1 / 30

Charing Chong Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital / North District Hospital

Surgery for Severe Pancreatitis: Whom, When and What. Charing Chong Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital / North District Hospital. Definition. W h a t i s s e v e r e p a n c r e a t i t i s ?.

eddy
Download Presentation

Charing Chong Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital / North District Hospital

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Surgery for Severe Pancreatitis: Whom, When and What Charing Chong Alice Ho Miu Ling Nethersole Hospital / North District Hospital

  2. Definition W h a t i s s e v e r e p a n c r e a t i t i s ? “ Acute pancreatitis with the presence of organ failure (e.g., shock, pulmonary insufficiency, renal failure, or gastrointestinal bleeding) or pancreatic or peri-pancreatic complications (e.g., necrosis, abscess, or pseudocyst), or both, along with unfavorable early prognostic signs (e.g., using the Ranson criteria or the APACHE II score) “ Bradley EL 3rd: A clinically based classification system for acute pancreatitis. Summary of the International Symposium on Acute Pancreatitis, Atlanta, 1992. Arch Surg 1993

  3. PATIENT SURGEON

  4. Who requires surgery? When to intervene? What technique should be used?

  5. WHOM?

  6. Whom S h o u l d a l l p a t i e n t s w i t h s e v e r e p a n c r e a t i t i s b e o p e r a t e d ? DETECTION OF NECROSIS ITSELF IS NOT AN INDICATION FOR SURGERY

  7. Whom S h o u l d a l l p a t i e n t s w i t h s e v e r e p a n c r e a t i t i s b e o p e r a t e d ? Over 90% of patients with sterile necrosis can be successfully treated without surgical intervention Surgical treatment of sterile necrosis appears to have a higher mortality rates (11.9%, C.I. 5.3 – 22.2) than the conservative treatment (2.3%, C.I. 0.3 – 8.2) in patient with sterile necrosis Ashley SW, et al. Necrotising pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2001 Buchler MW, et al. Acute necrotising pancreatitis: treatment stratergy according to status of infection. Ann Surg 2000 Heinrich S, et al. Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: A look at established paradigms. Ann Surg 2006

  8. Whom S h o u l d a l l p a t i e n t s w i t h s e v e r e p a n c r e a t i t i s b e o p e r a t e d ? STERILE NECROSIS Small subset warrants surgery: • Deteriorating organ failure despite maximal support • Persisting symptoms that preclude hospital discharge despite several weeks of optimum conservative treatment Beger HG, et al. Acute pancreatitis: Who needs an operation? J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2002 Fernadez-del Castillo C, et al. Debridement and closed packing for the treatment of necrotising pancreatitis. Ann Surg 2000

  9. Whom S h o u l d a l l p a t i e n t s w i t h s e v e r e p a n c r e a t i t i s b e o p e r a t e d ? NECROTIZING PANCREATITIS WITH PROVEN INFECTED NECROSIS IS AN INDICATION FOR SURGICAL INTERVENTION Werner J, et al. Management of acute pancreatiits: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 2005. Uhl W, et al. IAP guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2002. Ranson JHC. The current management of acute pancreatitis. Adv Surg 1995. McFadden DW, Reber HA. Indications for surgery in severe acute pancreatitis. Int J Pancreatol 1994.

  10. Complete blood picture Positive blood culture Positive endotoxin test of blood Gas in and around the pancreas on CT scan Merely indirect evidence of infection in general CT- or USG - guided fine-needle aspiration High accuracy, 89.4% - 100% Safe and reliable Whom W h a t i s t h e b e s t d i a g n o s t i c t o o l ? Banks PA, et al. CT-guided aspiration of suspected pancreatic infection: bacteriology and clinical outcome. Int J Pancreatol 1995. Rau B, et al. Role of ultrasonographically guided fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of infected pancreatic necrosis. Br J Surg 1998.

  11. WHEN?

  12. EARLY To control sepsis and prevent major organ failure High mortality rate LATE Border between normal and necrotic pancreatic tissue becomes more distinct with time Minimize intra-operative haemorrhage Avoid unnecessary removal of normal pancreas When W h a t i s t h e o p t i m a l t i m i n g f o r s u r g i c a l i n t e r v e n t i o n ?

  13. When W h a t i s t h e o p t i m a l t i m i n g f o r s u r g i c a l i n t e r v e n t i o n ? Early versus late necrosectomy in severe necrotizing pancreatitis.  J. Mier, E. León, A. Castillo, F. Robledo, R. Blanco The American Journal of Surgery 1997, Volume 173, Pages 71-75. • Early (within 72 hours, n = 25) vs Late (more than 12 days, n = 15) • Indication: MOF with clinical deterioration despite maximal intensive care • Open packing and staged necrosectomy • Mortality: 56% (Early) vs 27% (Late) • Terminated early because of very high mortality rate for patients underwent early surgery (Odds ratio 3.4)

  14. When W h a t i s t h e o p t i m a l t i m i n g f o r s u r g i c a l i n t e r v e n t i o n ? In case of suspected or proven infection of necrosis, prophylactic antibiotic treatment could be primarily applied EARLY SURGERY IS NOT RECOMMENDED FOR SEVERE ACUTE PANCREATITIS Heinrich S, et al. Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: A look at established paradigms. Ann Surg 2006 Isaji S, et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: surgical management.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg.2002.

