1 / 15

Chapter 5

Chapter 5. Reduced Form Models: KPMG’s Loan Analysis System and Kamakura’s Risk Manager. Estimating PD: An Alternative Approach. Merton’s OPM took a structural approach to modeling default: default occurs when the market value of assets fall below debt value

eara
Download Presentation

Chapter 5

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Chapter 5 Reduced Form Models: KPMG’s Loan Analysis System and Kamakura’s Risk Manager

  2. Estimating PD: An Alternative Approach • Merton’s OPM took a structural approach to modeling default: default occurs when the market value of assets fall below debt value • Reduced form models: Decompose risky debt prices to estimate the stochastic default intensity function. No structural explanation of why default occurs.

  3. A Discrete Example:Deriving Risk-Neutral Probabilities of Default • B rated $100 face value, zero-coupon debt security with 1 year until maturity and fixed LGD=100%. Risk-free spot rate = 8% p.a. • Security P = 87.96 = [100(1-PD)]/1.08 Solving (5.1), PD=5% p.a. • Alternatively, 87.96 = 100/(1+y) where y is the risk-adjusted rate of return. Solving (5.2), y=13.69% p.a. • (1+r) = (1-PD)(1+y) or 1.08=(1-.05)(1.1369)

  4. Multiyear PD Using Forward Rates • Using the expectations hypothesis, the yield curves in Figure 5.1 can be decomposed: • (1+0y2)2 = (1+0y1)(1+1y1) or 1.162=1.1369(1+1y1) 1y1=18.36% p.a. • (1+0r2)2 = (1+0r1)(1+1r1) or 1.102=1.08(1+1r1) 1r1=12.04% p.a. • One year forward PD=5.34% p.a. from: (1+r) = (1- PD)(1+y) 1.1204=1.1836(1 – PD) • Cumulative PD = 1 – [(1 - PD1)(1 – PD2)] = 1 – [(1-.05)(1-.0534)] = 10.07%

  5. The Loss Intensity Process • Expected Losses (EL) = PD x LGD • If LGD is not fixed at 100% then: (1 + r) = [1 - (PDxLGD)](1 + y) Identification problem: cannot disentangle PD from LGD.

  6. Disentangling PD from LGD • Intensity-based models specify stochastic functional form for PD. • Jarrow & Turnbull (1995): Fixed LGD, exponentially distributed default process. • Das & Tufano (1995): LGD proportional to bond values. • Jarrow, Lando & Turnbull (1997): LGD proportional to debt obligations. • Duffie & Singleton (1999): LGD and PD functions of economic conditions • Unal, Madan & Guntay (2001): LGD a function of debt seniority. • Jarrow (2001): LGD determined using equity prices.

  7. KPMG’s Loan Analysis System • Uses risk-neutral pricing grid to mark-to-market • Backward recursive iterative solution – Figure 5.2. • Example: Consider a $100 2 year zero coupon loan with LGD=100% and yield curves from Figure 5.1. • Year 1 Node (Figure 5.3): • Valuation at B rating = $84.79 =.94(100/1.1204) + .01(100/1.1204) + .05(0) • Valuation at A rating = $88.95 = .94(100/1.1204) +.0566(100/1.1204) + .0034(0) • Year 0 Node = $74.62 = .94(84.79/1.08) + .01(88.95/1.08) • Calculating a credit spread: 74.62 = 100/[(1.08+CS)(1.1204+CS)] to get CS=5.8% p.a.

  8. Kamakura’s Risk Manager • Based on Jarrow (2001). • Decomposes risky debt and equity prices to estimate PD and LGD processes. • Fundamental explanatory variables: ROA, leverage, relative size, excess return over market index return, monthly equity volatility. • Type 1 error rate of 18.68%.

  9. Noisy Risky Debt Prices • US corporate bond market is much larger than equity market, but less transparent • Interdealer market not competitive – large spreads and infrequent trading: Saunders, Srinivasan & Walter (2002) • Noisy prices: Hancock & Kwast (2001) • More noise in senior than subordinated issues: Bohn (1999) • In addition to credit spreads, bond yields include: • Liquidity premium • Embedded options • Tax considerations and administrative costs of holding risky debt

  10. Appendix 5.1Understanding a Basic Intensity ProcessDuffie & Singleton (1998) • 1 – PD(t) = e-ht where h is the default intensity. Expected time to default is 1/h. • A rated firm: h=.001: expected to default once every 1,000 years. • B rated firm: h=.05: expected to default once every 20 years. • If have a portfolio with 1,000 A rated loans and 100 B rated loans, then there are 6 expected defaults per year = (1000*.001)+(100*.05)=6

  11. Systemic Default Intensities • hit = pitJt + Hit where Jt=intensity of arrival systemic events, Hit=firm-specific intensity of default arrival. • Cyclical increases default intensities. For example, if A (B) rated default intensity increases to .0012 (.055) then portfolio expects 6.7 defaults per year. • Figure 5.4 compares default intensity term structure for high credit risk (h=400 bp) vs. low credit risk (h=5 bp). The model can generate realistic default term structures.

More Related