1 / 21

Outline

Outline. Revised Proposal – Budget Preparation. Major Constraints and Assumptions. Total revised budget, grouped by:. Year and source of funds Institution and source of funds Budget Element WBS. Revised Budget Preparation. Almost no change to original Labor & Travel budget

eaubry
Download Presentation

Outline

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outline Revised Proposal – Budget Preparation • Major Constraints and Assumptions Total revised budget, grouped by: • Year and source of funds • Institution and source of funds • Budget Element • WBS

  2. Revised Budget Preparation • Almost no change to original Labor & Travel budget • Drill Development (Labor & Materials) stays the same as originally proposed * 1 Super Cluster contains 3 In-Ice Stations ** 1 In-Ice Station contains 3 in-ice antennae systems and 1 calibration device

  3. Revised Budget Preparation Equipment that originally was budgeted under U.S. Institutions (NSF), was transferred to Non U.S. institutions (Cost Sharing), in order to reduce the total request from NSF and keep the cost sharing at a level >30%. In order to meet the new budget constraints, purchasing process of equipment and materials gets complicated: 1. Institution A design an item (Labor) 2. Institution B purchase hardware based on this design, and ship it to Institution A (Capital Equipment / M&S) 3. Institution A will assemble and test it (Labor) In addition, part of the equipment will be purchased by the two Institutions that submitted the proposal (UW, UMD), and will be shipped to their subawards.

  4. Revised Proposal Budgetby Year and source of funds

  5. Revised Proposal Budget by Institution and source of funds

  6. Revised Proposal Budget by Budget Elements

  7. ARA - Work Breakdown Structure

  8. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS

  9. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS

  10. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.1 Project Support,Lead: A. Karle UW-Madison WBS 1.1 Labor

  11. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.2 Drilling, Installation & Infrastructure,Lead: J. Haugen UW-Madison WBS 1.2 Labor

  12. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.2 Drilling, Installation & Infrastructure,Lead: J. Haugen UW-Madison

  13. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.2 Drilling, Installation & Infrastructure,Lead: J. Haugen UW-Madison

  14. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.3 Instrumentation, Lead: P. Gorham UH-Manoa WBS 1.3 Labor

  15. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.3 Instrumentation, Lead: P. Gorham UH-Manoa

  16. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.3 Instrumentation, Lead: P. Gorham UH-Manoa

  17. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.4 Online,Lead:K. Hanson, Université Libre de Bruxelles WBS 1.4 Labor

  18. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.4 Online,Lead:K. Hanson, Université Libre de Bruxelles

  19. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.5 Simulation, Calibration & Commissioning, Lead: K. Hoffman UMD WBS 1.5 Labor

  20. Revised Proposal Budgetby WBS WBS 1.5 Simulation, Calibration & Commissioning, Lead: K. Hoffman UMD

More Related