  15. When W h a t i s t h e o p t i m a l t i m i n g f o r s u r g i c a l i n t e r v e n t i o n ? However, reports have different views about the length of time that conservative management should be applied before surgical intervention is considered. (Period ranging from 3 – 5 days to more than 5 weeks) ALTHOUGH IT IS DIFFICULT TO RECOMMEND AN EXACT DURATION, AT LEAST 3-4 WEEKS OF CONSERVATIVE MANAGEMENT IS DESIRABLE Werner J, et al. Management of acute pancreatiits: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 2005. Buchler P, et al. Surgical approach in patients with acute pancreatitis. Is infected or sterile necrosis an indication — in whom should this be done, when, and why? Gastroenterol Clin North Am 1999.

  16. WHAT?

  17. PANCREATIC RESECTION: Increased perioperative morbidity Normal pancreatic parenchyma unnecessarily removed Long term outcome of patients is closely related to the amount of preserved pancreatic tissue What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? Uhl W, et al. International Association of Pancreatology. IAP Guidelines for the surgical management of acute pancreatitis. Pancreatology 2002. ORGAN PRESERVING NECROSECTOMY IS THE SURGICAL TECHNIQUE OF CHOICE FOR TREATMENT OF INFECTED PANCREATIC AND PERIPANCREATIC NECROSIS

  18. What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? OPEN PACKING +/- PLANNED STAGED RE-LAPAROTOMIES • Performed in 48-hour intervals • Until all necrosis has resolved and granulation tissue developed • Lower recurrent intra-abdominal sepsis • Higher post-operative morbidity like fistulae, bleeding and incisional hernias Bradley EL 3rd, Allen K.. A prospective longitudinal study of observation versus surgical intervention in the management of necrotizing pancreatitis. Am J Surg. 1991 Werner J,et al. Surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2003.

  19. What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? CLOSED PACKING +/- CONTINUOUS POST-OPERATIVE LAVAGE • Necrosectomy and subsequent closed continuous lavage of lesser sac • 8 – 10 L/day through surgically placed drainages • To continuously remove residual pancreatic necrosis • Re-laparotomies are frequently not necessary • Less post-operative morbidity Beger HG. Operative management of necrotizing pancreatitis: necrosectomy and continuous closed postoperative lavage of the lesser sac. Hepatogastroenterology. 1991. Werner J,et al. Surgical treatment of acute pancreatitis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 2003.

  20. What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ?

  21. What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ?

  22. What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? CAREFUL SINGLE NECROSECTOMY AND POST-OPERATIVE LAVAGE WITHOUT PLANNED RELAPAROTOMIES SEEMS TO BE LESS HARMFUL AND COULD BE CONSIDERED WHEN APPLICABLE Heinrich S, et al. Evidence-based treatment of acute pancreatitis: A look at established paradigms. Ann Surg 2006. Isaji S, et al. JPN Guidelines for the management of acute pancreatitis: surgical management. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg. 2006. Werner J, et al. Management of acute pancreatiits: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 2005.

  23. What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? Only a few prospective trials None of them was randomized Level of evidence is very low

  24. MINIMALLY INVASIVE RETROPERITONEAL PANCREATIC NECROSECTOMY  Removal of the solid necrotic material under direct vision through a wide bore tract  Use of high volume post-operative lavage  Can be performed under local anaesthesia  Reduced the need for post-operative intensive care  Avoiding escalation of organ dysfunction  Increase in the number of procedures What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? Connor S et al. Minimally invasive retroperitoneal pancreatic necrosectomy. Dig Surg 2003. Carter RC, et al. Percutaneous necrosectomy and sinus tract endoscopy in the management of infected pancreatic necrosis: An initial experience. Ann Surg 2000. Not yet been shown to significantly reduce mortality

  25. ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY: First reported by Baron in 1996 Several transgastric o transduodenal drainage catheters inserted endoscopically Lavage continued until resolution of the collection 2-4 procedures were required for resolution Mean duration of catheter placement was 19 days Successful removal of necrosis in > 80% No mortality Almost 40% iatrogenic infection Serious complication in 45% of patient including serious bleeding, perforation Up to 60% developed further collection after two years What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? Baron T, et al. Endoscopic therapy for organized pancreatic necrosis. Gastroenterology 1996.

  26. What A n y p l a c e f o r e n d o s c o p i c t h e r a p y ?

  27. What W h i c h s u r g i c a l t e c h n i q u e s h o u l d b e u s e d ? MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURES FOR INFECTED PANCREATIC NECROSIS ARE STILL EVOLVING Werner J, et al. Management of acute pancreatiits: from surgery to interventional intensive care. Gut 2005.

  28. Conclusion W h a t s h a l l w e d o ? • Whom • Infected necrosis • Sterile necrosis with MOF despite maximal support • When • Early surgery not recommended • Desirable to be 3rd to 4th week after the onset • What • Organ preserving necrosectomy vs pancreatic reseciton • Open vs closed • Packing vs continuous lavage • Convention vs Minimally invasive

  29. Conclusion W h a t s h a l l w e d o ? • Low level of evidence • Further studies: • Refine the indications for surgery • Define the timing for surgery • Find the optimal procedures • Newer approaches: laparoscropic, endoscopic, retroperitoneal procedures

More Related