80 likes | 145 Views
Differences between Games about War and the Real Thing. Call Of Duty: World At War.
E N D
Call Of Duty: World At War This game is based on World War 2 and how the US invaded small island under Japanese control. It shows the soldiers moving though the island and killing every thing in its path. In this scene the Japanese are shown torturing the US prisoners whipping them then finally killing them.
Japan The torturing part on the last slide did happen in real life the Japanese believe that it was better to die than surrender so some killed there prisoners. In every cod games you have infinity lives you will no die very unrealistic Russia Also on World at War it shows the Soviet Union taking back what they lost and then charging in to Berlin. The game World at War is vey realistic in how the weather and warfare was for example in Russia there is a lot of use of Tanks And Artillery Compare
Weapons On Call Of Duty World At War it is very accurate on weapons. 90% of the weapons were used in World War 2 For Example: The Thompson
The Trailer In the trailer it show the brutality of war the used of flame throwing tanks and the sneaky tactics of the Japanese the Japanese used to hind in the ground and tree to gain maximum advantage Conclusion: Call of Duty World at War is pretty realistic but it is the same as other games the is no emotion on the characters and when you died you respawn unlike real life.
By Joe Wardill Sorry clip was not on PowerPoint my vid on computer broke but the link is there to watch