Street Journal (1987) Libel laws that include large monetary damage awards Requires media to appoint a publisher’s representative and post bonds of $124,000 to pay for legal fees for publications including Far Eastern Economic Review, the Financial Times, the International Herald Tribune, Time and Newsweek
While some have decided to leave…others play by the rules The Wall Street Journal sets up a global news operation in Singapore…and stops writing in general about Singapore business and politics. Bloomberg and the Economist settled libel suits out of court and paid damages and apologized. Accept the government notion that it is a “privilege, not a right” to publish in Singapore
So why does Singapore matter? Its view of the press (and capitalism) offers a counter-argument to the West’s “free press” ideals It stands as an economic and political model to be followed by other Asian nations—including China Singapore’s control relies on the legal system, heavy fines, financial hardship for journalists and citizens who speak up, and a citizenry that is happy with its economic situation so it demands less political and social freedom It has been successful in demanding changes from the foreign press
There are some cracks appearing Bloggers like “Mr. Brown” have a following The chasm between rich and poor in Singapore is growing—causing unrest and dissent Globalization may force change—cellphones and the Internet aren’t as easy to control Lee Kwan Yew’s death is likely to lead to an easing of restrictions
First Half Wrap Up Government Control versus Corporate Control? I
Corporate Control U.S. media operates under the umbrella of a free press But is it the press that our founders meant when they crafted the First Amendment? As A.J. Liebling once said “the press is free for the people who can own one.” What are the dangers of a free press in a free market?
Are the excesses of gov’t control easier to see than the excess of corporate owners?
What happens when gov’t control begins to mimic corporatization? • Singapore example • Control of the press and information hidden by a plethora of newspapers, magazines, etc. that offer celebrity gossip, sports, fashion, crime (as long as it doesn’t deal with political figures. • Media is about making a profit—not about investigation, questioning—”giving voice to the voiceless.” • Regulations and punishments are financial instead of physical. Fines instead of prison; huge court costs instead of torture; threat of loss of job instead of the loss of life.
Midterm Minimum requirements. These are only guidelines. Paper—5-7 pages Why this journalist? Give a history as well as your personal reasons for choosing this journalist. How does this journalist symbolize what is happening in their country regarding press freedom—or lack thereof? Cite at least two specific examples of the journalist’s work and explain why you chose these examples. What do they reveal about the journalist’s role in their country’s press system? Sign up sheet