1 / 14

San Diego Unified School District

San Diego Unified School District. 2012-2013 X Factor Analysis. Committee Members. Debbie Foster – Co-Chair (F) David Lorden – Co-Chair (A) Area Sup Cesar Alcantar, Atypical Principal Kirk Ankeney*, Small School Principal Barbara Samilson, High School Principal

dyllis
Download Presentation

San Diego Unified School District

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. San Diego Unified School District 2012-2013 X Factor Analysis

  2. Committee Members • Debbie Foster – Co-Chair (F) • David Lorden – Co-Chair (A) Area Sup • Cesar Alcantar, Atypical Principal • Kirk Ankeney*, Small School Principal • Barbara Samilson, High School Principal • Hedieh Khajavi, Human Resources • Jonathan McDade, Elementary Principal • Lillie McMillan, Elementary School Principal • Sarah Sullivan, Middle School Principal • Gamy Rayburn, Finance * Added at end of process for added small school perspective. Cesar was formerly a small school principal.

  3. What Worked with 2011-2012 Model! • Provided control and some flexibility • The process of involving school communities with decision-making • Ability to strategize around what schools have and what they need • Provided an attempt at maximum flexibility • In concept, addressing the needs of different types of schools

  4. What Didn’t Work • Consideration of unique needs of all types of schools • Funding ratio favored some and hurt others. Depending on cut point, a school with higher enrollment received considerably less per student • Timeliness of decisions • Internal consequences of bumping • Confusion in nursing, counseling, etc.. • Lack of funding considerations for unique populations (high Sp.Ed for example) • Changes in BOE actions along the way • Lack of consistent implementation of rules, policies, etc.. • Unrealistic timelines

  5. 2011-2012 X Factor Funding Ratio Starting Per Student = $396 Ratio Amt Per Student • Small Elementary School (<300) 1.5 $594 • Mid Size Elem. Level 1 (300-399) 1.2 $475 • Mid Size Elem. Level 2 (400-750) 1.0 $396 • Large elementary (>750) 1.25 $495 • Small Middle School (<750) 2.6 $1,030 • Large Middle School (>750) 2.0 $792 • K-8 2.3 $910 • Small High School 2.3 $910 • Mid Size High School (<2300) 1.85 $733 • Large High School (>2300) 1.7 $673 • Atypical/Alternative 2.6 $1,030

  6. The X Factor Committee’s Charge • Learn and apply what worked and what didn’t work with X Factor funding from 2011-2012 • Distribute the allocated X Factor dollars in a way which would more closely align with enrollment by devising formulas for schools to normalize funding to growth. • Consider the minimum needed to keep  offices and schools operating while staying within a $69 million cap. Given restoration of furlough days and the 3% raise, this equated to approximately a $10 million reduction to X Factor • Investigate what each school bought with their X Factor fund as a guide and then redistributed the X Factor as appropriate • Investigate our authority to weigh for special needs (poverty, special ed, magnet, atypical, school academic focus, etc…)

  7. Elementary Schools $280 Per Student Plus an ESA @ $61,325

  8. K-8 Schools For Every Increase of 50 Students starting at $850 for 350 students, Per Pupil Allocation Decreases by $10, Plus an ESA @ $61,325

  9. Middle Schools For Every Increase of 25 Students Starting at $1,042 for 400 students, Per Pupil Allocation Decreases by $10

  10. High Schools For Every Increase of 50 Students, Starting at $803 for 1,150 Students, the Per Pupil Allocation Decreases by $5

  11. Small High Schools For Every Increase of 35 Students, Starting at $1,000 for 375 Students, the Per Pupil Allocation Decreases by $35

  12. Atypical Schools $975 Per Student Plus 2.0 Counselors at Twain & Garfield

  13. Year Over Year X-Factor ComparisonActual 11/12 v. 12/13 Proposed (by total amount allocated school sites)

More Related