1 / 20

NATO PSOs (ISAF) and Defence Economics Issues

NATO PSOs (ISAF) and Defence Economics Issues. Dr. Szenes Zoltán CSc ZM NDU Department of Security and Defence Policy. Conference on Peace Support Operations and Defence Economics. 29 May 2008. NATO: Level of Commitment. Afghanistan. Iraq. OAE. Humanitarian Relief. Kosovo. PP s. Bosnia.

dysis
Download Presentation

NATO PSOs (ISAF) and Defence Economics Issues

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NATO PSOs (ISAF) and Defence Economics Issues Dr. Szenes Zoltán CScZM NDU Department of Security and Defence Policy Conference on Peace Support Operations and Defence Economics. 29 May 2008

  2. NATO: Level of Commitment Afghanistan Iraq OAE Humanitarian Relief Kosovo PPs Bosnia OAE Africa Kosovo Baltic & Slovenian Air policing Balkan NHQ Defence Reform NRF Concept NRF FOC Bosnia 1996 2002 2007

  3. Force Providers to the ongoing PSOs

  4. INTEGRATED MILITARY STRUCTURE NATO RESOURCE PILLARS AGENCY BUDGETS DEPLOYABLE STRATEGIC EQUIPMENT CIVIL BUDGET CIVILIAN MANPOWER MILITARY BUDGET MILITARY MANPOWER FIXEDINFRASTRUCTURE BUDGETS NSIP MANPOWER NATO’s three resource pillars

  5. National and NATO resources • Nations spend: • 2.7% of GDP on defence • Of this nations spend: • 0.44% on NATO (MB 0.17%) • What does this buy? • The “glue” of the alliance. • Integrated command structure • Combined exercises • NATO Response Force (NRF) • NAEW • Missions and Operations

  6. NATO Resources 2007 1rough estimate (base on cca 13K military posts in the PE)

  7. PSOMilitary Budget tendency

  8. ISAF NSIP and Military Budget (2007) NSIP 647.5 M€ MILITARY BUDGET 266.4 M€ NTM-I 3% BALKANS 18 % NHQ Sa 2% NTM-I 6% JFC 3% KFOR 10% ISAF 78% 206.3 M€ ISAF 79% 514 M€

  9. Funding Mechanisms • Common funded---NAMSA • Funded by NATO nations through established cost-shares (Funding eligibility- Funding principle) • Multi-nationally funded (Joint) --- MN Logistics • Funded by agreement (CAOCs, NRDC HQs) • Trust funding • Nationally funded--- Contracting and Outsoursing • Funded by individual nations

  10. ISAF Mission • Mission: • Assist the Afghan government to maintain security; • Facilitate the development of Afghan government structures; • Extend Afghan government control; and • Assist reconstruction and humanitarian efforts. • Desired Military End-state: • That Afghan National Security Forces are able to provide security and sustain stability in Afghanistan without NATO support.

  11. Counter Narcotics United Kingdom Lead Judicial Reform Italy Lead Disarmament Of Illegally Armed Groups (DIAG) Japan Lead Train the Afghan National Army United States Lead Train Police Forces EU Lead Afghanistan Development Rebuilding Afghanistan Afghan Compact 2007 SECURITY SECTOR REFORM INTERNATIONAL COMMUNITY UNAMA-NGOs ISAF OEF

  12. Bucharest Summit • Top priority • Clear Vision guided by four principles • a firm and shared long-term commitment • Support for enhanced Afghan leadership and responsibility • a comprehensive approach by the IC, bringing together civilian and military efforts • Increased cooperation and engagement with Pakistan’s neighbours • Political-Military Plan

  13. US CENTCOM CINC Strategic Guidance • Set conditions for security and strenghten governance in Afghanistan Working with ISAF , conduct operations, that provide security, stability, and maturing governance to the people of Afghanistan. Through Combined Security Transition Command (CSTC-A) continue to develope and grow the Afghanistan Security Forces (Lt Gen M.E. Dempsey)

  14. Kandahar Airfield Demining Airfield Operating Surfaces Airfield Operational Facilities Roads Bulk Fuel Installation Combined Air Terminal Ops (CATO) Environmental Baseline Study Air Traffic Control Tower Waste Water Treatment Plant APOD NATO Support Element Hazardous Material Cargo Pad Theater Map Depot Taxiway D2 reconstruction Role 3 Medical Treatment Facility Real Estate Expansion Domestic accommodations Operational accommodation Water and Sewer system Mazar-e-Sharif Aircraft Operating Surfaces, Patrol Road, Main and Sliding Gates, Morale & Welfare Compound, Runway, Maintenance facility Bagram Rotary and fixed wing AircraftOperating Surfaces KAIA North & Relocation Mine and UXO Clearance, AircraftOperating Surfaces, APOD Operational & Domestic Facilities,Environmental Baseline Study,MEDEVAC Rotary Wing Parking Apron, Perimeter road, Force protection Current ISAF Infra Projects

  15. Operational Logistics Support Projects

  16. KAF RLS & APOD Projects KAF NAMSA “junction” ties NATO and Nations to the highway to KAF

  17. Security Issues • Talibans’ Long term goal: take over the power • Priority: South, East and West • Concept: 1. Code of Conduct (attack the people of the goverment) 2. Operation Lesson (ISAF, foreigners) 3. Complex Operations (collateral demage)

  18. Insurgents Use Of IEDs • 50 % IED incidents, ISAF casualties- 53 % • IEDs are simply the insurgents’ method of achieving their short term military and longer term political aims. • Had they access to “conventional” weapons they would use them. • When ISAF efforts negate the effects of one type of IED they will seek alternatives. • IEDs can be used for “spectaculars” as well as tactical attacks.

  19. Results and Challenges • Contribution to Security and Stability (PRTs) • Security becomes more and more important • New Force Contributions • Real Fight with Insurgents • Long term mission- huge invesment

  20. Thank you for your attention! Questions?

More Related